“Services will usage guns against the rules, but they will not be punished. Associations with projects specified as " impunity plus" are most appropriate. The Ministry of National Defence published a draft of amendments to the government “to improve the activities of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Poland, the Police and the Border defender in the event of a threat to State security” (No UD73 of 17 June 2024). The draft provides, inter alia, for the addition of a fresh ‘border countertype’ to the criminal code (Article 253). He is to prejudge that “no soldier, police officer or Border defender commits a crime that violates the rules” gives, for example, an order to open fire or to fire at people himself. The proposed Article 253 k.k. violates the constitutional rule of legalism. Public authorities, including police officers or soldiers, are to act on the basis and within the limits of the law. Meanwhile, the proposed provision prejudges that the services will usage their weapons against the rules, but they will not be punished. Associations with ideas of “ impunity plus” in connection with envelope choices or purchases of respirators during the pandemic are most appropriate. The rule is identical: power breaks the law and then produces provisions that exclude criminal liability for abuse of powers. This has nothing to do with the rules of the democratic state."
Wednesday media review; Nearly 4 billion for the anti-air defence of Poland; North Korea. She tested hypersonic weapons without success
“Services will usage guns against the rules, but they will not be punished. Associations with projects specified as " impunity plus" are most appropriate. The Ministry of National Defence published a draft of amendments to the government “to improve the activities of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Poland, the Police and the Border defender in the event of a threat to State security” (No UD73 of 17 June 2024). The draft provides, inter alia, for the addition of a fresh ‘border countertype’ to the criminal code (Article 253). He is to prejudge that “no soldier, police officer or Border defender commits a crime that violates the rules” gives, for example, an order to open fire or to fire at people himself. The proposed Article 253 k.k. violates the constitutional rule of legalism. Public authorities, including police officers or soldiers, are to act on the basis and within the limits of the law. Meanwhile, the proposed provision prejudges that the services will usage their weapons against the rules, but they will not be punished. Associations with ideas of “ impunity plus” in connection with envelope choices or purchases of respirators during the pandemic are most appropriate. The rule is identical: power breaks the law and then produces provisions that exclude criminal liability for abuse of powers. This has nothing to do with the rules of the democratic state."