Sławomir N. Gworzycki: "THE DECLARATION OF THE SIXTH", HAVE REPEATED THE SECRET CASTLE IN THE TIME OF president CAMPAN. Part III: Bow to the Jews.
Point 4 “Declaration of sixteen” refers to “a tiny Polish judaic community”, where it is suggested that this community necessarily show “gifts of kindness” and “signs of respect”, that is, as we realize it, distinguishing Jews at the expense of ourselves. It is simply a very wide thematic trend in Polish-language mass media, and in Polish-language public circulation at all, including many Polish-language films and tv series that arise at the expense of an excruciating Polish payer who is not usually aware that he pays for it.
We will no longer compose about these other, increasingly numerous, non-Catholics from the controversies directed to the Holy Catholic Religion, due to the fact that this is simply a very broad subject.
specified awards aimed at Jews appear to be peculiarly awkward – let us admit – just now, i.e. during the war in Gaza and Lebanon; of which the current events of this "sixteen" do not mention at all, referring to the atolls already ritually (!), on the rule of universally applicable "mantra" (!), to the German aggression against Jews (and against Poles) shown in a period which was already distant during the Second planet War, and emphasizing the sufferings of Poles and Jews experienced from German hands.
"Sixteen", while remaining as much as possible in the above mentioned stream of pro-Jewish universal message, in respective places of its very short "Declaration" kind of ties the case of Jews-Judaists with the issue of Poles-goys with the usage of this hostile German hand during the Second planet War.
And the kid asks whether the late German Chancellor Hitler is to be, in practice, this patron of present – not ten, not thirty, not fifty, but eighty years after the end of the Second planet War – “Polish-Jewish reconciliation”, only after all the witnesses of those events died by nature.
Another way: "conciliation" is to be essential for Poles (!) and irrevocably (!) in the current era (!), despite the fact that the only conditions exploited by his supporters in the form of blows given 4 generations ago by the erstwhile Germans inevitably drift distant in time, and others simply deficiency (!).
Indeed, the insistent vocation of the centuries-old presence of Jews in any country/state—two 100 years, 8 100 years, 1 1000 years, 2 1000 years—excited by specified talk, the private goj corresponds to the day-to-day: “and enough...”.
And conquering this besides by "sixteen", as we can see, the cultivated "historical policy" will not help, for example, in a fewer years ago, in respective series of exhibitions on the main squares of Polish villages and towns of these stones devoted to the alleged righteous among the nations of the world; and it will not aid that even at the beginning of the 21st century, as it was announced on the waves of a radio station, 1 young priest "with a brother" in how short a time sought these "righteous" thousands, thousands...
And even those deeper actions of any of the nominally Catholic clergy that we do not want to mention here (not all at once!) will not help.
And this will not aid all due to the fact that the more distant events in time, the little people they inspire to act. That's it!
Thus, any effort to "formate" fresh events, whether artificial or artificial, with a replacement status, to conquer, revive and carry out their cause. And what else are all these yearly Khanuki, for example? The signatories of the Declaration of the Sixteenth decided, apparently, to join these another people's activities, and simultaneously to dismiss the presidential candidacy of Mr Grzegorz Braun. They may not have responded to anything. "Silence – gold...".
Therefore, for the time we do not know which we meet in the present Polish media message with this "reductio ad Hitlerum", to which "must" be silenced in all factual arguments, and this in the cases referred to by the "sixteen" with the second planet war of a direct relation not having.
What do we care, and what about the Khanuk in the Polish Sejm, the Hitler? What is this magical quadrangle of Poles-Germany-Jews-Second planet War, in which among another things these "sixteen" have insisted on holding us and not releasing us from it (for example, not to talk about another matters in a meaningful way, these second planet War is closer in time, it is further)?
We are besides dealing with a kind of social blackmail. Especially due to the fact that – what the mass media always print small about – the presence of "Jewish society" in Poland, but this political, economical and another areas of life cannot be described as "little". Otherwise, why would the "sixteen" take the floor, and that is part of the presidential campaign? We're just asking.
