Sustainable improvement is the euphemism of the full social revolution. The consequence will be pauperizing the society that will be watched at all turn to put out any rebellion in the embryo.
Sustainable improvement is something another than optimal development, the fastest which, through the free market, can supply society with expanding prosperity. Sustainable improvement is simply a improvement not driven by marketplace forces and participants in this marketplace – companies and consumers, but by planners and another officials. It's a stunted, licensed development. "Sustainable improvement is another name for the thought of the government managing the economy. If improvement is to be balanced, it must be planned by the central planner, otherwise it cannot be done. It's nothing but a commune. The 4th Reich [the future European Union] must not disagree specifically from the 3rd Reich, and the 3rd Reich was a socialist state, as we can see from reading the memoirs of Albert Speer, who had to know something about the 3rd Reich," says editor Stanisław Michalkiewicz.
Carbon footprint with a fresh idol
Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki changes sustainable improvement through all cases. And it's not a coincidence. This is due to the fact that sustainable improvement policy is an agenda of the UN, but besides of the European Union. This is the eventual nonsubjective of Brussels. The fresh idol became the alleged carbon footprint, and by 2050 the EU economy is to be zero-emission. The EU institutions, specified as the European Parliament, the European Commission and the European economical and Social Committee, will win in this policy. Unfortunately, sustainable improvement was besides included in the Polish Constitution (Article 5). In addition, Article 2 of this basic law, and Article 20 of the Social marketplace Economy, refers to the sustainable improvement of social justice.
Sustainable improvement seeks not to increase prosperity and social justice, which has small to do with actual justice. Realising social justice means that the most benefit is not for those who work the most. He will not get even proportionally more than what he does not do. The most industrious will be taken the most to give much of it to the 1 who does nothing. Sustainable improvement de facto inhibits economical development. In specified a situation, no 1 pays to work and invest more, since he will not be able to benefit from the fruits of his own effort.
"All supporters of the alleged sustainable improvement combine a utilitarian approach and belief that they will be able to build a global balance strategy in which the population will be stabilised, as well as the level of production and consumption. Not only do they reject the paradigms of economical improvement and innovation, but they besides do not accept the current level of the world's population. A balanced population, in their imagination of the future world, should necessarily be lower than today," writes Agnieszka Stelmach in his introduction to his study Sustainable development. The spell of globalists, the instrument of full enslavement.
What's the point?
"The sustainable improvement programme, which has been under way for a long time, is intended to aid Western countries keep control of the planet economy, as developing countries rapidly catch up on the distance they have been sharing," says Stelmach. This is why the European Union needs the European Green Deal. Thanks to it, poorer countries, specified as Poland, have been forced to abandon the natural materials they have in abundance (stone and lignite coal), for natural materials that they do not have (preliminarily natural gas and then uranium) and for cheaper coal-based energy, which they could usage not only on site, producing inexpensive goods, but besides could export. Dr. Tomasz Sommer, editor-in-chief of the weekly “The top Time!” in social media asks, “Why did the Polish political class destruct energy? due to the fact that the Germans gave a fewer bucks? The nonsubjective of all these “green orders” is, in fact, 1 thing – to artificially rise energy prices in Poland, so that Poland does not gain on its exports. And the price of Polish energy from lignite coal is actually more than 10 times lower than the prices we are presently recording. The Germans came up with a satanic thought – they would destruct Polish coal energy, and in return sale us Russian gas. It'll control us. Matthew Morawiecki agreed. And Kaczyński didn't protest. This was a simultaneous surrender to both Germany and Russia. Now, in connection with the war, this plan has collapsed. Despite this, Morawiecki of Kaczyński continues to carry on in this cesspool. Yes, they are personally liable for expanding energy prices." Stelmach adds that "Germany promotes the paradigm of sustainable improvement and the 4th Industrial Revolution due to the fact that they want to hold the position of planet leader in innovation and production".
Moreover, the Green Deal will make fossil fuel energy very costly or will not be at all. In return, countries of our part of the region are to buy costly RES technologies (photovoltaics, heat pumps) from Germany and another Western European countries. According to Stelmach, decarbonisation is intended to "maintain the economical advantage of countries that grew up as powers after planet War II and developed fresh technologies for renewable energy sources (RES), sequestration and retention of carbon dioxide underground, widely understood geoengineering (influence on weather), artificial meat production, next generation vaccines, etc." Meanwhile, RES have small to do with clean energy generation: “The most harmful substances emitted by the photovoltaic manufacture include fluorine compounds, respective twelve times more active than carbon dioxide. (...) A popular method of disposal of panels is burning during which toxic elements can enter the atmosphere or groundwater."
ESG standards
The European Union implements sustainable improvement into its legal system, including under the pseudonym of the Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance. The most crucial EU government in this area is Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, commonly referred to as the EU Taxonomy and Directive (EU) reporting of companies on sustainable improvement 20222/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council. As pointed out on its website, the Polish Agency for Enterprise improvement refers to investments to be balanced and to supply a crucial contribution to the accomplishment of at least 1 of the six environmental objectives. In turn, the Directive concerns mandatory reporting, which must contain information from 3 areas: environmental, environmental, including climate, social, and human-related impacts, i.e. workers, contractors, customers, local community, etc., and corporate governance. All of this detailed reporting will be subject to mandatory audit by designated certification entities and to the authoritative reporting database. Failure to comply with this regulation will consequence in financial penalties.
