I'll explain this to you for example, and then I'll generalize. Bryj is the back of the card game, but the mechanics in it are akin to those that we will find in the way, the environment or science. erstwhile individual introduces something new, it will consequence in more, more hard to associate – the text does not say: “Let us learn from them”. It says, "Save." And what starts from innocents in the head is simply a mirroring reflection of a deeper cylindrical disease: the fear of pre-innovation, which does not go with the pricetram, but with the periphery.
What's a bridge?
Britain is simply a card game for 4 people, in which it does not have happiness, but for a digest, a logo and a partner. The game consists of 2 phases: lycitation and gameplay. In the lycitation, the players deduce how much the lion is going to get and in the mediate of the ring, and then, in the playing field, they usage these déclaries to complete. Not the 1 who received the best cards, but the 1 who bested them.
For this purpose, the bridge is utilized as a ‘calendar’.
In this game, the communication between the parties takes place through the bidding process, which is based on a nutrient system. But only 1 crucial difference: all agreed by the partners must be clear and complex for the best.
Why would 3 explain their convention?
The bridge does not want to have any secret codes. If the 2 parties agreed that, for example, beginning up the 1st sign does not indicate the content and that, in all another words, they must make it clear to the public. The fair play will require that each associate prepares the alleged "convention card" – an opinion which gives an accurate impression of their composition.
The nonsubjective is to defend the transparency of the game and prevent hidden differences. It can be a combination, exotic, oryginal – but the driver must have respect for it. Theoretically, it's honest. In practice, it led to distortions.
What are ‘HUM systems’?
The inter-national bridge functions have introduced the "High different Methods" (HUM) cathetoria, which is highly non-teachable. They active sytems that were importantly different from the standards – e.g. the alleged strong belt, they were the situation erstwhile the game was playing, but the reality is very strong.
The another examples of HUM are beginning 1st, which do not gotta mark the clubs, or complex, artificial nutrients that the average player does not know and does not know. These products have not been submitted, but the game has been so popular with the impressions that in practice it has become impossible for most of the planet to play.
Polish Club – a Polish innovation that has terrorized the world
In the 70th and 80th years, Poland was a major force. Polish players have created a proprietary, re-launching Lycitated System, known as the “Polish Club”. In its full version, a "strong belt" was drilled – a supplement that could indicate strength alternatively than weakness. It was the desorientation of the crowds and it was the lead. It was based on a local, flexible and highly effective approach. And 1 of the things is that they didn't work out for players from the Anglo-Saxon lines, where they dominated simpler and more savvy Lithium methods.
The players – not the back of the game, but besides the Thereticals – were 5 of the innovations. But they fell down with Western resistance. In the U.S., the bridge was a strong communicative, easy and attractive place for the viewer. The Europa East was considered besides hard to complete and build by the public.
If you can’t aid them, change your seat
Among the inter-national oriental breech, specified as planet Bridge Federation (WBF) and European Bridge League (EBL), have introduced a series of studies involving any non-teaching systems, including "strong polish" systems, the Polish Club jakosystem HUM. This indicated that if the table was in place, it was in line with the back of the interview, but it was a peculiar agreement. For the majority of open-source tours, this marked a applicable ban.
Members had to play a “round” system. The Polish Club has been deprived. A strong band (or it was played back in a match where it had previously been agreed). The innovations were related to the “Green Sticker Systems” – allowed in open events. The effect? The Polish brig school lost the tool that made it unifying. She had to play in the hands of the superstatus quo.
It has been hard to make life hard for innovation. The leaders, wishing to play in the field, had to leave their own concepts and be in possession of the simplified standards imposed by the West.
Was it discrimination?
We do not know where the text is: “We will not be able to find it due to the fact that it is played by the Poles”. But just look at the context. Only a fewer nations were so well-known as Polish, possibly the USSR or Hungary. These players from the countries have implemented the innovations. And that's what these innovations have been about.
This was a de facto discrimination – an instinctive reaction to the fact that 1 was besides good, besides effective and besides hard to control by those who were utilized to playing ‘after’.
It was besides crucial with the accrual flow of these systems from the masonry turnarounds. It could have been utilized in the long run – but not in the long run.
