It is not fresh that mainly the Western press is transforming history, defaming Poles – this is simply a highly harmful thing for us and the appropriate institutions should be afraid with responding to proclaiming the apparent historical untruth.
In addition to articles in which the etymology of the word Nazi is deliberately changing, we are dealing with movie productions which are allegedly based on historical facts and in fact spread a false image. A large part of youth educates and I make historical opinions on specified pashquila as the late released series “Our Mothers, Our Fathers”.
As it is widely known, the lie repeated a 1000 times, yet becomes the fact and people gradually begin to believe that Poles are liable for starting II WW, that they have established concentration camps [even the camp in Dachau was called Polish] and that it is the Polish nation that is liable for the Holocaust and the death of millions of human lives. This is dangerous all the more due to the fact that there are less eyewitnesses and the field for shameful maneuvering for historical speculators is increasing.
This is simply a conscious action of German propaganda supported by Zionist compensation scammers with the aid of which The Germans whitewash their participation in crimes and throw work for planet War II at the expense of Poland. First a fresh nation was created, which was called Nazis, so they were not Germans and Nazis – now not even Nazis and Poles are being accused – and so successively we decision forward with any dynamics.
Current Resolution of the Polish Question
“What a blessing I have done to you,Do you hatred me so much?”(old rabbinic wisdom).
On May 21 of that year [1994], in "Solidarity Week", I accused Adam Michnik, his komiltons and his followers of practicing shameless anti-Polish racism. Shameless means disgraceful and sly. Shameful, for all racism is shameful, according to Napoleon's words: “All racism is madness and scum.”
And sly, for the practice of a thief's method, who, having committed theft, shouts, "Get the thief!" and distracts himself. Michnikists, practicing antipolonism, shout at the accounts of anti-Semitism in Poland, which creates their sick mentality, according to the Nobel novelist Isaac Bashevis Singer: “The modern hebrew cannot live without anti-Semitism. If anti-Semitism does not be somewhere, he will make it.”
Thus, for the first time a year ago (“Lysius in pages 2”) and for the second time, more and more accurately motivated, in the above-mentioned issue of “Tysola”, the word for racism was utilized as an accusation against authentic racists. The fact struck a lie upon the 1 carrying the mask of truth, and to those for whom truthfulness is simply a mask ball danced on the grave of ethics and moral sensitivity. A simple thing was named after a name. Why is it due to me? due to the fact that individual had to do it.
There is — or should be — the limit of everything. Borders of slandering Poles with alleged anti-Semitism were crossed erstwhile Polish and abroad media held in their hands Jews have launched the thesis that it is anti-Semitism of genocide. Over the Vistula River, Michnik's paper announced that the Akovists during the Warsaw Uprising were active in murdering the survivors of Ghetto.
Over the Seine, Thames, Padem, Hudson and another rivers of the West, judaic and alleged "liberal" newspapers and speakers tell the planet that the Holocaust was partially Polish (or mostly Polish) work. This long-standing campaign, which has late been rapidly dynamized, is simply killing the good name of a nation, which for respective centuries gave the only safe refuge to Jews oppressed in another European countries, and which during the German business spilled quite a few blood protecting (hiding or bouncing) Jews exterminated mercilessly with the hands of “superhumans” who had swastikas where people have hearts. The old judaic wisdom asks, “What blessing have I done to you that you hatred me so much?”
Another judaic proverb — “Though they are to kill you, don’t go beyond certain limits” — should be utilized to discourage any judaic writer from defaming Poles. But I must be discouraged from writing this article by the pasty of quoted maxim: do not exceed certain limits, for they will kill you! It's the limits of meek silence erstwhile you're beaten by Jews. 1 word of protest means civilian death. In “Better” (1990) I wrote:
"Any controversy with authors of the chosen thinkers brings to man the charge of anti-Semitism, with which the charge cannot be disputed at all, due to the fact that all word of opposition automatically confirms the accusing thesis, according to this ritual (known to cinematographers and readers of detective novels) of the conviction erstwhile arrested: «Every word you now say will be utilized against you».
But I'm going to say a fewer words to them, due to the fact that you can't spit the spitter's spit, swallow it calmly, or just wipe it, or pretend it's a summertime rain. erstwhile the head of the Israeli state threw a calumny in the face of the head of the Polish state, that Pole drinks anti-Semitism with his mother's milk, our president took this poisonous saliva without saying a word of protest.
