European Commission rejected 86 requests for access to public information made by the European Parliamentary Group Patriots for Europe. This means that, while it is certain that groups of far-left political activists were financed from the money of European taxpayers, there is no documentation of how and precisely what amounts they were awarded.
The EC refused to disclose the data it financed to left-wing organisations. The organisation of the MCC Brussels and the Group of the European Parliament of the Patriots for Europe announced that they would re-apply for complete data, that they would besides mention the substance to the European Ombudsman and, if necessary, mention the substance to court.
Hungarian MEP Csaba Dömötör noted that public information requests are common practice in all associate States, including Hungary. As he noted, the Hungarian ministries have an work to print information about what agreements they conclude, with whom and for what amount.
– Moreover, if individual requests them to make the data available, they must make available not only access to contracts but besides data related to their implementation within the time limits laid down by law. On the another hand, the European Commission, which constantly wants to tighten up the Hungarian Public Information Act, is not itself prepared to respond to requests for access to data He stressed, adding that the beneficiaries of EC support are not NGOs in the conventional sense, but a network of far-left political activists.
"For example, erstwhile Guy Verhofstadt, erstwhile Liberal leader, receives a grant of EUR 15 million for his organization, which he calls a NGO, it is not civilian society activity but a political network" – he wrote on the X portal.
– If organisations receive backing from Brussels and then sue Hungary, for example in connection with border protection, this is “political interference. A erstwhile Brussels finances organisations that produce papers for reports on the regulation of law, which then service as a basis for "holding up EU funds to which we are entitled is simply a clear political force which has nothing to do with conventional civilian society said the politician.
Csaba Dömötör recalled that the fresh U.S. administration had solved 80% of U.S.ID's contracts as it considered they service ideological purposes. In this context he mentioned scandal around erstwhile EU Commissioner Frans Timmermans, suspected of handing over large sums of money to alleged non-governmental organisations, who alternatively promoted the views of the Commission and even organised demonstrations against political opponents specified as the European Parliament. B. environmental activists against farmers.
According to politics, 90% of the income of specified organisations comes from external sources, from the European Commission, American circles or related to judaic speculator George Soros.
In turn, András László, Fidesz MEP, stated that "many NGOs are in fact an extension of governments" alternatively than independent civilian society actors, as late shown by corruption scandal in Qatar Or the Timmermans affair.
– You request to know where the money comes from, what it's spent on and who's truly behind these organizations. – said the politician, adding that after the suspension of the USAID, media and NGOs immediately raised the alarm that they were facing bankruptcy.
– Political interventions in 7 EU and NATO associate States in Central Europe were carried out through USAID projects, and these funds are hard to trace due to the fact that they flow across many levels — NGOs and coordinating organisations — before reaching the final beneficiary. This is simply a clear effort at political interference. Grants were granted without consultation with local authorities, which besides constitutes interference “András László said.
OUR COMMENTS: Unfortunately, after the dissolution of the USAID, the European Commission has taken over the financing of the activists of the far left, and so most of them will inactive gotta confuse Europeans and pretend to be an artificial crowd of supposedly widespread support for environmentalism, the federalization of the EU, globalisation, sodomy, genderism and mass immigration.
We besides recommend: The EU promotes Islam as a "new religion for Europeans"
