The deficiency of signature of even 1 justice on the first of the judgement causes them to be considered non-existent as a judicial judgment

3obieg.pl 2 years ago

He must be convicted – to origin harm to property in large size and illegal imprisonment

Between Date 6 April 2007 (Friday) a date 6 April 2023 (Thursday) is 5844 days which is 16 years old.

Who is subject to criminal work according to the Criminal Code?

Article 189. – [Unlawful imprisonment] - Penal Code.

Depriving of liberty – a crime involving an unlawful effort on the liberty of the victim in leaving the place where he is presently located. Where the imprisonment referred to in paragraphs 1 to 2a has been linked to peculiar torment, the offender is subject to imprisonment for a period not little than 3 years.

Economic injury

Significant harm to property is harm to the value of the crime exceeds PLN 200,000. Crime under these conditions is sentenced to imprisonment from 3 months to 5 years and is the kind of primary crime of abuse of trust. In case of harm to property in large sizes, the conviction of imprisonment shall be between 1 and 10 years (Article296 §3 kk).

Subject:

PR 3 Ds. 359/17 – II K 1423/18 – V KO 85/18 – II K 38/19(20)

PR 3 Ds. 183/18 – II K 1456/18 – V KO 86/18 – II K 851/18

PR 1 Ds. 535/19 – II K 900/19 – V KO 68/21

I was left illegally, illegally, in gangsteric, politically, in violation of the Polish Charter of the Rights of the Victim, with a flagrant insult to procedural law and rules of material law convicted by criminals in toga:

SSR Kazimierz Boycki II K 38/19
SSR Aneta Andel II K 38/20
Jack Kielar's SSR II K 851/18
SSR Joanna Dworzycka-Skrobowska II K 900/19

for crimes of criminals:

SSR Lucyna Domagała And all 3259/08
SSR of Paweł Siwka And all 3259/08
SSR of Paweł Wozniak And all 441/16
SSO Wojciecha Damasko (II Jun 222/18, II Jun 260/18, II Jun 5/18, II S 12/18, II S 16/18, II S 21/18, II S 8/19, II S 12/19, II S 14/19)
PPR Anna Sorowiak PR 3 Ds. 359/17 – II K 1423/18 – V KO 85/18 – II K 38/19(20),

The torturers of Grzegorz Niedźwiecki:

SSR Lucyna Domagała (And all 3259/08),
SSR Paweł Siwek (And all 3259/08),
SSR Paweł Wozniak (And all 441/16),
SSO Wojciech Damascus (II Part 222/18, II Part 260/18, II S 5/18, II S 12/18, II S 16/18, II S 21/18, II S 8/19, II S 12/19, II S 14/19),

PPO Grzegorz Chojnacki (3 Ds. 359.2017),
PPR Anna Surowiak (3 Ds. 359.2017),
SSN Michał Laskowski (V KO 85/18),
SSR Kazimierz Chodecki (II K 38/19),
SSR Aneta Andel (II K 38/20),
SSO Paweł Pratkowecki (IV Ka 436/20),
SSR Mariola Majer-Świrska (II K 38/19),
SSR Marian Janitor (1 Ko 16/22),
SSO Marek Poddębniak (IV Kzw 103/22),
SSR Monika Gliniecka-Kaczmarek (II 1.Ko 3557/22),
SSO Aleksander Żurakowski (IV Kzw 470/22),

PPR Maciej Bogucki (PR 3 Ds. 183/18),
SSN Piotr Mirek (V KO 86/18),
SSR Jacek Kielar (II K 851/18),

PPR Grażyna Tygielska-Białek (PR 1 Ds. 535/19),
SSR Joanna Dworzycka-Skrobowska (II K 900/19),
PSR Agnieszka Kałudna-Rudowicz (II K 900/19),
SSN Dariusz Kala (V KO 68/21).

The case was deemed to have been dealt with silently in a way which took full account of the party's request (silent consent):

There would be no Stalinist criminal proceedings II K 851/18, II K 38/19, II K 900/19 conducted in violation of the Polish Charter of the Rights of the Victim, from a flagrant insult to procedural law and the provisions of material law against the victim's conduct by 4444 days enforcement of the replacement act in a humiliating manner, contrary to the law (video resolution of the SN III CZP 23/06Legalis Number 74973), If the enforcement body, i.e. judges of the Jelenia Góra territory Court, respected the spirit and the letter of law and dismissed the creditor's application of 10 November 2008 from the execution of the replacement operation under the procedure Article 1050 kp.c.