So I will answer by giving myself the right to talk on behalf of the full nation, that is, on behalf of all honest Pole, and for the credo of this speech I take the Druidic motto: “Truth Against the World!”. Bombastic words, I know. But erstwhile bad people set your home on fire with a rag as gruesome as a false memory of the “Shoah”, you gotta preach the alarm utilizing a large bell. And I have the right to be a bell ringer. In the “Landless Islands”, I published a photograph of a few-year-old judaic boy, a photograph taken at the Nazi extermination camp.
And in “Better” I said that how many times do I watch this photograph, so many times I feel judaic — “for the remainder of my life, no photograph will teardrop my heart as it does; this small 1 is my son.” So now that the villains are lying that my grandparents and my fathers, my grandmothers and my mothers, murdered this child, I have a work to shoot the lie with the fact about the real Holocaust accomplices.
During the first postwar decade, the fact about the “Final Solution of the judaic Question” by the Germans was widely known and widely acknowledged, clear to everyone. In the second decade there were revisionists-hochsztaplers who, utilizing the fact that time blurs the past and makes past cloudy with water for fishing dirty fish, began to disavow the truth. These were 2 groups of people who hated each another — people on both sides of the barricade.
The anti-Semitic group promoted the thesis that crematoria and gas chambers did not be in Nazi camps, but were built after the war by the Allied and judaic to compromise the Germans, ergo: these camps were not death factories, no mass demolition was planned there. Although a well-known British historian (Irving) was a liar, they were widely regarded as philonazist aberrations, so even a fewer years ago, to verify the number of the Oświęcim dead (instead of 4.5 million “only” a small over 1 million people) did not give the bleachers the Hitlerian wind-death device a sail.
Meanwhile, the revisionism of the second group of liars, the judaic group, which burdened the Polish nation with co-responsibility for the Holocaust, did a career without hindrance, implanting a false historical imagination — awareness of the Polish genocide.
The first phase — the kindergarten of giant blaga — was “not guilty.” Poles were referred to as disgraceful indifference to the massacre of Jews, to the slaughter that took place in Poland, and thus in front of Poles, which was interpreted as: with the approval of Poles.
The second phase consisted of an escalation of charges: Poles, anti-semites “en gros”, felt glad that individual was making order with Jews, especially Polish peasants, who willingly helped in this work. The voices of Jews whose Polish peasantry saved (voices saying that full villages knew who hid the Jews and no 1 gave them up) were treated as votes of the castaways and madmen—mysigene. The peasants did not end up being accused more and more of all Poles – all Polish goys were offered cooperation with the German doctrine and practice of genocide.
These preliminary stages of defamation of the Polish nation are the second half of the 1950s and 1960s, and the defaming texts appeared mainly in Israel. I quote a few:
"The majority of Christian people in Poland were willing to cooperate with Germany, driven by the desire for blood and the senseless hatred of Jews. Jews who managed to escape German were brutally murdered by Polish peasants or handed over by them to the Gestapo. And even those peasants who chose to hide Jews would sooner or later execution them to rob property. So all escape options were blocked from the very beginning by the hostile population"
("Yad Washem Studies", 1957).
“Why has Polish land become a gallows for Jews? Did Hitler accidentally choose Poland for this? Didn’t anti-Semitism affect Hitler’s decision?”
(article Chaima Jaanvi in Israeli regular paper “Dawar”, 1958).
“The population of hundreds of Polish cities has collaborated with Germany in murdering Jews and robbing judaic property... Most of the Polish population actively or passively helped Germany destruct the judaic people and seize judaic property”
(Israeli diary “Lecte Najes”, 1960).
“Polish collaborators of various ointments dishonored the name of the Polish people, trying to cooperate in the extermination of Jews to gain the favour of the Nazi group”
Israeli historians then expressed courts only a small subdued compared to the scream of Israeli mass-medias. I quote the work of Nahum Blumental and Joseph Kermish (Resistence in the Warsaw Ghetto, a Documentary History), Jerusalem 1965:
"The relation of all layers of Polish society to the persecution of Jews by the German occupier was fundamentally indifferent. To our regret, Polish society looked with complete calmness at the execution of Jews. Most of the Polish population, blinded in their Catholic views, treated the extermination of Jews as a just punishment for the crucifixion of Jesus. Others, more sober, would call it mass murder, but treated it as a right solution, which would later be a blessing for the reborn Polish state. Even Poles who are opponents of the fascist government and who are active in the armed conflict with the occupier shared this anti-Jewish court, claiming that in liberated Poland a monument would should be erected to Hitler for the liberation of it from the Jews."
