Wonder what he'll see and see what function he's in. Will he see that he has entered a function where there is no good way out.
Anyone can be president. That's what they say. At least in the democratic system. Recently, Wojciech Fibak (former tennis player, in case anyone forgets) told TOK FM Radio that a private worker of McDonald’s could become president in the US. So that's why Donald Trump served fries to customers of this network? You got to be kidding me. It's called macdonaldization of politics and media. I ask Fibak to point out from the last 2 centuries an American politician who did not come from the elite. Trump? Let's not be ridiculous. But anyone and possibly (in theory) can become president: actor, lover of politics, and even journalist. possibly Stanowski. But there's another side to this medal.
If you enter politics, you become a politician. And your spells that you're not are false and will not change that fact. Yesterday you were a journalist, present you are a politician and the way back is gone due to the fact that it's a one-way trip. Thomas Lis, who withdrew from the launch at the last minute, knew this. This is clear from codes of journalistic ethics – whether Polish or American. For example, Article 21 of the Code of Ethics of the Association of Polish Journalists states that "it is essential to exclude specified activities and to execute functions in public administration and in political organizations". Although ironically, SDP activists themselves became politicians and were blind to ethical directives. present the directors of this organization call it independent (ha, ha! – forgive me, but I can't halt laughing), not seeing its politicization or even "writing". But let's get back to the point.
You're either a writer or a politician. You cannot be both a writer and a politician, due to the fact that it is not possible to be at the same time and in 1 individual a prosecutor and defender, accuser and accused, you cannot control the power you represent in another role. That's all Stanowski should know, and he certain knows, but why play it for him? I'm not going to speculate besides much, but if individual is organizing a Zero Channel congress, then possibly to make a backdrop for their candidacy composed of their fans, and possibly they're reasoning of turning KZ into a political organization (?) It would most likely be the first media political organization in Poland! Anyway, the business is going around, the Channel is talking and writing, and it doesn't substance whether it's good or bad, due to the fact that the counter is beating, and the money's moving in a fast stream. But what does that gotta do with journalism? That's pure comedy!
Stanowski's expected to be making a keg of elections, and he's truly doing business, building coverage and mocking journalistic ethics. However, I am amazed by the reaction of many journalists to his appearances. any people may envy him, others will take a fancy to his bravado, and there are those who claim to be criticizing him and, in fact, stress that his start in the election will revive the campaign. Really, have we forgotten so much as an environment with ethical standards that everything is allowed today? Stanowski late spoke on the channel with a South African murderer. So it seems he can do anything for publicity. And sacrifice to be president of the brightest Republic!
