Stanisław Michalkiewicz: Case or necessity?
The title of the column refers to the book by James Monod, a French biologist, a Nobel Prize laureate, who in the book entitled “The Case and the Necessity” proves that in fact the boundaries between what we call a case and what we call a necessity are not impermeable at all – from which the author drew far-reaching conclusions – that discipline requires the rejection of all doctrines, especially spiritual doctrines, and that man is alone in the Universe in which he appeared due to the accident.
Although it is believed in the general reception that Monod rejects only, or above all, religion, but not only it, due to the fact that it clearly emphasizes the request to reject ALL doctrines, and thus besides socialism, besides this one, boldly called “scientific”. possibly Marx and his microcephal of the epigons did not announcement that the noun: “socialism” bearing the adjective “scientific” is cotradictio in adiceto, a contradiction in itself, due to the fact that socialism by definition “scientific” cannot be and is an inability to be primal and objective.
I found this during my studies, erstwhile we had the political economy of capitalism in the first year, and the political economy of socialism in the second year. While the erstwhile was logical; 1 was based on the other, the second seemed to be a chaotic cadaver in which capturing even the appearance of regularity and logic was inconspicuous.
Unfortunately, there were many hoochsztaplers who doctored and habilitated from this socialist economy, as well as from democratic centralism, so as the appearances of education spread, which is the merit of higher gas cooking schools like Collegium Tumanum, most graduates have no thought about it, while the remainder complete democracy, according to which – especially erstwhile dealing with full democracy – about what is actual and what is not – is decided by Most, according to the rule that the greater Number, the more rightly Right.
But adequate of these digressions, due to the fact that Monod was just a pretext, and it truly is about the events that followed Donald Trump's triumph in the American presidential election on November 5th. It happened that immediately after Donald Trump's clear triumph was officially confirmed, on 6 November German Chancellor Olaf Scholz resigned the Minister of Finance in his government Christian Lindner.
It was, among another things, about respective twelve billion euros that the German government first allocated to combating the criminal coronavirus, but erstwhile Putin liquidated this epidemic overnight, he figured out that he would spend that money on another jesters, that is, combating climate and energy blowing winds. In the meantime, specified transfers were prohibited by an independent tribunal, whose judgments in actual Germany are respected, while in our bantistan, which is in the process of being adapted to the General Guberni, the vaginet of a citizen Tusk Donald ostentatically disregards them.
I mean – not German, but God forbid; just the thought of ignoring the judgments of the German Court, citizen Tusk Donald would surely stain the uniform of the Prime Minister – only the Polish Court, which Judenrat “Gazeta Wyborcza” with a Jewish-specific sense of superiority towards stupid goys, called until late “the criterion of Julia Przyłębska”. Returning to Minister Christian Lindner, he even began to question the assumptions of the government's economical policy, which yet led to his resignation and the dissolution of the coalition of 3 parties: the SPD, the FDP and the Greens.
As a result, just a period after Donald Trump was sworn in as the American President, the accelerated elections will take place in Germany on 23 February. The result of these elections may be a substance of chance, but there may besides be an component of necessity – if, of course, the Central Agency Intelligence would like to influence their results. If there were accusations in 2016 that even in the US presidential election the cold Russian checker Putin interfered, why couldn't the CIA interfere in the German parliamentary elections?
After all, we remember how during Donald Trump's first presidency, the freshly baked French president Emmanuel Macron argued that 1 of the essential reasons for establishing a European armed force independent of NATO is the necessity of “defence of Europe” against the United States, among others. In response, president Trump noted that America had never invaded Europe and maliciously added that if it had not been for the US, the French would have studied in Paris in German.
For this the French Prime Minister advised president Trump not to stick his nose in any of his business. For specified a dictum after 3 days France paralyzed the movement of the “yellow vests” which the French authorities tried to master with top difficulty for many months. Of course, the CIA didn't admit she was involved, but if she confessed, would anyone be surprised?
I am besides mentioning this due to the fact that it was in the last days in France that the government fell down, with specified difficulty being so complicated after the elections ordered by president Macron immediately after it turned out that elections to the European Parliament were won by the National Assembly of Mary Le Pen in France. The first circular of these elections was won by the National Unity, but the second – Fołksfront, or People's Front – but he did not gain the absolute majority.
And now this shaky government has collapsed as a consequence of a motion for a vote of distrust, tabled by Fołksfront, with the support of the National Unity. What will president Macron do in this situation? Will the government be grumbling on its own, or will – like Germany – wait until Donald Trump is sworn in in America?
Of course, these government solstices in Germany and France may be entirely random, but they may besides form part of the preparation of the European Union, in which Germany and France play a “conductive function in the construction of socialism”, to the fresh American approach announced by Donald Trump.
What about our unfortunate bantustan? Although we note the signs of a increasing class conflict as national socialism develops – but in a government coalition, a vaginet-owned citizen of Tusk Donald, it was powerful. After all, only to watch Poland again pass under the German curate under the American curate, which may affect the request to make a substitution as the leader of the political scene of our bantastan.
Such a control could happen even without the participation of waiters – as was the case in 2014-2015 – only following the reversal of political alliances by the 3rd Way. Would the discreet inspiration of the Central Intelligence Agency velocity up the essential decisions to make government solstice in Poland, for example, in February, for respective months by presidential elections? If this were to be considered essential in Washington, it could happen accidentally.
We besides recommend: The utmost left puts in place a ranking of schools in Poland in terms of approach to deviants