Lying idiots of this kind, and the accusations of “cooperation” or “active help” cited above, were inactive in the second phase “non-threatening” due to the fact that they were only heard in Israel and inside the judaic diaspora centres. But the 3rd phase (1970s) brought a fresh quality of slanderous run — it was incorporated into the worldwide IT strategy [information], and the degree of escalation reached the charge that the full Polish nation actively participated in genocide, among others, thanks to its underground structures, specified as the National Army. No 1 wanted to hear that Polish
The Underground State has definitely sentenced the Home Army to death and hands to destruct anyone who helped the Germans capture the Jews.
The exact other of thesis was laminated, and everywhere, including in exotic countries where the Holocaust didn't care about anyone. For example: A.D. 1978 Brazilian weekly “Manchete” printed Isaac Kawa's text about “Nazi guerrillas from the Polish Home Army who murdered Jews”.
Pan-World spread of calumnia would have been besides mediocre audibility if it were limited to information by the media. So art was tied. Literature (a multitude of anti-Polish novels, among others, from the feathers of celebrated writers specified as Leon Uris or William Styron, a giant advertising run around the “Male Bird” Kosiński, etc.) and a movie (among others, Pashquil Lanzmann “Shoah” or a loud series “Holocaust” where Jews shoot people in Polish uniforms with eagles on caps).
The 4th phase (the 1980s and 90s) became the phase of the next escalation. A ghostly melody is played, it would seem impossible to play in a rational planet — that Poles were the main exterminators of Jews! Will phase 5 be possible? The 5th phase could, for example, accuse Poles of crucifixion of Christ (notabene 1 of the alleged ‘polish jokes’, Polesic jokes, which serially are produced by American Jews, says that “Christ was crucified by drunken Poles). Kosher morality knows no bounds.
Let's go back to phase three. At this 3rd phase of escalation of paranoia aimed at Poles began to execute characteristic juggling terminology. It was a semantic trick, as though not significant, but indeed of large importance. The word Germany was replaced by the word Nazis. A fewer examples:
"Nazis and Poles murdered Jews during planet War II".
‘The Edmonton Journal’;
“Poles did it as Nazis allied”
‘Shoah Memorandum’;
“The Nazi Gestapo had best friends among Polish anti-Semites”
‘The judaic Week’;
“Poles murdered more Jews during the war than Nazis”
"Canadian judaic News".
Three of the 4 above examples are Canadian texts, whose choice was reprinted by Piotr Wierzbicki's “Gazeta Polska”, but the frequency of specified statements, in Canada is indeed alarming (I was in Canada 3 months ago and I saw it with my own eyes), in the USA is much larger, due to the fact that there are more judaic and left-wing media there. These media gradually eliminated the Germans as authors of the Holocaust, replacing them with Nazis, later Nazis and Poles, and yet more and more Poles, a bright symbol of which is terminology concerning extermination camps, which evolved so:
- 1. "German concentration camps".
- 2. "Nazi concentration camps".
- 3. "Nazistow-Polish concentration camps".
- 4. "Polish concentration camps".
The last, 4th term, present the most fashionable, regularly utilized by Western media, is part of the 4th phase of the anti-Polish run on the issue of "Shoah". Poles were promoted to major Jews here.
"Death camps were managed by Poles";
"Oświęcim is simply a symbol of the genocide of the barbarians of Poles who murdered Jews";
"The blood of the Jews is primarily on Poles";
"Oswiecim and Treblinka are mainly liable for the Polish people".
“The National Army was a genocide anti-Jewish organization exterminating Jews under the screen of anti-German activity”, etc., etc.
One can quote indefinitely, especially from the Western alleged cultural judaic press, which, however, shapes the opinions of journalists known, multi-faceted writings. These media receive and advance 2 types of "proofs": a preliminary quote from "Jewish Press", "Jewish Week",
"Jewish News", "Jewish Gazette", "Jewish Time", "Jewish Mail", "Jewish Messenger", "Jewish Globe", etc., and the second, confirming, are many letters coming to the editors and published from "eye witnesses", an old-fashioned method that allows to "provide" all thesis, though highly absurd. Styron's literary invention that the Polish prof. designed gas chambers and crematoria for the extermination of Jews, becomes a "scientific" thesis. The nonsense that “Poles have fallen in the blood of Jews” (The judaic Times) is simply a dogma. Question: “Can there be anything more natural than hating Polish murderers?” (‘B-nai B-rith Messenger’) sounds like a credo.
Unfortunately, Western public opinion buys these lies. This is an opinion which, according to the "political correctness" directives, has already been so much and so morally relativised that it will buy any nonsense, to swallow all mixture prepared by mass-media owners. A survey in France ("Le Monde") showed that for French women "the image of an elegant SSman with a whip is something very sexually appealing". This image matches the gas chamber and the crematorium soot badly; the image of Polish sleaze-antisemity is “comme il faut”.
