President of the Confederate associate Grzegorz Płaczek
I will effort to be as precise as possible to describe the current situation, which is unprecedented and shows how Poland was incorporated into the ReArm Europe mechanism, at the approval of the Polish government.
Here is the series of events – step by step:
In March 2025, Ms Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, presented the ReArm Europe mechanism, which envisages spending up to EUR 800 billion for investment in the EU defence sector by 2030. The ReArm Europe mechanics is simply a strategical European Union initiative to strengthen the defence capacity of the Union and the associate States.
The ReArmEurope consists of 3 main backing pillars – 1 of which is the SAFE debt facility worth up to EUR 150 billion! This instrument can be utilized by EU associate States (borrowing loans) and indebted for up to 45 years by buying arms (together with another EU countries).
In the SAFE mechanism, it is crucial that you can borrow money, but besides that you can do it – selling military equipment produced in a given country to another EU countries.
The public was informed that Poland would, of course, make money on this mechanics and that Poland would buy military equipment from another countries. And there's something to fight for – it's about almost 150 billion Euros. Are... are you sure?
I decided to dig into the details of the SAFE mechanism. A detailed analysis of the mechanics shows that Brussels has included in its assumptions a ‘curious’ provision that SAFE will be able to buy equipment ONLY from those companies/EU countries which:
– sale only products from EU and Ukrainian companies,
– will prove that 65% of production components (!) come from the European Union or Ukraine.
And this is where it gets interesting...
It seems that no 1 knows precisely how many arms companies there are in Poland, and what precisely will Poland be able to sale to another countries? We know that we can surely (under SAFE) indebted and bought from others, but do... sale too? It remains a mystery of the polyquinel. Many military experts point out that, certainly, companies that can sale to others, and yet make money from the SAFE mechanism, are... companies from Germany, France and Ukraine. If this were the case, it means that Brussels is clearly playing for another countries, with the silent acceptance of Warsaw and Poland will not be added to the giant bag of money.
Consequently:
– I send an urgent parliamentary interpellation to get information from the head of the MON, Mr Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz, how many strategical arms companies in Poland (and specifically what?) produces "products" present utilizing at least 65% of the components from the EU and Ukraine region?
– I am sending urgent parliamentary intervention to the Polish Armed Forces Group to get information on how many strategical defence companies, which are part of the PGZ, in Poland (and specifically what?) produces products present utilizing at least 65% of components from the EU and Ukraine region?
The questions are strategical – if we find that we do not have "products" in Poland that meet the request of 65% (or we have only a fewer of them), we will be left out in the fight for giant money and we will be under the SAFE mechanism, as a country, only spending, not earning. And this would confirm that Brussels plays long-term, erstwhile again, only on selected players. And among them there is no Poland, which is said to be – as the honourable Prime Minister Donald Tusk says – no 1 in the European Union will win...
Entry Step by step, how the Union played Tusk on defence... pochodzi z serwisu Confederation.
