Vaccination against COVID-19 and cancer signals after infection: assessment of patterns and possible biological mechanisms
Summary
More and more peer-reviewed publications study that various types of cancer happen in temporal association with vaccination or COVID-19 infection. In order to characterise the nature and scope of these reports, a systematic review of the literature was carried out from January 2020 to October 2025, on the basis of circumstantial eligibility criteria. The inclusion criteria met a full of 69 publications: 66 reports at the level of articles describing 333 patients from 27 countries, 2 retrospective population studies (Italy: cohort ~300,000 people and Korea: cohort ~8.4 million people) quantifying the incidence trends for cancer and mortality among vaccinated populations and 1 longitudinal analysis covering ~1.3 million American soldiers, covering periods before the pandemic to post-pandemic. Most studies documented haematological malignancies (non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, skin lymphomas, leukaemias), solid tumours (breasts, lungs, melanoma, sarcoma, pancreatic cancer and glioblastoma multiforme) and viral-related tumours (Kaposi's cancer and Merkla cell cancer).
Reports have revealed respective recurring threads: (1) highly fast progression, recurrence or reactivation of a pre-existing, indolent or controlled disease, (2) atypical or localized histopathological results, including seizure of the injection sites of vaccine or regional lymph nodes, and (3) proposed immune links between acute infection or vaccination and tumour sleep, immune strategy escape or microenvironment lesions. Most cases and early population data observations indicate early detection of possible safety signals. These results item the request for rigorous epidemiological, longitudinal, clinical, histopathological, forensic and mechanistic studies to measure whether and under what conditions vaccination or COVID-19 infection may be associated with cancer.
https://www.oncotarget.com/article/28824/text/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41498242/
Published January 3 Reviewed survey in Magazine Oncotargetdoes something that has actually been banned over the past fewer years: systematically catalogues cases of cancer associated with vaccination against or infection with COVID-19, and then asks whether vaccination with mRNA can be the cause. In addition, it proposes a biological mechanics of action. Work fragment:
In addition, mRNA vaccines against COVID work by instructing mark cells to produce SARS-CoV-2 protein. This is done by introducing a synthetic, modified mRNA (mod-mRNA) that incorporates unnatural pseudouridine into its coding region to prolong the stableness of mRNA beyond natural mRNA. The introduction of mod-RNA is done utilizing lipid-based transfaction in the form of lipid nanoparticles (LNP). The consequence is simply a highly efficient mod-mRNA transfection to mark cells with biochemical and pharmacological behaviour another than naturally occurring mRNA. As a result, mod-RNA is transcribed to abroad spike protein (as well as another protein products with a shifted frame), which induces a strong immune consequence [98–102]. Given the stableness of pseudouridine modified mRNA, together with residual DNA in mRNA formulations [103–108], mRNA vaccines supply exogenous genetic material (DNA and RNA (as modified nucleic acids) to the patient's cells. MRNA vaccines against COVID-19 produce protein Spike, which is encoded by unchangeable mRNA and, as has been shown, is long-lasting in the human body [109, 110]. These elements of nucleic acid have been reported to contribute to post-covidic syndrome (PCVS/PVS) [110, 111]. Therefore, these vaccines become a definition of gene therapy. [112, 113]. Despite this, the EU is making efforts to modify the definition of gene therapy to exclude mRNA vaccines from this category [114].
The online publication immediately met with massive hack attacks. due to them, there was no access to the magazine website for a long time. It could not be reached by those curious or, worse, by a search engine. The full communicative is rather detailed in the regular Mail.
The force of attacks decreased erstwhile the FBI handled the case and the work was additionally published in respective sites on the network, including the government base PubMed. However, just in case I usage the file sharing option that Substack gives. curious parties may download the publication here:
There are 2 reasons why large pharmaceutical companies, in addition to the implementation of a standard strategy of slander to slander authors and to challenge the conclusions of the study, have reached digital force to prevent access to work.