It is clear that ESG standards must artificially make additional costs and lead to a shift distant from optimal resource allocation. due to the fact that if the ESG standards had made resource allocation and cheaper production more efficient, they would have long been introduced without this full doctrine of sustainable development. Nothing like that happened. Thus, from the point of view of social engineers, coercion became necessary. The effect will be that the company implementing ESG standards will become little competitive due to the fact that it will not act in a way that provides as much profit as possible, and that is the nonsubjective of any business. Just as the precedence of companies is not to give jobs to trade unions or to pay taxes (greatly without it), it is not to save the planet or reduce poorness and carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere. The other is gibberish. According to the PwC ESG study — Damocles' sword or the chance of a strategical change of ESG issues influence the valuation of companies on the Polish market. Almost 30 percent of respondents are able to reduce the valuation or quit investment in situations where the risks of ESG are besides advanced (Pb.pl). In another words, ESG standards are also EU harmful regulation put on the back of companies who are struggling with an ever-increasing amount of nonsense from companies operating in the European Union.
This can actually only work in 1 situation – in case of methodical and pushy propaganda, which will make water from people's brains. She will say that for the sake of humanity they must buy more costly and inferior products produced by companies that respect ESG. As before, for the profits of any companies, the wisemen promoted the alleged fair trade. The thoughtless and unreflective majority will fall for it. Just as it has already been said to the public that to save the planet, you should quit comfortable combustion cars for uncomfortable and costly electrical vehicles, airplane flights, inexpensive energy and buying costly food. You can see that propaganda does miracles.
As part of the sustainable improvement carried out by the European Green Governance, the European Union has launched its actions not only against companies but besides against agriculture and so all consumers. Brussels wants to increase the amount of land allocated to organic farming by 25 percent, and organic farming is much little spent. The Union besides intends to reduce the livestock population. Both of these activities represent a extremist increase in food prices.
Disasterous Results
Some of these actions that hinder people's lives are already felt, and this is only the beginning: bans on entering cities, the elimination of parking lots, flight bans for short distances, bans on eating meat and dairy products, restrictions on purchasing clothes, forced electromobility, mandatory thermomodernisation of buildings, forced RES, bans on solid fuel boilers. All these regulations are unbelievable restrictions on our freedom, which would have been unthinkable in the 1990s. Secondly, this policy (e.g. the full ETS, i.e. the taxation of carbon dioxide) increases the cost of living. It is due to it that fuel and electricity prices are rising sharply, resulting in an increase in prices not only for transport and heating, but for all goods and services. "The rising cost of surviving will gotta continue. Inflation will be driven not only by regional wars and conflicts, but above all by a large share of climate-related investment financing and to “repair” the financial system. The costs of transformation are already being passed on to citizens," writes Stelmach. Moreover, in order to accomplish the climate objectives, the European Commission besides proposes introducing minimum (read: high) taxation rates for heating and transport, which will further increase their prices. In 2022, the Council of the European Union reached agreement on the improvement of the ETS and the package. Fit for 55 on GHG simplification from agriculture, buildings and waste: "They are besides to be included in the emissions licence trading scheme, putting citizens at hazard of a steady increase in billing costs and advanced price volatility".
Stelmach notes that since all of this coercion and sharp price increases may not appeal to the vast majority of society, social engineers are already preparing for a general revolt against these striking rules: “As part of sustainable improvement solutions, “resistent cities” are besides proposed for social rebellions that “don’t spill outside”, i.e. they are compact in scope. The essence is compaction, limiting single-family buildings, creating cities called short distances (cycle paths, electrical cars and public transport at most). A smaller area of housing, smaller distances between buildings, cultural diversity (confusion of vicinity residents), social and cooperative construction, integration schools (presumed to be about building social cohesion) are besides elements of sustainable urban policy."
All of these activities are possible only due to the fact that civilization with the usage of the free marketplace has achieved specified a level of prosperity that a large part of society can deal with unnecessary and unproductive and even economically harmful jobs. Above all, it is officials who not only implement detailed urban planning, unnecessary "investment" and increasingly common surveillance. They are besides politicians who implement specified absurdities as the artificial "market" of emissions trading and the ESG. The monitoring, reporting, inventory of emissions is very crucial for them, which means that companies are one more time burdened with additional obligations and processed by bureaucratic systems. Something no 1 should be worried about. In this way, not only human resources are being wasted, but besides the further growth of society's welfare. To make this even more meaningful, and unfortunately their results will be disastrous.
Tomasz Piepienik
Discover a unique publication. "Sustainable development. The spell of globalists, an instrument of full enslavement” [PODCAST]
Luke Warzecha: “Sustainable Development” to deprive us of ownership
Pope, woman de Rothschild and “inclusive capitalism”
Arkadiusz Stelmach: Communism branded its death and painted green
