Stanisław Michalkiewicz: Sharing skin on a surviving bear
On the feast of the 3 Kings there was a “higher” “coal of willing” in Paris, attended by the president of Ukraine and representatives of the United States. The intent of this gathering was to present the guarantees that “the coalition of willing” intends to grant Ukraine so that president Zelenski does not worry that peace will be so terrible. It is worth noting that talks to date are held among Ukrainian allies – and yet they seem difficult. Otherwise, how could we realize the messages that there has been a “closer position” and so on?
If the Ukrainian president were negotiating with the president of the Russian Federation, specified messages would be more understandable, as diplomatic language is not so much utilized to express thought as to hide them. For example, if the communication says that the talks were conducted in an atmosphere of common understanding, then in translation into the human language means that the parties in any case did not scope agreement – and so on. So the results of the gathering of the “voluntary coalition” with the Ukrainian president besides look “promising” and “more and more specifically”.
With respect to these “concretes”, the United Kingdom”, which has signed a “hundred-year partnership” with Ukraine and France, expressed their willingness to send their troops to oversee the ceasefire after the war.
What does that mean? The fact that president Żeleński seemingly had to admit that “a ceasefire” or alternatively “a frost of conflict” would affect the failure of at least 20 or even 25 percent of the state territory by Ukraine. During his gathering with president Trump in Florida, president Zelenski had already acknowledged the request to reconcile with territorial losses, but he stressed that a referendum on this issue had to be held in Ukraine.
It is not hard to know what the results of specified a referendum, organised by force, under the supervision of the SBU, would be – so it is impossible to treat this condition differently, like trying to postpone what is inevitable.
The point is that the president of Zelenski besides burns the earth under his feet, especially after the corruption scandal, which included his closest collaborators; Timura Mindycz, who hugged at least $100 million and fled to Israel and Andrzej Jermak, not only about how much he hugged himself, but besides – and possibly first of all – whether he did so for his cognition or even worse – with president Zelenski's participation or “without his cognition and consent” – in order to usage a expression in this case, too, which shows its usefulness not only in mirroring moral authorities.
The complicated situation at the summits of Ukrainian power is besides pointed out by president Zelenski throwing overboard Ukrainian government pirogs for the eating of crocodiles, subsequent Negro peasants and replacing them with others, which is more digestible for both president Zelenski and the Oligarchs there. We cannot lose sight of what kind of country Ukraine is – that it is an oligarchy of oligarchs.
It differs from the Russian Federation by the fact that there are oligarchs in Russia, but there, it is the president who decides who can be oligarch, while in Ukraine, oligarchs decide who can be president. A large example of this mechanics is president Zelenski himself, an invention of the judaic oligarch of Igor Kolomojski, who not only launched it, but financed it with an election campaign.
Returning to the Paris Summit, it has all the marks of sharing the skin on the bear – because, as I mentioned, “difficult” negotiations are being held among Ukrainian allies, without the engagement of Russia, who will have something to say about how to end the conflict, or at least the conditions of its “freezing”.
For example, since 1 of the conditions that Russia does not intend to depart from is to block Ukraine's participation in NATO, it is hard to imagine Russia agreeing to oversee the truce in Ukraine by NATO troops, which would thus inevitably approach the borders of the Russian Federation as if Ukraine had been admitted to NATO. In this situation, the Parisese “guarantees” from “the willing coalition” must be considered an effort to block the end of the war in Ukraine – regardless of what president Donald Trump's real intentions are in this matter.
The last American action in Venezuela, although it has sparked critical comments in Russia and China – but independent of this, both leaders can hide their hands with joy. The American operation in Venezuela shows that president Trump has taken Monroe's doctrine literally, and this in turn makes the political strategy created after planet War II go back into the past.
In turn, before our eyes, there is simply a fresh political system, provided for by Jerzy Orwell in the professional book “The Year 1984”, where we read about the permanent war between the 3 powers: Eurasia, Oceania and East Asia. Against this background, the present situation of the United Nations seems peculiarly grotesque. It becomes a caberet scene – due to the fact that how else do you treat the declaration of the American ambassador to the United Nations that the U.S. does not carry out any “war” with Venezuela or “buy” it, and the capture of Nicholas Maduro was an act of “enforcement”?
In this situation, America will be harder to moralize Russia due to the war in Ukraine, due to the fact that Russia has maintained from the very beginning that it does not lead any “war” only “special military operation”. Apparently, there are times erstwhile what was an anecdote becomes a political reality. I mean, of course, the anecdetic answer. Radio Erevan to ask the afraid listener if there would be a war. Of course, there will be no war – said Radio Erewan – for this it will make specified a fight for peace that there will not even be a stone left on the stone.
Thus, even president Trump's announcement that the US will now “rule” Venezuela and through powerful American corporations will put their hand on the resources there, which would have been previously called “occupation”, is present called preparation for a “fair transformation”. It is not yet known whether the face of this “fair transformation” will be “hardhead tiger”, Delcy Rodriguez, or Nobel Peace Prize winner Maria Machado.
For if the American commandos had put it on the stool of the president of Venezuela, it would be an infallible sign that democracy prevailed there. In specified a situation, however, it would be hard to cultivate moralism even to Alexander Lukashenko, so it is no wonder that president Putin may have reasons to be satisfied. Citizen Tusk Donald is besides happy, who has been told that Poland will be a “leading state”, that is, – she will fur Ukraine for free, as so far. And that's the most crucial thing.
We besides recommend: California endures restrictions on the sexualisation of children in school libraries