In point 4 of the Poles it is further called upon to show no more than that, but "honors for our common centuries-old history", Polish-Jewish, of course; which we have already signaled above. After all, as the signatories of the Declaration must surely know, "it is impossible to be civilised in 2 ways" (Conecular Felix, so much so by many of the "sixteen" respected). So there are 2 parallel stories – Polish and judaic – happening in the same territory.
As we read in Nobel laureate Alexander Solzenicin in his “Two 100 years together”, the Russians had a “pretension” to Poles, that together with the erstwhile russian Tsars' lands incorporated in Russia, millions of Jews, in the Moscow Czaria were previously absent. And then, as we know, another story.
Point 4 ‘Declarations of sixteen’ concludes an interesting sentence, which itself should be developed to the size of a separate hearing:
"Before the war, the Primate Hlond lamented the deficiency of respect for the 'undescribed tragedy of this nation' (as we understand, the judaic nation – S.N.G.). This should be all the more clear today."
Do we get it right? So, then, does this “sixteen” command us to show “gents of kindness” and “signs of respect” to the Jews have conditions not only from the events of the Second planet War but besides from the earlier ones before that war, those before Hitler? This is “in modern narrative” new! Let us remind that during the period of the earlier planet War I, German troops on Polish lands and in Russia were greeted by Jews with bread and salt.
And why does the “sixteen” put the individual Primate Hlond in his pro-Jewish speech? Primate Hlond “before the war” (the Second World), and the Khanukka in the Polish Sejm today! What's this equilibristic connection? Let us guard, indeed, the honour and remembrance of Primate Hlond.
Why, then, since not yet due to Nazi activity, has this “indescribable tragedy” of the nation, as we realize it, the judaic one? He besides leaves the "Sixteen" to his readers in this respect as a origin of understatement.
Point 5 “Declaration of sixteen” states: “The Christian nature of the state is primarily included in the publically expressed worship of God and of the religion of the Church, and in the realization of the common good, including, in the right way, all community and individual forming the community of the Republic.”
This is most likely not taken from St. Thomas Aquinata, on which at least any of the "sixteen" like to trust so much. So, where? We ask due to the fact that we don't have an thought for an answer.
And does this Polish statehood – here: not society, not nation, but state-political organization – have a “Christian character”? Really? And are the laws written here and fulfilled in accordance with the Holy Catholic Doctrine?
“In the right way” – in this context this insert means everything and nothing, so it requires an explanation that we do not find in the “Declaration”.
"Every community and individual forming the community of the Republic". Are besides those, especially after 2015, and even more so since 2022, the crowds of alien refugees, those "multi-kulti", most of those post-Soviet, and all their necessarily non-Catholic (!), now from all parts of the world? Are the crowds of those who extorted Polish citizenship free of charge or for money and those who search the chance to do so? Did all these Polish-speaking state workers of different levels who just let these abroad crowds into Poland?
Organizers of the seismic Khanuki – as even in this wide scope of mass media were given – are besides from abroad. Invasion of “foreign” on the Polish Sejm. But let us remember this from a twelve years ago – most likely January 2014 – the corporate invasion of this "foreign" on... Wawel. "Everything has already been," and that it has been, it is worth remembering and drawing appropriate working conclusions from it. And now the mystery of the local-varsavianistic:
The name of this Judaistic community arranged by the Seym Khanuka is large letters lined (maybe forged?) on the wall of 1 of the largest sized flat blocks in the northern part of Warsaw, in a place crowdedly frequented by passersby, well visible, besides for passengers waiting at a certain tram stop. Where is it? And why in that part of town? We do not decide which of these questions is the harder answer. But here's another puzzle, or alternatively a "conundrum" of the local-varsavianistic (there are so many of them):
Unfortunately, we did not follow the organisation and construction of the Katyń Museum in its current office – in the Warsaw Citadel. But how does everything should be taken care of?
