School War for Attention in Europe: a change of approach to smartphones in education

Swedish schools Over the years, they have been a symbol of modern digital education. However, 1 of Europe's most technologically liberal systems has begun to rise increasing doubts after the worsening results of student concentration. From the next school year, compulsory schools will control to the strategy of answering telephone calls in the morning and donating them only after school. For a country that was a symbol of modern education, it was a immense cultural change that extended the discussion of smartphones at school for 2 years.

European Commission Report “Mobile telephone bans in schools across the EU” on the bans on mobile phones in schools shows that

In fresh years, Europe has clearly moved towards increasingly ruthless rules on smartphones in education.

Even a fewer years ago, decisions were left mostly to schools, and present more and more countries are introducing statutory solutions covering full education systems.

→ No smartphones in schools. The government adopted the bill – what next? •Rafał Górski

Dispersal epidemic

A symbol of a European change of approach to smartphones in schools is France.

The ban on telephones in French schools has existed since 2018, but only a restrictive pilot program that started in the fall of 2024 did quite a few work media confusion.

The minute was symbolic. In Europe, there has been an expanding debate on the "epidemia of distraction" and the impact of social media on children and young people. French media, and then practically all of Europe, began to study very intensively on the cases of schools receiving calls from students in the morning and giving them only after school. The subject was part of a wider debate on children's intellectual health, deteriorating youth position after a pandemic and addictive social media algorithms.

Countries introducing fresh rules in schools are not technologically backward.

This is the first argument to be put forward in the debate on technology reduction. specified a fear that we will rise a non-digital society and weaker in virtual life than abroad peers who have not been denied access... On the contrary, many of the countries that make specified a rigorous decision invest in AI, digitalisation of schools, and digital competence.

Rather, the dispute concerns whether a private smartphone is simply a good educational tool, and should the school defend students from the mechanisms of the economics of attention?

→ Screens in kindergartens. How a Digital Lobby Druges Children •Karol Dudek-Różycki, Rafał Górski

Phone in the break ≠ telephone ON the break!

France is 1 of Europe's more technologically powerful countries, with massive state investments in AI, cybersecurity and start-ups. Ba, Mistral AI — a French competitor of AI models — has even become a symbol of European technological ambitions. The state besides powerfully supports the improvement of data centres, has developed online administration, the ambition of digital sovereignty, and Paris is 1 of Europe's most crucial launch hubs.

At the same time, the French have a very strong tradition of state technology regulation and protecting citizens from the negative effects of the market.

This is evident not only in the case of telephones in schools, but besides in the regulation of net platforms, labour law and the protection of privacy and children.

Week of civilian Affairs

Since 2020 we have been discovering uncomfortable truths and announcing stories that have the power to change Poland.

Donate and become our contributor

France did not reject digital education. Schools inactive usage laptops, tablets, electronic journals or educational platforms.

What the fight began is an "attention economy", that is, the economics of attention.

School restrictions effort to defend education space from mechanisms competing for students' attention and against a model of platforms designed to attract maximum attention user. The French debate around the phones is not a "technology escape", it is an effort to regain control over the attention of children and young people.

The discussion has taken politicians a lot. The request for change was pressed by Emmanuel Macron's camp, and the subject was actively supported by the Minister of Education Élisabeth Borne. This resulted in the "Portable en pause" program, during which in 180 schools students had to return their phones in the morning to peculiar lockers or boxes and retrieved them only after school. It was not only a ban on use, it was a physical separation of children from smartphones for a full school day. Critics utilized arguments too much control of everyday life, hard contact with the parent and expanding logistical problems of the operation (shafts, covers, retention systems and even hiring additional staff).

Green wave of restrictions

However, the results of the task were large because

media They talked about calmer breaks, better communication between students, better concentration and little cyber-violence, so a minute later the green wave of limiting smartphones flooded all over Europe.

→ Crisis of Finnish education. Are you certain this is simply a model for Poland? •Justyna Pierzyńska

Most European education systems do not search to completely cut students off from technology. The dominant model is the alleged conditional restrictions, i.e. prohibitions with exceptions to wellness needs, pupils with peculiar educational needs or teaching situations controlled by the teacher. The exception remains more stringent Italian solutionswhere smartphones are banned even for educational purposes (quizes, translations, plan works or calculator). Hungary is another country where a reasonably strict approach has been chosen. There, students of all types of schools — from simple school to vocational and secondary school — must return their phones at the beginning of the school day of the designated adult. The devices are closed and the students only recover after the last lesson.

Interestingly, the restrictions even apply to teachers there — they besides cannot usage phones privately while working.

The fresh rules improved the quality of teacher work. In addition to improving concentration and atmosphere, less distractions and easier keeping students' attention, the regulations limiting the usage of smartphones reduced professional stress. The fear of recording during lessons, taking pictures without permission, or publishing material online has disappeared. There have been times erstwhile teachers felt force to "competition" for students' attention with applications designed specifically to make users dependent on screens and this component from their work disappeared.

However, implementing the fresh rules is not easy.

Where schools had time to prepare, consult parents and students and appropriate infrastructure, regulations were adopted more calmly.

→ The impact of smartphones on youth improvement in the light of the latest investigation from 2024 to 2025 •Monica the Visitor

Countries operating rapidly and centrally experienced the chaos, conflict and opposition of students. In both policy options, there were signs that teachers did not want to be “police”, and rebellious students were able to absorb a immense amount of time and energy from all school staff.

Quoted Before report The European Commission besides signals that the fast "discontinuation of technology" can have the effect of replacing teenagers, the alleged substitution effect. It turned out that in schools where phones were banned, but students were left with tablets or laptops, any youths simply carried their distractions to another devices. Social media, communicators, videos and games were launched on tablets, Chromebooks, or another digital devices. The unwanted component so remained, only the carrier was changed!

Social reasoning about technology in education is changing rapidly.

Many schools have digitized education over the years, distributed laptops and encouraged online work, and now the same educational systems are trying to limit the effects of excessive screens. telephone bans can aid organizationally and psychologically, but they themselves do not solve the deeper problem of the culture of permanent digital stimulation.

The school should teach digital hygiene, make self-control, explain the mechanisms of social platforms, but who should be liable for awareness and how much can we influence the generation born in the digital age?

No 1 has any uncertainty that time works against concentration, relation and offlineness.