The first reason is that investigation authors are not marginal characters, so it is hard to question their competence. Dr. Charlotte Kuberwasser is an older oncological biologist at Tufts University whose investigation focuses on tumor microenvironments, metastasis and interactions between the immune strategy and cancer. Dr. Wafik S. El-Deira is simply a long-standing oncologist and investigator of molecular cancer at Brown University, erstwhile president of the American Cancer investigation Association, and a major authority in p53 signalling and cancer therapy.
In another words, they are recognized scientists whose work is to detect early cancer signals, so they know precisely what they're doing. The article went through a thorough review process and was only published after a year, including 5 months of waiting after acceptance.
The second and possibly more crucial reason is that researchers have analyzed 69 peer-reviewed publications from 27 different countries, covering 333 patients and respective extended population data sets, and have proven recurring patterns that simply cannot be ignored:
extremely fast progression of cancer,
reactivation of a previously controlled disease,
unusual clusters of tumors close injection sites or lymph nodes that drain the lymph, and
striking overrepresentation of lymphomas, leukaemias, aggressive solid tumours and viral-induced cancers.
To criticize this article, the scientists of the company would besides gotta criticize 69 erstwhile reviewed articles and investigation on multimillion-dollar populations. The motives for specified action would be besides obvious, and on the another hand all erstwhile studies would be highlighted.
Threats in this case could not be effective either due to the advanced professional standing of authors or due to the changed political situation. At the time of the pandemic, it was not a problem to put force on institutions to release the insubordinate or at least to deprive them of their funds due to the fact that the government Biden autopen hand-in-hand with pharmaceutical companies. After a change of power, institutions utilizing the large Pharmacy must face consequences in the form of audits, suspension of national backing and judicial processes.
Instead, Pfizer reached for the carrot, offering the authors lucrative jobs for stopping further digging into the subject. In itself, this is simply a confirmation of the rightness of work. Would Pfizer want to hire them if they were writing nonsense?
At least 1 of the authors, rejecting the proposal, openly shared information about it, publishing the following fragments of the letter received from the recruiter of Pfizer. specified a coincidence, the work was published on 3 January, and Pfizer expressed interest in the author on 5 January.
Wafik S. El-Deiry
It is ironic to receive a message from a recruiter named Pfizer on 5 January 2026. However, I am not curious in moving to work in Pfizer.
Dear Wafif,
I hope that this message finds you in good wellness and that you enjoy the vacation season. I realise that at this time of year it frequently promotes reflection, household meetings and well-deserved remainder from the challenges of our working life. Though I full respect the importance of specified moments, I felt obliged to contact, especially given the current situation in our industry. As I approached the fresh Year, I noticed that many experienced leaders, including the Lord, are thoughtfully analyzing their next chapters, and Pfizer wants to make contact with exceptional talents at this critical time.
Pfizer is presently undergoing a strategical transformation, as any long-term leaders leave for various reasons, specified as relocation, seeking fresh challenges, or simply re-evaluating the career path. In this context, we deliberately and selectively implement innovation, aiming to accomplish crucial results. Your extended experience in oncology and your remarkable academic and investigation improvement way truly stand out, making you the perfect candidate for our strategical priorities, especially in the context of our commitment to developing fresh therapies and personalisation of cancer therapies.
And so on, so on. The full entry is here:
By translating the slimy text into human language:
We're not asking you, Doctor, to break your rules and tell people that mRNA vaccines are safe. We're asking you to halt remembering this ancient vaccination story. We want a man of specified extraordinary talents and competences to work where he will truly aid people. You're gonna have a billion-dollar investigation budget, cure cancer, and make yourself incredibly rich.
Without a uncertainty Wafik S. El-Deira is an different personality. How many would defy specified temptation?
This reminds me of Matthew (4: 8-10).
8 Finally, the devil took Jesus up to the advanced mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world, in all their splendor.
9 — All this will be yours—he said—if you worship me.
10 “Go away, Satan!” Jesus ordered.
Apage Satana Pfizer
Thank you for reading Substack Jack! Subscribe for free to receive fresh posts and support my work.