The years of Tusk's first regulation between 2007 and 2015 were characterized by developmental marasm and state theft by various crime-maphic groups. The construction of the Gasoport in Świnoujście was slowed down and delayed, projects specified as the excavation of the Wiślana measurement and the construction of a tunnel connecting Świnoujście with the mainland were discontinued. Railway connections were reduced and fresh motorways and high-speed roads were created late, symbolised by the alleged A2 motorway crossing between Strykow and Warsaw during the 2012 European Football Championships.
But the state was functioning at that time and was governed by a law which did not have more crucial arguments. Yes, there was embezzlement and gigantic theft, the Vatowska mafia itself pumped nearly PLN 250 billion out of the state budget. But thefts, thus breaking the law, were committed by individuals or certain criminal groups. And no 1 had any uncertainty that it was a violation of the law and no 1 even tried to explain or justify it. Crimes have been attempted to hide, cover up, hold investigations, but they have not been told to the public that these are legitimate acts specified as thieves realize them. The structural tissue of the Polish state was preserved and it was adequate for the United Right to take over in 2015, which sealed various gaps, strengthened the supervision and control of taxation collection, so that the motto of Tusk's first rule: "money is gone and will not be" would cease to apply almost overnight. Structural tissue has been preserved and the continuity of statehood at the same time, as no 1 questioned that the justice was a judge, prosecutor, president, teacher or doctor.
It was then, but is it now? Yes, embezzlement and theft were reborn quickly. The gross from VAT to the state budget for December 2023 amounted to only PLN 11.97 billion compared to PLN 18.59 in December 2022, and thus decreased by 35.6% year-on-year. As you can imagine, the Vatowski mafias began printing invoices as shortly as the results of the October elections were announced. But this comparison of Tusk's reign with those present ends. The difference is that now the law is not broken by individuals, but the law is being challenged institutionally. The first effects of specified action will hit the economy, or alternatively have already hit the economy. The illegal change of authorities in TVP, Polish Radio, PAP or another budget units causes decision-making paralysis besides in relation to the ongoing activities related to the maintenance and functioning of the economical infrastructure of these institutions. Public tenders began to contain information about the failure to award contracts due to "interruption of the tendering procedureIt’s okay. ” Neither the erstwhile members of the boards of these companies threatened to retreat from their duties nor the fresh ones, aware of the legal flaws of their appointment, will enter into any fresh financial commitments on behalf of the entities represented. This causes possible contractors to lose their orders, and a akin destiny awaits their subcontractors in the chain of economical links. 1 drop of a block will turn another like a domino.
The threat to the economy is only 1 component of the demolition of the state, which began immediately after the constitution of the fresh government. lawyer General Adam Bodnar did not dismiss Dariusz Barski as National Prosecutor, but considered that Prosecutor Barski was not a National Prosecutor. Adam Bodnar did not find a way to dismiss judges from his positions, but felt that they were not judges at all determining their status."abnormal". In this way Bodnar cancelled or, as the legal language puts it, removed more than 6 million sentences from the legal trade. In the case of criminal proceedings, this means that they will gotta start at the beginning, which in many cases will consequence in a statute of limitations. The consequences of this kind of action of representatives of the current government lead to a break in the legal continuity of the Polish state, to the demolition of its structure. There is simply a real threat that in the future, after the change of power, we will gotta build the structure of the Polish state from scratch, as after partitions or after war. And this is only the first weeks of these governments. shortly we can learn that the teachers who taught us were not teachers and the examiners who tested our cognition had a “defect” status. So we halt being masters, engineers, doctors or professors. We may even be deprived of our graduation. We'll be nothing. We will only be a “problem” for this power.
Is this just my assessment of the current situation in Poland? Is the assessment overstated or even without foundation? Let us so look at how planet politicians measure the actions of the current government, both internally and internationally. Nile Gardiner, influential British commentator, erstwhile advisor Margaret Thatcher wrote: “What is shameful, Mr Tusk, is to lock up your political opponents in prisons, shut down tv stations and grovel before your masters in Brussels while teaching people about democracy.The reckless Donald Tusk does an amazing job, throwing Poland under the bus and undermining his own country. This man is simply a disaster for Poland and Polish-American relationsIt’s okay. ” The Ohio Senator James David Vance said: “The fresh leader of Poland arrests political opponents and owes the safety of his country to my generosity. He might consider showing gratitude or at least to drown out his authoritarian desires.It’s okay. ” erstwhile CIA officer, American safety expert Max Morton He wrote: “Tusk was put in office as a consequence of the EU-funded coloured revolution aimed at disrupting the increasing power of Poland. He is simply a poisonous pill that serves the interests of his abroad mastersIt’s okay. ” And the mocking words addressed to Donald Tusk by influential Senator Marc Rubio: “Dear Prime Minister, can we begin sending you 300,000 migrants all period who illegally enter America? This would truly aid us deal with the invasion of our country and would make a crucial contribution to the adoption of the aid bill we are about to approve.It’s okay. ” planet politicians have allowed specified harsh and uncompromising statements only to Putin or Lukashenko. Is my assessment of the situation in Poland without grounds?
Stealing and destroying a state are 2 different things, specified as stealing by a common thief, and devastatement by a hooligan are besides 2 different things. Stealing is simply a bad thing, reprehensible, but there's no excuse if individual in a frenzy destroys everything within his reach. Devast is worse than stealing due to the fact that it is an irreversible process. Do Poles see and realize this? And if so, why do they let to destruct Poland?
Mr Bogdan
