A vow is not a symbolic gesture

The Constitutional Court has fresh judges? The event organised by the talker of the Parliament of Vladimir Czarzasty completes the formalities for appointing fresh members of the Constitutional Tribunal?
– It was no vow, not before the Sejm, not even legal. It was an event that was attempted to impersonate this procedure. Not even the Sejm was called at the time, not sitting. Furthermore, there was no organization space in which an act of specified fundamental systemic importance could be carried out. We are dealing with a situation where the form has been replaced by appearance and the procedure – improvisation. The law in this respect is peculiarly clear. The vow is not a symbolic motion or a courteous expression that can be read anywhere and from anyone. It is simply a legal act of a strictly defined nature, made orally before the competent authority – to the President. And this body is not a substance of political designation or convenience. He's indicated in the regulations. Any effort to circumvent this rule is not an ‘alternative interpretation’, but a simple violation of the rules. Simplest example? Members and Senators. In large groups there are always random situations – individual gets sick, individual cannot appear in the first time. And then what? Is he sending a message in the message or taking an oath to a notary or voivode? Of course not. He shall wait and curse before the competent authority, orally, in the prescribed procedure. This is simply a standard of law, not a question of goodwill.