Crimesters in NKVD robes stole 16 tons of life and wellness for no reason, humiliating an innocent man for his own crimes. Übermenschen, rectors, They dare to compose that right criticism contains insulting content.

– – – –

Analysis of a Fake Case II K 38/19 conducted in violation of the Polish Victim's Rights Charter

SSR in Legnica Kazimierz Chodecki issued a injunction on 12 March 2019 in the case II K 38/19 of a crime with Article 226(1) Even though there has been no insult of a public officer on duty.

SSR in Legnica Aneta Andel issued a hoodie judgement in the case of... II K 38/20 of a crime with Article 216(1), despite the absence of a complaint by a legitimate prosecutor for the offence of insulting a individual (see appeal) and the appearance of a private prosecutor at any main hearing.

PPR in Jelenia Góra Anna Surowiak filed an appeal on 3 November 2020 PR 3 Ds. 359.2017 Since SSR Aneta Andel changed the legal qualifications of the indictment, which does not have the powers of public prosecutor as justice in the case... II K 38/19.

SSO in Legnica Paweł Pratkovecki issued a judgement on 17 December 2020 IV Ka 436/20 keeping the sentence... II K 38/19, which did not fall (judgment of 24 September 2020) II K 38/20).

SSR in Legnica Mariola Majer-Świrska issued a resolution on 18 January 2021. II K 38/19 correcting an apparent clerical mistake in the signature of the case file given on Judgment The Legnica territory Court of 24.09.2020, not being a justice in the case II K 38/19 and after an abstract finalization by the appeal court of a non-existent judgement II K 38/19.

SSR in Legnica Marian Wozny issued a resolution on 15 February 2022. II.1 Ko 16/22 managing the execution of a replacement punishment of 50 days of unlawful imprisonment for an imaginary fine of PLN 2000 in total, disregarding the transitional phase of socially useful work and confusing the act for which Grzegorz Niedźwiecki was sentenced.

SSO in Legnica Marek Poddębniak issued a resolution on 20 April 2022. IV Kzw 103/22 amended the contested decision II.1 Ko 16/22 so that he replaced the alleged fine with 100 regular units of fines for 10 months of socially useful work of 20 hours per month.

SSR at Legnica Monika Gliniecka-Kaczmarek issued a resolution on 5 December 2022. II 1.Ko 3557/22 managing the order of the territory Court of Legnica to replace the execution of a replacement punishment of 50 days of unlawful imprisonment for socially useful work and order the execution of a replacement punishment of 50 days of unlawful imprisonment for an imaginary fine of PLN 2000, without a copy or an extract of the judgement to be enforced, with mention to the enforceability and, in the case of a final judgment, with the date of its finality, received from the criminal department in a manner Article 11 § 1 k.w.

SSO in Legnica Aleksander Żurakowski issued a resolution on 8 February 2023. IV Kzw 470/22 maintaining the contested SSR decision in Legnica Monika Gliniecka-Kaczmarek, ignoring the fact obligations of Grzegorz Niedźwiecki to pay the fine After the appeal court has completed the formal deficiencies and omitting absolute reasons for appeal specified in Article 439(1)(6), (7), (9) and (11) ori dic Article 17 § 1 points 1, 9-11 k.p.k.

By these methods General August Fieldorf “Nil” and Rotmaster Witold Pilecki were sentenced to the punishment of garbage.

"They must be convicted" – criminals' producers

5390 Day of panic – what my children did to you

https://grugorz-niedwiecki.hexcom.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/11-years-slavery.pdf

https://grugorz-nieświecki.hexcom.net/2016/11/16/poklosie-nothing/

https://grgorz-nieświecki.hexcom.net/dimension-injustice/

https://democracyandjustice.pl/dimension-injustice/

https://www.tribunal-national.pl/producers-criminals/

– – – –

If the present NKVD illegally deprives the victim of its own crimes, the following passive politicians will be charged

Art. 240. KK – Criminal non-notice of prohibited conduct

19 April 2022. – I request that this be sent immediately Petitionsto defend the regulation of law with active attachments to the hands of the following public officers, politicians and representatives of the authorities:

