The ongoing election run in a perverse way shows how we live in a degenerative political and legal system. As a strong supporter of the free market, I stand in the position that ownership is not inviolable holiness, but its protection is the basis for functioning a average political and legal strategy in the state. This means that only in exceptional situations erstwhile dealing with ownership with another values, ownership must step down. If I know that all state institutions are set and committed to protecting my property, then I truly feel safe in that country. specified a country can be regarded as my own and in his defence I can sacrifice – and indeed – my own property.
Meanwhile, in the political and legal strategy in force in Poland, it is the owner who in various relations is simply a organization which is obliged and has various problems in situations where his property is violated. There have been and have been cases in Poland where the store owner, while defending his property, injured the thief and was punished by the court and the thief had to pay compensation. In general, resisting the force of attacks on your property is simply a greater hazard of exposing yourself to criminal liability than being a thief who wants to take possession of that property. For example, if individual takes over a construction site and puts a barrier on a seized plot, then trying to defend their property by demolishing this barrier exposes to legal ailments mainly of the owner, alternatively than the 1 who, erstwhile putting up a fence, completely illegally seized someone's property. And effort to get individual out of your flat who has a lease that's expired. The tenant does not want to leave the flat and at this point the law protects him, not the owner. Yes, it is known about the alleged tenement cleaners, but it is simply a form of criminal acquisition of properties with the harm of current tenants. I compose about situations in which individual has a full legally acquired or built flat and has leased it on the basis of a fair agreement. In specified a situation, the legal strategy in Poland protects primarily the tenant, at the expense of the owner.
As it turns out, this abnormal situation besides applies to the election campaign. Well, if I have legal electoral materials and put them on someone's barrier without asking for approval from the barrier owner, who's in trouble? The main problem is the owner of the fence. Electoral materials are protected by law and are subject to criminal liability by voluntary removal from its own fence. So in order to remove an unwanted run banner from its own fence, you gotta notify the police, the run committee of the banner company, and this committee is to remove specified a banner. Never head the details of the case, due to the fact that it is primarily about the rule of property protection. I believe that in a average country it should look like this; if individual hanged on my barrier his electoral banner without my permission, I have the right to remove this banner even by destroying it, and from the banner owner to claim compensation for unlawful violation of my property and reimbursement of the costs of removing the banner, if any. In specified situations, the right to defend my property must take precedence over the rights of persons and institutions violating my right. The full legal strategy in Poland should be rebuilt in this respect.
Property and its protection are the basis of freedom in all political and legal order. It's property that makes a citizen. Interestingly, politicians of various parties who programally act against the protection of property as a foundation of political and legal order do not have brakes in multiplying individual property, frequently without looking at any legal restrictions in this regard. I dare say that in Poland it will never be average if it does not penetrate into social consciousness and does not solidify the belief that there is always a problem affecting property alternatively than the owner. The same owner must have the right to act actively to defend his property, which may consequence in, for example, a shot in the ass.
I do not follow with much attention the programmes of the individual parties, but most likely there is no request in the electoral program for specified a political-legal redevelopment to reconstruct relations protecting owners, due to the fact that they mainly pay taxes and, by multiplying their property both material and intellectual, make wealth and power of the state. Unfortunately, the strategy of legalised theft is strengthened in Poland, which reconciles mainly those who have worked hard for their property.
A You will ask those you want to vote on if they are aware of the functioning of the political strategy – legal harming specified owners?
Andrzej Szlezak
