The disciplinary punishment of Deputy Prosecutor General Michał Ostrowski indirectly confirms the legitimacy of the allegations raised by the president of the Constitutional Tribunal.
Na website National Prosecutor's Office a message came out:
Minister of Justice Adam Bodnar on 10 February 2025 pursuant to Article 153a(1) of the Act of 28 January 2016. Law on the prosecution appointed prosecutor Piotr Kowalik to service as Disciplinary Ombudsman of the Minister of Justice in order to conduct investigations on the apparent and gross image of the law by Prosecutor of the National Prosecutor's Office Michał Ostrowski, i.e. on disciplinary misconduct under Article 137(1) of the Law of the Prosecutor's Office.
Let us quote here a passage of the justification for the ultimate Court ruling of 4 September 2003 in the case SNO 51/03:
"An insult is apparent erstwhile a mistake is easy to tell, where a provision can be applied without a deeper analysis, where the knowing of a provision of law should not rise uncertainty on the average individual with legal qualifications. The word "dangerous" refers to the effects of an image of the law. For a justice to act as a disciplinary action, it is not adequate to make a manifest mistake for a decently educated lawyer. The mistake must besides jeopardise the rights and essential interests of the parties (other persons active in the proceedings) or origin damage. A threat to the good of justice or the courts may besides designate a characteristic of a violation of the law defined as a "dangerous insult". In order to recognise the image of the law as a disciplinary offence, it is essential to attribute both of the characteristics afraid together.. On the subject side, to delegate to the justice a disciplinary offence is adequate any kind of fault, including unintentional guilt."
However, according to the cited communication:
The offence of the law was to include the initiation and conduct of investigations without registration in the prosecution's registration system, with the intention to usage the powers provided for in Article 3(1)(1) of the Act The law on the prosecution in violation of the rule of objectivity and impartiality, and besides on the taking in the interests of a peculiar group of persons, exposed to work for violations of the democratic regulation of law, procedural acts excluding service pragmatism and rules of law commonly applicable, including the manner and scope of the law firm's operation in the National Public Prosecutor's Office.
A serious violation of the law occurred due to the fact that there was no registration in the prosecution's registration system???????
This translation can only go to the heads of the most fierce “strong in number” or even more limited lemmings!
In the light of the ruling of the ultimate Court, it is nothing but pseudo-legal gibberish.
It's comic to accuse procs.
"Bodnarists" though they would like to appear as nonsubjective lawyers cannot hide political motivation.
In the aforementioned communication, he stands like a bull in a flowering meadow that Proc. Ostrowski took action in the interests of a circumstantial group of persons liable for breach of democratic regulation of law.
What group is this, Mr. Oberprosecution Bodnar???
And what are the rules of the democratic regulation of law that were more violated during the governments of the Polish People's Republic than after 13 December 2023????
Apparently, the quoted message is calculated for a complete deficiency of cognition of the law among voters compromise 13 December. Otherwise, you cannot realize the next passage:
Prosecutor Michał Ostrowski accepted a letter from the president of the Constitutional Tribunal Bogdan Święczkowski, with whom he remains in close relations and with whom he was subordinate from 4 March 2016 to 16 February 2022, providing a notification of the offence referred to in Article 127 §1 kk, Articles 128 §1 and 3 kk and 258 §1 kk. This notification was not registered in the registration systems and was not transferred to the local and factually appropriate prosecutors for the intent of procedural examination.
Then, knowing that notification has a political dimension and there are no grounds for urgent action, and furthermore there are grounds for its exclusion pursuant to Article 47(1) of the Code in Article 41(1) of the Code of Conduct for the performance of the proceedings, has issued a decision to initiate an investigation into the conduct of Article 127(1) of the Code of Conduct in conjunction with Article 128(1) and (3) of the Code of Conduct in conjunction with Article 65(1) of the Code of Conduct in conjunction with Article 12(1) of the Code of Conduct and Article 258(1) of the Code of Conduct and subsequently carried out further procedural proceedings.
Bodnar deliberately misleads the public. Article 41 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides only for the anticipation of excluding a justice at the request of a organization (in accordance with Article 47(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure applies to the exclusion of a prosecutor). In this peculiar situation, the president of TK Bogdan Święczkowski is not a party.
The subject of the protection under Article 127 kk is the State, with Article 128 kk – state body. In turn, Article 258 kk protects public order and the safety of citizens.
As can be seen in any of the above-mentioned cases, the president of the Constitutional Tribunal cannot act as a victim is only a notifier. Neither did anyone submit an exemption application.
There is so no reason why he could be considered even hypothetically Article 41 kpk.
CBodnar's legal yrk... that's the only way to find the subsequent occurrences of the erstwhile "Rab" RPO.
But what he's doing right now is most likely 1 of the main nails to the coffin of government. coalition 13 December.
It is crucial to remember the words of the 19th-century Russian abroad Minister Alexander Gorczak:
I don't believe in unmentioned messages.
An inept effort to discredit Proc. Ostrowski is nothing but an effort to twist the biggest scandal after 1989.
Only this is the conclusion of today's communication.
And that's why it's increasingly common to believe that Bodnar and the remainder of the tusk hawk are... simple potatoes.
11.10 2025
_________________________________
* Oh, my God * - in the spring they'll dig, in the fall they'll plant