In east Europe, where Germany has committed genocide, the revised version by the Holocaust at least temporarily has no chance. besides many people inactive remember that reality and teach their children the fact about it. Nevertheless, attempts at a scam are already being made today.
Michnik's “Docmental” lecture on the execution of Jews with Akovists is intended to form the evidence layer of the thesis promoted in the West that “AK was a genocide anti-Jewish organization” ("New York Times Book Review"). besides in the question of the “Polish extermination camps” Michnik was arguing, saying (when talking to German Habermas):
“Before Hitler came here, we started our own concentration camp.” It is music for the ears of the Germans and confirmation for judaic manipulators who say that “Poles gave Hitler encouragement to build death camps”
("The London Free Press").
These “numbers” of Michnik, of course, call out objections, but, as I have already said, all word of opposition in the fight for its own good name against judaic slanderers is ruthlessly utilized for even greater fattening of the victim.
The main Canadian newspaper, “Toronto Star”, writes: “The genocide committed on Jews is justified by Poles rationalizing them, and thus completely free themselves of guilt”. A Pole reading it wipes square eyes and feels a associate in a nightmare dream, a spectator of a schizophrenic horror show on the horizon.
This horror has all the features of Katyn's case. Communist propaganda lied for half a century, attributing the Russian crime to the Germans, even though in the West there were (and were printed) papers about the real perpetrators of the hecatomba. besides in the substance of actual Holocaust co-winners, honest Jews have long published documentary works (H. G. Adler, “Theresienstadt 1941-1945”, Tubingen 1955; R. Hilberg, “The demolition of the European Jews”, Chicago 1961) — indicating Jews. A prominent philosopher, polytholist and sociologist, author of specified renowned works as “The Origins of Totalitarianism” or “The Human Condition”, a large judaic woman of independent thought, Hannah Arendt (1906-75), 30 years ago dared to shout out to the full planet the fact that individual outside the judaic community would not dare whisper, even though they had tons of evidence-documents to support this thesis. What thesis? That without the active cooperation of the Holocaust Jews was impossible in any way! Technical, logistical, organizational, everyone. Arendt called her brothers the chief guilty of the Holocaust! I quote from her accusation:
“For the hebrew the crucial function of Jews in the extermination of the judaic people is the darkest card of the «Shoah»... The Germans have done many things, not only in the countries occupied by themselves, but besides allied, to avoid complications and chaos. Legal experts have formulated appropriate confiscation (Jewish) and evacuation (export) legislation. The Ministry of Finance was in charge of immense spoils, and watches, valuables and gold teeth were sorted in the Reich Bank and returned to the Prussian State Mint.
The Ministry of Communications made certain that the war needs did not limit the rolling stock planned for exports and that the timetable of judaic transports did not interfere with the timetable of another trains. Eichmann's men set precise numerical parameters for each transport and supervised collection and loading.
The judaic police themselves... She was irreplaceable in this respect, kept order, diligently caught fugitives, without her everything would fall apart, chaos would destruct the full operation."
Here I interrupt for a moment, to note that in the question of judaic SS collaborators, Gestapo and another Nazi services there is rich literature in Poland and in the world. Jews from ghettos, chroniclers and diaries, compose "expressis verbis" that the atrocities of the judaic Gendarmerie, Ordnungs-Hüter, far exceeded the atrocities of the Germans, Ukrainians and Latvians; that the judaic brigades of Gestapo (according to the Act of the AK Delegation on the Country — 1378 people; together, the Gestapo had over 8,000 judaic collaborators in Warsaw alone!) carried out appalling things as a associate of the Sonderkommando AS Hauptsturmfuhrer Spilker; that the famed judaic “Trzysnat” (Ganzwajcha and Szterfeld's team), catching Jews for export, auctioned in crimes on their own people with the judaic police Shenkman and Lejkin; etc. All European cities and towns where the Jews lived saw this — the export of Jews carried out by judaic officials. However, prof. Arendt's accusations are not directed mainly against these policemen, or method contractors. As well as not against the judaic services in the extermination camps, although it besides denounces this cooperation:
“Every murderous act in the extermination camps was the work of the judaic brigades — this fact was clearly established. The Jews served gas chambers and crematoria, ripped out dead people's teeth and cut off their hair, buried remains of the corpse, and dug mass graves to cover up traces of genocide. It is besides known that gas chambers were built by judaic technicians (e.g. in Teresin). All of this was monstrous, but it is not a moral problem...’.