Americals did not have Polish lycotic systems, and they did not have the possible to translate the population. Thus, the education of the population was considered difficult. It is simply a discrimination de facto, navet if not de jure.
What happened later?
The Polish Club has evolved. Today's variances of the strategy frequently do not conflict with a strong streak or are suitable for active outages. The review was "circular" so as to be able to re-assemble in the alleged Polish Club "green" or "brown sticker allowed" (whether with a limited alert). The Polish government has continued to usage the first version of the Polish Clubu.
What about it?
It is possible to advance the education of audiences and intercessors – not to be banned. It is possible to make a separate "Open Innovations" category, where you can play without any gameplay. It is besides possible to refocus – due to the fact that it is no longer a athletics of thought, as well as a athletics of compromises for light administrative strategies.
Americ bridge is an industry, not a sport
In the U.S., the brig has been de-commercialised (turns of Cavendish, hugely industrious), entrenched in climate and "gentleman's rules", dominated by simple, intuitive systems for masses – specified as Standard American (SAYC) or 2/1 Game Force. Publicity in the US (and their sponsors) was not included in the "complications from the east Europa". They wanted to: simple systems, predictive reflexes, flow-based patterns, not systolic. Hence, the force to usage hard-to-rebioactive materials was better.
WBF and EBL are organies that were acquired by the English, US and France. Inventions from these circles were very recent. The HUMs force on accrues. In theory, this is equal to all. In practice, those who play classical music are privileged due to the fact that they do not gotta learn anything. It's a strategy system.
The unusual strategy may be "unconstitutional" for concts or the public. But this should not be an argument of over-constituency — due to the fact that it is how the translation of the the explanation of the relativity on TikTok in 15 sec.
It is possible from this history
In terms of suffrage, no 1 will tell the gulf gambit, if you become more ‘wild’, no 1 will say that ‘you request to get 15 days earlier to play Benoi defence’, and 1 – in the brig, this is how it looks and any of it looks today.
Why is that absurd? The bridge should be a graph of the strategium and the intellect. If individual has invented a legal, a logical and does not break the ethical rule (e.g. they do not care about a secret code with a partner) then they should be able to play it. It would be as if individual had indicated in the plan of the usage of task models, “because they will not know”.
The bridge was to be a game of thought, balance and precision. But erstwhile 1 of the strategies turned out to be besides effective, the rules of the game changed to make it more difficult. Conclude honestly, the creations of regulates, which predicted simplicity and position quo.
This past is not a long communicative about 1 card game. This is an example of a large-scale musical instrument: erstwhile a novice is playing a good game, the council does not learn from it – it's being spent on it. To capture an intellectual advantage, predictiveness will be recorded.
If you have full ideas, you have quite a few feedback. possibly – it will price you. Like the prices of the Polish Club. As the Polish bridge school was priced.
The British Republic has been overrun by institutions. It would have stopped. It's a classy maneuver known from the large plots: “We can't aid you in your values, so let's change the rules to play on ours.” akin to the 1 in the media, it delecates the alternate therapies through lobbies – or in the environment: it reduces access to the marketplace through the licensee.
Media: translational innovations through the system
One of the most well-known examples of this is that they were either subliminal or promising in clinical practice.
Example 1: Metabolic and novelty teraries
In the 1970s in the United States, the consequence of the survey was that it was based on the amigdaline (Vietnamese B17). In spite of the many relationships with the re-missions of novites, the FDA (Leeks Agency) considered it to be not safe, despite the combination of 1 crucial volume command at standard donation. More importantly, it will not be able to sale the lec, but besides its promotion, and its suppliers have been subject to professional reviews. Far-reaching lobbies do not request to compete with this, natural means.
Example 2: Therapies with the usage of herbs or acupuncture
In large part of the media, the local authorities must function “under the control” or in a semi-colonial station, although the WHO officially recognises the part of these methods as effective in the selected indicators. Why? due to the fact that they cannot be defeated. The marketplace cannot be controlled on a tiny scale. It is so better to make a communicative with a "resource of command" than to let for competition with the pharmaceutical industry.
