Clarke's household is on the move. A while ago, Mrs. Dominic Clarke, a parent of five-year-olds from Podkarpacia, published an emotional entry online in which she admitted to feeling affected by a wave of hatred and fears that social services could take her children away. "I inactive gotta wait for the children to be taken, put into a strategy of better care than a simple, happy household home. Dear viewers, this is the end, I have no strength to fight a planet that has lost human feelings" - she wrote in an instagram post. This is not the end, however, due to the fact that the household substance was to be curious in even the Child's Spokeswoman, the police, and now besides Dorota Zawadzka, known online as "Supernia".
RECLAMA
See Socha's video after 21 years she returned to Thailand. Was there any tummy turbulence?
"Supernia" wants to establish the facts. "Don't compose that it's no of my business"
The fresh events in the life of the Clarke household have sparked a stir among their observers. Dorota Zawadzka, known online as "Supernia", besides decided to join the case.
"He seeks contact with Clarke's family. I wrote the priv messages, but I don't have an answer. I'd like to ask this mom a fewer questions to establish the facts and give her a chance to answer crucial questions about children. Their treatment, rehabilitation and surviving conditions. Absolutely not to harm her, but to ask at her source. And don't tell me it's no of our business. We've looked for different parents here who exploit the image of children or violent ones. And it's always our case" - we read in the appeal she made. "No hate, please. Just a substance of fact and substance. I besides want to see any psychologists who'll watch hundreds of movies with me. Children, especially premature babies, require peculiar care" - he added.
It turns out that Dominic Clarke has already responded to Dorota Zawadzki's appeal. A very meaningful post appeared on the FB profile. "If anyone truly wants to help, they can compose to me privately. I compose off messages - frequently even at night erstwhile I can't sleep. You don't gotta look for me on the net or compose posts about my family" - writes Mrs. Dominic.
Ombudsman for the Rights of the kid and police intervention
Dominic Clarke is happy to share five-year stories online. Thousands of net users follow the destiny of the household on Facebook, Instagram and TikToku. It is through social media and the emotional entries of Mrs Dominika that we learn that she must face hatred and many accusations of kid neglect.
The parent of the five-year-olds besides informed net users that she had received a message from the Ombudsman of Children's Rights. "I take the phone... and abruptly the screen darkens, and on it comes the words that frost my blood. I'm shaking my finger clicking on the message. email from the institution. kid Rights Advocate. Encrypted, cold, alien. You gotta call the password - but only since morning, from 8:15 Polish time. It's 2:00 in the morning here. Eleven hours of emptiness ahead of me" - writes Mrs. Dominic in a post on the FB.
What was in the writing? This was written by the author herself. "The case that caused so much emotion solved itself. Turns out it's just a message about 'the dangers of the Internet' - sent in connection with many reports of alleged negligence in our family. I don't regret it. I think that all office should respond to reports - and this is good" - informs Dominika Clarke.
However, this is not the end, due to the fact that on Clark's authoritative Facebook profile there was another entry by Mrs. Dominica, informing that the police had entered their home. "We crossed a fresh level of absurdity yesterday: 4 police officers in my house. Yeah, four, due to the fact that in Mrs. N.'s imagination, our everyday life is not a family, it's a crime scene. Searched rooms, photos, movies - all to find proof that 'there's definitely something wrong'. What? And nothing," we read.
Clark's household case concerns net users
We have an anonymous letter from a female who herself is the parent of 4 children and, as she admits, she cannot imagine showing everything online, as Mrs. Dominic does. "I believe that showing children on the Internet, telling about problems of each of them, telling about financial problems before the full world, is foolish. Kids will gotta put up with hatred by the end of school! Like their parent now" - writes the author of the letter. "I realize that this is their way of earning, but at the expense of children?! Their parent is emotionally unstable, broken, tired and most likely unhappy. It's awful! (...) This does not look normal, even pathologically" - we read further.
Similar comments are besides not missing from the network. 1 thing is certain: Clark's household case is burning the net to red.
Do you think that publishing children's image online and sharing private moments in household life should be limited by law in any way? Or is it the opposite? What is your opinion on this subject? I look forward to your thoughts and comments: [email protected]. I warrant anonymity!