The essences of Hannah Arendt's moral problem touched by rolling
Accusation not against judaic “arms”, but against judaic “brains” — against judaic leaders:
“The judaic submission alone was not adequate for the Germans. It would be besides weak to destruct the large difficulties that made it hard to implement the “Final Solution” to take place throughout Europe... Eichmann, simply enough, did not anticipate the Jews to express enthusiasm for their own destruction, but wanted them to show more than submission. He wanted their cooperation in genocide. And what is truly peculiar, the Jews did not neglect him!
Without their help, he did not have a chance of smooth implementation of «Shoah»... It was about interacting with the Nazi device of the extermination of judaic leaders who enjoyed large authority among the people, about cooperation which Germany considered to be the foundation of all their judaic politics... The Jews in all place they lived had local leaders, and everywhere, almost without exception, these leaders were eager to cooperate with the Nazis, forming judaic Councils (Judenrats) which led the export...
As officers of these Councils, the judaic leaders were given large power, and in the manifestos they wrote (probably by inspiration but not by dictatorship of the Nazis), there is simply a real satisfaction in gaining this power... Without much cooperation between the judaic Councils, it would be impossible to execution so many Jews."
Prof. Arendt's presentation of the terrible fact dared (a year later) the Israeli paper “Cherut” to supplement the accusing speech with the text “The justice Will Be History...” (1964):
"How do we explain the fact that Zionist leaders in Palestine were silent? Why didn't they rise a scream all over the world? With their silence, they worked together to a lesser degree than these mediocre men — the heads and members of the Judenrats — who provided German with letters of doom... These cowards kept quiet in their holes, knowing precisely the full truth, which was a large aid to the Nazis. So erstwhile past is judged by Judenrats and judaic police, it will besides justice Zionist leaders.”
The voice published in "Cherut" had only local coverage. Hannah Arendt's text had global coverage. In fact, we should not quote parts of this text as I did, but the full “Eichmann in Jerusalem. A study on the Banality of Evil (1963) — a full full of drastic details of the cooperation of Jews and Germans in the execution of the people of Isaac, Jacob and Abraham (although there is simply a deficiency of equally precise information about the trade which circles of wealthy Jews surviving in Switzerland and non-European countries led with the Nazis, buying out what is greater and richer Jews). The act of accusation so uncompromisingly and so honestly by the judaic woman, and besides the figure so important, by the student of planet publicity, shook the Jews. She was given a full war; dozens of articles and respective books loudest were J. Robinson's book, 1965) mixed it with mud, which she herself called "a brutal run against the fact about «Shoah»".
Today's phase of the same run is simply a grueling resolution Jews of the Polish issue utilizing lies about Polish co-participation (or main participation) in the collective morde on Jews. Oświęcim was built for Poles, and only 2 years later the mass Jews began to be brought there — present Jews claim that it was built and directed by Poles. The National Army as could have helped Jews and the Warsaw Ghetto — present Jews say it was an anti-Jewish genocide organization. Poles hid and saved hundreds, if not thousands of Jews, frequently paying for it with their own lives present Jews claim that Poles murdered millions of Jews.
The film's monument was made in Hollywood by a German shrewd man who saved Jews for money, valuables and sex. Oscars made Schindler on all continents gain fame as a monopolistic angel of salvation, a fame of the only righteous, which saved Jews whom Poles hated (why Polish children do not fetinate in this movie of the Holocaust, and don't Nazi torturers talk Polish in this film?). Schindler's saving monopoly has already been immortalized by the "kakawal" very popular among Western intellectuals:
“You were on Schindler’s List?
- No, I don't.
– How did you survive?”
Surveys of Western centres show that almost a 3rd of young Western people, erstwhile asked: who murdered Jews during the planet War?, answers: Poles. It's today. Our grandchildren will hear that the Germans created ghettos to defend Jews from the genocide anti-Semitism of Poles, but any of the ancients went to Polish camps, where
They were gassed.
“Talmud” says:
“He who slanders, and he who hears the talk, he who bears witness falsely against another, is worthy to be thrown to the dogs, as it is said: “Throw him to the dog”, and next to it it is said: “You shall not spread false news.”
And he says, "Talmud,"
“For it is said, “You will shun the lie”
("Szevuot" 30)*.
Waldemar Bald
The first print of “SOLIDARITY TYGONIK” dated 24 June 1994; “Lysiak in the pages and interview-row 3”, Warsaw 1995, pp. 63-72.
* Oh, yeah * - Crowd. Simon Datner and Anna Kamieńska.