Andrzej Duda – president of the Republic of Poland
Mateusz Morawiecki – Prime Minister
Jarosław Kaczyński – Deputy Prime Minister of the Council of Ministers (President of Law and Justice)
Michał Wójcik – Minister – associate of the Council of Ministers
Zbigniew Ziobro – Prosecutor-General
Bogdan Święczkowski – National Prosecutor, Deputy lawyer General
Zbigniew Ziobro Minister of Justice
Michał Woś – Secretary of State at the Ministry of Justice
Marcin Warchol – Secretary of State, Plenipotentiary of the Government of Human Rights
Sebastian Kaleta – Secretary of State at the Ministry of Justice
Marcin Romanowski – Undersecretary of State in the Ministry of Justice
Catherine Frydrych – Undersecretary of State in the Ministry of Justice
Radosław Lung – Director-General of the Ministry of Justice
Luke Piebiak – erstwhile Undersecretary of State in the Ministry of Justice
Patrick Jako – associate of the European Parliament (former Secretary of State, Ministry)
Marcin Wiązek – Ombudsman

https://gragorz-niedwiecki.hexcom.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Petyce-to-author-highest-protection-state-law.pdf

Original judgement of 24 September 2020 of the Legnica territory Court with an alphanumeric mark II K 38/20, issued in violation of Article 439(1)(6), (7), (9) and (11) ori dic Article 17 § 1 points 1, 9-11 k.p.k.

A judgment, the operative part of which has not been signed by the composition of the court, does not be in the legal sense, is simply a defect so crucial that it deprives the judgement of legal existence.

Correcting an apparent clerical mistake in a criminal judgement or including a mention to correcting an apparent clerical mistake on the first of the judgement 3 months and 24 days after the judgement is published is inadmissible is simply a circumvention of the law, since a given judgement for its validity in the legal sense must be signed before the judgement is delivered. After the formal correction of the judgment, the appropriate marking of the judgment, the judgement would should be re-declared. These are the stages of the application of the law.

There are absolute grounds for appeal and proceedings II K 38/19 should be reopened on the basis of:

439 § 1 point 6 of the General Court. – decision II K 38/19not signed by the individual taking part in his announcement,
439 §1(7) k.p.k. – there is simply a contradiction in the content of the ruling, preventing its execution,
439 §1(9) k.p.k. – there is 1 of the circumstances which exclude the proceedings referred to in Article 17negative procedural conditions Paragraph 1, point (5), 6 and 8-11,
439 § 1 point 11 of the General Court. – the case was found in the absence of the accused (The submission was compulsory),
17 §1(9) k.p.k. – absence of a complaint by a legitimate prosecutor (see appeal),
17 §1(10) k.p.k. – the deficiency of the required authorisation to prosecute or to search prosecution from the rightholder, unless the law provides otherwise (the justice entered the public prosecutor's and private prosecutor's shoes),
17 §1(11) k.p.k. – there is another exclusion origin (lack of evidence of a public-scenario crime and deficiency of social interest in the ex officio prosecution of a private-scenario offence).

and dismiss proceedings on the basis of Article 17 §1(6) k.p.k. (there has been a limitation of criminality).

This is my bow to you.

On the same negative procedural grounds, it is besides appropriate to resume, of its own motion, the private proceedings II K 900/19.

He who claims to have no absolute appeal to resume proceedings II K 38/19 He's a public liar. Allowed Support. It does not undermine the conditions set out in Article 439(1)(6), (9) and (11) and negative procedural conditions specified in Article 17 § 1 points 1, 9-11 k.p.k. It does not respond in substance to the stated grounds. It does not prove that there is simply a signed judgement on the alphanumeric designation II K 38/19Which is binding. Does not prove that there is simply a complaint from a legitimate prosecutor. It does not justify its position due to the fact that there are no nonsubjective arguments and no willingness to respect the rules of operation of the State authorities and the work to comply with the law. It does not fulfill the function and duties of the judge, but defends the politically corrupt, corrupt sitva of the judge's prosecutor Agato Regulska. I committed to pay a fine of PLN 2000 in total, as you will issue me an executive title, i.e. legal judgement of 24 September 2020 on alphanumerical marking II K 38/19 (Article 113 kp.k.). He bows Article 157 § 1 k.p.k. and Article 11 § 1 k.w. and Article 19a(1) Goods and Services taxation Act.