Mem like mem but, can't at least the bottom part of this inscription be considered credible?
I will effort to explain to readers the harmfulness of EU regulations on the example of the last "Directive", which has been subject to the EU since 24 December 2025. Before I go to the meritum, let me have a individual reflection on the parliamentary majority I consider to be idiots. As it is, there is no control over Parliament in this supposedly arch-democratic Union that acts like our Sejm with the difference that, fortunately, the president is the President. In the EP, the majority can pass a completely detached directive and urge their introduction without the consent of the associate States. The last directive is "sexual neutrality" concerning employers' employment of fresh workers. It is so crucial to say goodbye to masons, carpenters, nurseries and another names of professions utilized for years. In connection with the fresh directive, fresh names should be utilized in advertisements, e.g. a individual doing masonry work, a individual doing carpentry work, or a individual doing care work and another specified stupidities.
Let's look at 1 example of a individual doing masonry work - a man or a female or 1 of the 56 sex identities described in any classification systems. due to the fact that I'm old-fashioned, it stays with a female and a man. Whether there are circumstantial provisions on e.g. retirement age in the directive already in force, wellness and safety at work on limits to the transport of trucks. Only in these 2 issues are the differences significant, and erstwhile the individual doing the masonry work becomes pregnant what next? How will the employer find a solution to this problem, or have the idiots legislators thought about it?
The president "It's better to blur everything out, due to the fact that the naming to date can offend someone, exclude or- and worse, it will let you to guess who's doing what and why. Since it is no longer allowed to call things by their first name, there is no wonder that it is increasingly hard to separate between common sense and absurdity." https://www.facebook.com/reel/1383345896512001
If the European Union does not change the direction in which it is headed, it will fall in the form it presently operates.And this is not the opinion of alleged populists but scientists and politicians of the Iberal pedigree. Finnish Nobel Prize laureate in economics Bengt Holmstrom, Spanish economist and erstwhile Liberal Euro MP Luis Garciano and many others point to this possibility.
Paraphrased by the words of S. Kisielewski - the EU must solve the problems it has created and continues to create. And if she doesn't, then the opponents she raises by making and implementing idiotic ideas will do it for her.
https://www.liil.eu/promujnotke
