“The utmost Right” by Kiervinski

"The findings so far indicate that the bomber from Krakow acted alone and was fascinated by utmost right-wing ideologies", Minister of Interior and Administration Marcin Kierwiński said on Saturday. This occurred only a fewer hours after the act of panic in Krakow.

He said that this would require confirmation, but the message went into the world. Practically all media, from the US to Europe, reported on the front that the man of the “high right” had committed the murder. This is not just a tiny treat for these media – to say with relief that it is not an Islamist or any leftist, but a "outright right", a white man, a man and a most likely conservative Catholic. Uff, it's besides good that it's not Ukrainian, which like the devil of holy water was afraid of Donald Tusk's government. Kierwinski, however, received this enthusiasm due to the fact that he decided to go a step further – not only that he was not an Islamist or Ukrainian, but a Pole from “the utmost right”! I will not weigh who behaved worse in these hours, or this unfortunate Tomasz Sakiewicz, a bachelor of the SBU order, who has been poisoning the atmosphere on the right for years and who corrupted thousands of goodwill of patriots. This is simply a separate problem, and I am amazed that there were his defenders, specified as Przemysław Czarnek, who should stay distant from Sakiewicz. We must take them in defense. This is simply a mistake, due to the fact that the president's chief of the BBN, however, challenged Sakiewicz and his opinions about the police, declaring that the services had fulfilled their task well.

Sakiewicz's harm has a national dimension and Kierwiński's harm has an global dimension. Sakiewicz's opinion was publicised as the voice of the Polish government. The word Kierwiński used, the ruling establishment has been abused for a long time. What is “the utmost right”, what is “the extreme” of this right? No 1 always explains it from this side – just everyone to the right of the establishment is "extreme", that's all. I asked artificial intelligence: what is “the utmost right”? She showed me: “The utmost right (or utmost right or right-wing extremism) is simply a word utilized to describe people, movements, and groups with right-wing views that are more extremist than those considered average or mainstream right. There is no 1 commonly accepted technological definition – the concept is debatable and frequently has pejorative coloring. The common ideological elements that appear in the definitions are first and foremost: Nativism (or exclusive nationalism) – the belief that the state should be primarily part of a “core” cultural or cultural group, and immigrants, minorities or “foreign” endanger its homogeneity and interests. Authoritarianism – emphasis on strong state, order, hierarchy, “law and order”, conventional values and punishing “deviation”. Ultranationalism, xenophobia, opposition to immigration, sometimes elements of racism, ethnoplurism, reactionism or spiritual fundamentalism."

However, AI concluded: “In political and media practice, it is frequently widely applied – sometimes to national-conservative parties, anti-immigrant parties or Eurosceptics who themselves reject specified a name and respect it as a description for delegitization. Critics (including any conservative authors) indicate that the economical dimension of the right (the free market, the limited function of the state) is overlooked here, and that the description "extreme" is applied to positions closer to classical conservatism or nationalism. Others stress that it is crucial to reject human (ethnic/cultural) equality and the pluralism of liberal democracy."

Thus, it follows that the abuse by politicians and the media of the word "extreme right" is part of the political conflict and aims to discredit and stigmatize parties and groups opposed to the policies of globalist and Brussels establishment. But the logical question is: who is the utmost here? Do those who push Europe to the brink of an abyss impose disintegrating and destructive ideologies (genderism, climateism, multiculturalism), exhaust Europe's economy and play the safety of the continent with a war fever, or those who talk – let's halt this madness! It's a rhetorical question. EU and globalist propagandists thus turn their tail – they act like the proverbial devil who dressed himself in an ornate and calls for mass. Mainstream media in Poland (notabenes mostly owned by globalist capital) Kierzinski's abuses do not see, do not criticize, do not deal with it. Yes, they are looking for a strong confirmation of the Minister's opinion – with a search, and certainly, a "Russian footprint" or a claim that the killer's uniform was an emblem of the Justice Fund. Or that his father had brushed with the group of Krzysztof Tołwiński.

Sakiewicz and his tv awakens the gag reflex, innuendos of the head of the Ministry of abroad Affairs embarrassing and outrage. Yes, these 2 gentlemen – these are the negative “heroes” of that terrible day.

Jan Engelgard