"There are ideas that are highly dangerous to citizens' rights. Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki announced the introduction of legal solutions that would let the usage of the Polish Army within the country without introducing any exceptional states. The opposition warns that this is simply a very dangerous solution and that the Law and Justice Government is utilizing a hard situation to actually gain another tool for utilizing force – I am certain that specified comments could be read if, let us give it to the Law and Justice Government in 2022. But now the government is smiling, so erstwhile Prime Minister Donald Tusk announces specified regulations, the raban cannot be heard. It's a shame, due to the fact that it's a very dangerous direction. The more dangerous it is if we combine it with the way the current power acts in matters concerning our privacy and the powers of the state towards citizens. There is no "cleaning up after the Law and Justice" here, which should consist in the re-limiting of the highly broad powers that specified services have received in the period 2015-2023, specified as the State Protection Service or the Customs and taxation Service. There is besides no thought how to tighten up a completely fictional strategy of judicial oversight over operational control and downloading information about connections available to the service on 1 click. There are also ideas that are highly dangerous to citizens. 1 of them is simply a ‘indiscriminate search’ to be recorded in the service's operational work code (the ‘Rz’). The right of the service to enter the apartment, to search it in the absence of witnesses, including the household, and to safe the evidence is more frequently recalled in the context of erstwhile governments of Belarus than the country of western democracy. It doesn't take an exceptional imagination to realize how gigantic the anticipation of abuse would be. Dropping the evidence would be child's play. Unless individual believes that the “smiled” power is and will always be crystal honest. However, I would urge a far-reaching mistrust towards all the ruling.”
A Wednesday media review; Not one, but 2 Su-57? Provocation by Belarus
"There are ideas that are highly dangerous to citizens' rights. Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki announced the introduction of legal solutions that would let the usage of the Polish Army within the country without introducing any exceptional states. The opposition warns that this is simply a very dangerous solution and that the Law and Justice Government is utilizing a hard situation to actually gain another tool for utilizing force – I am certain that specified comments could be read if, let us give it to the Law and Justice Government in 2022. But now the government is smiling, so erstwhile Prime Minister Donald Tusk announces specified regulations, the raban cannot be heard. It's a shame, due to the fact that it's a very dangerous direction. The more dangerous it is if we combine it with the way the current power acts in matters concerning our privacy and the powers of the state towards citizens. There is no "cleaning up after the Law and Justice" here, which should consist in the re-limiting of the highly broad powers that specified services have received in the period 2015-2023, specified as the State Protection Service or the Customs and taxation Service. There is besides no thought how to tighten up a completely fictional strategy of judicial oversight over operational control and downloading information about connections available to the service on 1 click. There are also ideas that are highly dangerous to citizens. 1 of them is simply a ‘indiscriminate search’ to be recorded in the service's operational work code (the ‘Rz’). The right of the service to enter the apartment, to search it in the absence of witnesses, including the household, and to safe the evidence is more frequently recalled in the context of erstwhile governments of Belarus than the country of western democracy. It doesn't take an exceptional imagination to realize how gigantic the anticipation of abuse would be. Dropping the evidence would be child's play. Unless individual believes that the “smiled” power is and will always be crystal honest. However, I would urge a far-reaching mistrust towards all the ruling.”