Here are the visitors, so besides foreigners, the worst erstwhile they do not have a Polish friend next to them, who would catch up with them in a flash and immediately correct the thing, on this outdoor section of the way they encounter, unexpectedly, behind the bend, a glass wall with the Shield of David, and behind it, inside a deep recess, a plaque with thousands of names signed with the general name “Katyń”. due to the fact that there are inactive “Charks”, “Miednoje” and others.
This is expected to be a puzzle, so we do not give further description of the views and insights available there, encouraging P.T. Readers – as always in specified cases – to “in real” practice, carefully and attentively, this cognitive shock. How – after all, according to the intentions of the authors (!!!) of that museum facility – did foreigners in the conversation between themselves find the national and spiritual affiliation of these many people mentioned under the name “Katyń”?
And – whether, and if so, how, this or any another accompanying Polish colleague or Polish colleague reacted. After all, graduates of the school "mean 3 years".
Isn't that besides true, including in another museum and/or memorial buildings in today's Poland, that on the line of statements known to us from the erstwhile days of the Declaration of Sixteen?
Let's decision on... For the appearance in public discourse of these no longer German, not non-national, but "Polish Nazis", what was here in Poland, among others, "camps of extermination built", for years was expected with fear. Who will “recall” them here and when? Who do you mean? “Minister of Education” of the Polish-speaking government!
Oh, sixteen! Can't you truly see, or are you just pretending that they're not recognized by you? There's no telling what's worse. Playing with symbols is, contrary to appearances, very dangerous.
Why should this point 5 of Declaration 16 serve? Reading her text increases in the usual recipient of his anxiety that "somewhere he was dressed in an ornate and tailed at Mass" (Sienkiewicz, Mr Zagloba, "Trilogy"). I hope we're wrong.
At the end of point 6 “Declaration of sixteen” of our concern does not get any worse. There is simply a request for “a motivated presentation of Christian and Polish rations”. And the motivation for this is to be the “religious tension between Christianity and Judaism” – after all, an old thing as Christianity itself and as rabbinic Judaism; twice as old as the written past of Poland. “Sixteen” adds the tensions between Poland and Israel concerning our history.”
At erstwhile we counter: we Poles have had adequate of all the "strengths" and the subsequent placing of the Polish Nation together with its achievements towards demolition and destruction, so we want to stay as far distant from all the entities-partners causing any kind of "strength" and in addition insistently imposing these "strengths" on us.
It is, most likely a small bit of judaic scum watered, but at the same time – let us admit – gladly by us for worshipful amusement watched Polish-language comedy, whose characters are, let us call it, prominent burglars. There's this dialogue:
- Quinto, the tight 1 wants to talk to you.
- Tell Shorty to unzip.
So much for the signatories to the Declaration of Sixteen in terms of "strings", "strings", " fasteners" and the broad subject substance associated with them.
In our opinion, too, the serial reader and recipients of media stimuli, these are the speeches specified as the "Declaration of the Sixteenth" discussed here, which exacerbate these tensions, due to the fact that they irritate Poles, or goys, especially due to the fact that this "presentation of the right" in the performance of the "sixteenth" is simply dull, unthought-out, seemingly improvised and not motivated.
The average Poles of earlier generations, surely inactive born in the early 20th century (plus-minus 1 100 and 20 years ago) to our efforts here to respond to this "sixteen" would have moved us with pity and discouraged us: "What is the incomprehensible b... these people write? How can you do that? Boy, leave it, don't bother... Any thought who these people are? Stay distant from specified people, so don't even compose about what they wrote.” That's the kind of advice we'd most likely hear.
alternatively than ellipse around and key around the subject of the seismic Khanuka signatories to the Declaration should not, precisely in the name of sincerity, declare that they, the undersigned, do not want this, and this named citizen at the office of the president of the Republic of Poland, due to the fact that they support another candidate for this office, besides named by them by name?
