It makes no sense to want or others this year to be better than the erstwhile year, as it will be a manifestation of the idle spell of reality, There is besides no point in assuming that it will be worse, even if it seems to indicate the natural trajectory of current events.
It is worth wishing, however, that things should become more clear, for good and for bad, i.e. that more masks should fall and more hidden ideas emerge, which will let for more and more prudent attitudes and better serving actual with a large P.
So it is worth wishing for what will be done in our favour only if we make a commitment to it proportionate to the expected benefit. Then neither will it be essential to passively anticipate the favour of external accidents, nor, having made a fair effort, will it be susceptible to a possible deficiency of akin favor. In another words, it is only then that the reasonable nature is well disposed to accept the expected grace.
* * Oh, * *
The anticipation of a fair dispute ends not where 1 proclaims the primacy of fact and another opinion, 1 primacy of principle, and the another circumstance, whether 1 primacy of work and another desire, but where any claim that there is no sharp difference between 1 and the other. Then it is known that 1 is involved, not in a dispute, but in fraud, so 1 should not discuss, but give warnings.
* * Oh, * *
It is simply a mistake to search out any apparent or hidden meaning in the accumulation of today's violently suicidal and misanthropic ideologies. At the same time, it is besides incorrect to believe that their current collapse is in the final account the consequence of an unfortunate interplay of circumstances. In fact, it is that the self-destructive and humiliating nonsense of all these ideologies is intended to service to whom the sinking of the planet into absurdity is an end in itself.
In another words, on the 1 hand, it is not worth wasting time to think about the mark form of the celebrated “new planet order” due to the fact that there is no method in which absurdities accumulate. Only then, on the 1 hand, will the chance of the enemy not be overestimated, and on the another hand, his destructive determination will not be ignored, combining unwavering vigilance with deep interior peace.
* * Oh, * *
Whoever says "yes" is "yes" and "no" is "no," he serves the truth. Whoever says "yes" is "no" and "no" is "yes" is simply a lie. However, who says that ‘yes’ is sometimes ‘yes’ and sometimes ‘no’ is serving a gibberish, or lie to a lying person, that he is even afraid to mention his name. Hence, the erstwhile has the chance to never get out of the way, the second has the chance even at the last minute to return to it, while the second threatens to bring himself and others to the end of the road, which he will not be able to place.
* * Oh, * *
If 1 proclaims openly and unambiguously, among another things, that Christians and Marxists should "dialog with 1 another in order to make a common social ethics"—i.e. if 1 proclaims openly and unequivocally the request for the synthesis of God's gospel and diabolical ideology—this has nothing to do with the Church founded by Christ, but that he tries to destruct it in a calculated manner through consistent sowing of confusion and mischief combined with the preservation of image appearances.
On the another hand, endless attempts to practice logical equilibrisms that effort to translate akin statements with “communicational errors”, “unfortunate ignorance”, “pastoral inadvisability” or “extravagant diplomacy” unfortunately endanger to commit rape on a non-controversial basis and fall into a state of spiritual schizophrenicness, before which all must be strictly observed, as for any point it can be bordered by a miracle.
Jakub Bożydar Wiśniewski