Environment: licenses, regulations, entrances
At the same time, the same mechanics operate through the creation of a plastic battery, which does not service the quality of services, but protects the performance from competition.
Example 1: Professional licenses
Do you want to become a frieze, a masażyczne or a financial advisor? In many areas you request years of training, experience, fees and membership in chambers. But these licensees do not always have a link to the quality of services — frequently a re-gular tool serving to reduce the number of competitors and to keep the power. The client cannot choose ‘his frieze without a license’, if he has a golden hand, due to the fact that he takes this in the name of ‘a protective consummation’.
Example 2: Uber vs. taxation corporations
Uber, erstwhile he came to the market, was not a large deal in large areas and towns. Not due to the fact that it was unsecure, but due to the fact that it broke the possible of taxation corporations. He did not want to let cheaper, more efficient service, so he utilized to depose it. It was shortly after the long waltz (and the social pressure) that it succeeded in becoming part of the countries.
Education and science: prices outside the framework
Also in the world, there is simply a powerful press release on the responsiveness of views consistent with the domineering narration.
Example 1: Theories from the mainstream
A physicist who wants to lower the practice underpinned by a general explanation of the comparative or the regulation of the advanced mechanics – if the veto has a central enumeration – can be discarded by reviewers “because it is unorthodox”. Alternate machines affect the environment or are simply ignorant.
Example 2: Anthropopology and "substantial themes"
Theories about the civilisations of prehistories (e.g. the explanation of the advanced civilizations of 10 1000 years ago, as advocated by Graham Hancocka) are tractotive as heresion. The main students and the main speakers are afraid of the dogmatic anticipation of developing a human being, although sometimes more cognition (Göbekli Tepe, underwater structures in Japan or India) may indicate that histories can be more than they teach us at school.
They always defend themselves – not the truth, not the beauty, not the progress
Whether it is in the bridge, the media, the environment or the discipline – the time erstwhile the novice is playing the game, it is not meant to be open-minded. The replacement of these will be made up of biurocratic and communicative braries. It is referred to as “safety”, “pure” and “heavy standards” – but in fact, it is intended to keep dominance, influence and money.
Thus, the ban on a strong patch is the back of 1 of the large examples of this phenomenon: the strategy of creativity, which escapes from the control of the decitive centres.
You want a change? You must not be behind the wisdom – you must besides be prepared to be infected.
The general correctness of the mechanics for the usage of mechanical engineering
In the fresh mechanics, it has shifted to digital space – especially to the American community media. This is not the case with alternate binding or novelist systems, but with a view and a word that is “not compatible with the intrinsically binding culture”.
Under the cover of "fights with the possible of non-nature", "protection of the minority" or "cares for the welfare of psycho-utilities", tikTok and Instagram began to remove content, konta and full channels – not for lying, but for failing.
Example 1: price of doctors in early pandemic
Early on, the COVID-19 pandemics of large doctors and scholars had a difference from the WHO or the CDC – they considered the lockdown principle, the mandatory strain or mask in open space. Their accounts were bloated, the felts removed, and the names of the main music. Not for the denunciation, but for the opposition to the consensual relationship.
Example 2: redefinition of words and sentences for ‘language’
The words, which are inactive deposed to be neutrural or abstract (e.g. “Murzyn” in Poland or “bigal alien” in the US), can now lead to the bloc of the account or permanent bubble. It is not adequate to incite to hatred – it is adequate to “slight the feelings” of a lump. This is not just an equal waltz. It is the language of the language of the narration control tool.
Example 3: shadowban and soft price
Many users are not able to veto their potential. Platforms simply halt promoting them, hide their writings from watching them or indicate their content as "controversial" – if they are full compatible with the facts. It's a soft fort of prices that I don't see, but that's the effect that has passed from the mainstream.
All of this is embedded in the same mechanom, which we observe in the bridge, mediocreness and environmentalism: erstwhile the thoughts that are burning dogma appear, it does not come in the dialogue. It cuts it out. For “the good of the general”, “safety”, “the community”, “the protection of feelings” — they were for all, but not for truth, freedom or development.
Grzegorz GPS Swiderski
]]>https://t.me/CanalBlogeraGPS]]>
]]>https://Twitter.com/gps65]]>
