So-called. For 15 months, the Constitutional Tribunal blocked the “lawful”! Most of them are democratic, for 1 year and 3 months – due to the fact that the first vacancy was created in December 2024. – in an absolutely conscious and thoughtful way, she did not choose judges, so that the Court would not function, to destruct the Court, to torpedo his work.
I will besides mention to the judgement of the Constitutional Court of December 2015, erstwhile Mr Rzeplinski was the president. The members included: Mrs Jaskiewicz, Mr Kieres, Mr Rymar, Mr Wróbel and Mr Zubik, i.e. not judges who do not respect or exclude the coalition majority today. This composition made it very clear what the choice should look like: ‘Determining the deadline for the application of applications for a justice of the Court within 30 days of the date of entry into force of the Constitutional Tribunal Act allowed the majority of the quasi-en bloc parliament to decide at 1 point on the appointment of judges whose word of office expires at different times’. Thus, the Court says: it is impossible to block judges, and if they are already invoked, then a circumstantial word of office. The rulers should have done it sooner – they did not, although they had all the possibilities.
For example, in the case of Mr Krystian Markiewicz. This is due to the resolution of the Sejm – there is no mention of erstwhile the word of office begins, or where the judges enter. This judgement of the Court, with respect to Article 194 of the Constitution, is clear: the word of office of judges must be individualised. I will besides give another resolutions, for example from 2016: in the case of justice Jędrzejewski, it is pointed out explicitly that the word of office of the recently elected justice of the Constitutional Court starts on 28 April 2016. And so it was before. This is about the law, and the another side is about the violent force.