In view of the “motivated presentation” mentioned by them, they are “a dramatic obstacle” – as they compose – to any “act of aggression, hostility and the spread of prejudice”. And we, close the end of the discussion of the text signed by them, correspond to the Polish proverb: "He brought the kettle to the pot and the tar itself."
What disturbing curtains are besides avoided, and especially in paragraphs 7 and 16? Their speech is to be “a appeal to all who care for the Christian character of public life and the common good of the people.” Christian? But in defence of just non-Christian ceremonies in the centres of this "public life", what are the Presidential Palace and the Sejm? And the freedom of these abroad rituals depends... on the common good of the Polish people?
So that's a threat! So this is – blackmail! After all, not the first to be subjected to “Poland after communism”. But by whom, under what circumstances and in what form now announced? What a sad surprise!
Do we realize any of this? Yes, we realize that individual wants to hurt us again, and we are not even allowed to complain about it.
For their part, the signatories to the Declaration of Sixteen want to destruct from public life phenomena that “destroy public life, Catholic culture and disfigure the image of Homeland” (sic!).
They appeal – attention! “O reaction, o active opposition to behaviour, attitudes and opinions...”. “O active opposition”!!! besides in the face of only (and until) "opinion", which they do not like.
So the communicative is circled. Is it time to get scared? And keep an eye out, since people signed under the Declaration of Sixteen in the general opinion, as far as we know, have not been associated with the application of "active opposition" to any political adversaries. In turn, they themselves did not express praise for conducting public discourse by specified "active" methods. So it changed. But it is nothing: “Fears on Lachy.”
The number of signatories to the Declaration, just the "sixteen", sounds – let us admit it – unfortunate. "Sixteen" were patriots from the Polish Underground State tried, imprisoned and in parts tortured in Moscow by Bolsheviks. These here and now they could choice or capture even 1 to make it not sixteen. With these "sixteen" it is simply a sad catch we suspect, however, not delicate to specified matters Artificial Intelligence.
And who signed it? any names are better known, others are not. There are at least 2 environments, for many years, due to the fact that inactive from the 20th century – attention! – having any merit (sic!) in, most generally, spreading in Poland cognition previously present very small or not; but mostly – although it has been different – not having long-term access to these mass media the widest range.
However, any of these authors have had access to at least specified publishers or editors for years now, which at a advanced level (for present Polish conditions) supply them with the editing and, most importantly, promotion and distribution of books and another publications written by them, and in another form preaching their views.
But – we ask due to the fact that we do not know – whether from the newer content of this work, and late besides from the public and sometimes political activities of these people, is there any announcement of this “Declaration of sixteen”? Well, who knew? Another way:
Do these people, through the Declaration of Sixteen, want to point out to the wide scope of audiences their message to any intriguing content, but in their available work to us, present small or no?
And finally, who came up with this idea? Now! During the war in Gaza, Ukraine and the presidential run in Poland. Who is the author of the text "Declaration 16", which he encouraged the others to sign? And did the others sign without reading, in assurance for the author's authority? That's not good! Or did they sign after reading? That's besides bad!
Signatories of the Declaration of Sixteen have performed and proceed to do so to say, as arbitrators in many areas of today, specified as culture, discipline and Polish politics. any of them besides conviction officially, as members or even presidents of Nobel Prize-winning bodies.
Now what? We, if given – life brings us various surprises – to whatever degree to present to their judgement any manifestations of our existence and/or activities, any work or content we preach, or, for example, whether we are at a table or on a streetcar, behave nicely or uglyly, after the apparent “Declaration of sixteen” we already openly and categorically blame the impartiality of specified an arbitrator and request a change of his or all of their “judge composition”. Well, they ruled themselves out and annulled. Was it truly “worth this skin for an expedition”?
Unless, as in the introduction to this statement, this is all to blame for this playful Artificial Intelligence, however... by individual built and programmed.
