"GREEN NOTE! legislature treacherously seeks to integrate US and Israeli armies"

grazynarebeca5.blogspot.com 1 month ago

SOTN Editorial note: As if to prove beyond uncertainty that the full U.S. national government is simply a treacherous and rebellious ZOG (a government occupied by Zionists), The U.S. legislature is now seriously considering a bill that effectively "integrates the US Army and Israel".

"US government is now explicitly occupied by Zionists, and the treacherous U.S. Congress, and no uncertainty promoted by president Donald Trump, has taken a step towards a merger of US and Israeli forces." — Tim Brown

In the light of this totally treacherous legislative initiative, it should be absolutely clear that BARBARBARANTS ARE IN THE BRAM, as they were long before the national Reserve Act of 1913 was passed.

The fact that there is virtually no account of this brazen and reckless betrayal of legislature by CIA Mockingbird Media, is proof of the pure secrecy and betrayal that this devastating act of deep betrayal takes place secretly.

SUMMARY

PATRIOT ALERT!
If Trump does not argue Section 224 of the NDAA of 2027, he must be prosecuted, convicted
and severely punished!

State of the Nation 4
June 2026

Note: Below is simply a brief summary of this Zionist coup.


Congress quietly seeks to integrate the US and Israel armies

In the first step towards further directing aid into the shadow, the NDAA home of 2027 would almost completely unite the armed forces of both countries.

Ben Freeman
REPLY POLICY

At a time erstwhile the American public expresses an unprecedented level of distrust of the Israeli government, legislature has just proposed linking the US to the Israeli military more than always before.WeTuesday version The National Defence Authorisation Act (NDAA) published on Tuesday is section 224 titled "United States and Israel's Technology Cooperation Initiative on Defence Technologies". This provision would most likely link the U.S. military to Israelis more than US$200 billion (considered after inflation) military aid which Israel received from the US since its inception in 1948.Article 224 provides the basis for bilateral investigation and development, arms co-production, joint ventures, licensing agreements and seemingly all kinds of American-Israeli-military-industrial cooperation. The US and Israel are already working intensively in the field of rocket defence, but this plan would greatly extend coordination to almost all area of defence technology, including AI, quantum systems, autonomous systems, directed energy, cybernetics, biotechnology and much more. It besides proposes "network integration" and "data fusion". In another words, U.S. military data could shortly become Israeli data.If full implemented, this proposal will guarantee a higher level of military-industrial integration than the US with any another country in the world. Of course, the US worked closely with its NATO partners on co-production and joint supply chains, primarily through Defence Production Action Plan. And as number 1 among arms dealers in the world, the U.S. delivers weapons to armies around the world. But this is mostly a one-way street where the U.S. supplies arms to abroad buyers who only occasionally produce parts for these weapons themselves, as in the case of Global supply chain F-35.Section 224 would be a completely different case. Combining the US and Israel defence sector in many key areas for future battlefields specified as autonomous systems and cybernetics. This would besides bring a remarkable Israeli influence to the United States, beyond what they already have thanks to Israeli lobby and its expanded network influencersin the media Social. This would give the Israeli government the chance to importantly grow 1 of the most powerful tools of influence in US policy: jobs in the US. By expanding or launching fresh co-production plants, as is already the case in Mississippi and Arkansas, the Israeli government could boast of providing jobs in the United States, thus gaining allies among members of legislature representing the districts where these jobs are located.As a result, the U.S. political strategy may be even more prone to the whims of the Israeli government, which seemingly has no opposition to US engagement in armed conflicts against Middle East.This unprecedented level of military integration between the US and Israel clearly contrasts with the conventional defence cooperation aid model, in which Israel had previously distinguished itself as the largest recipient of American military assistance. As presented in The fresh briefingQuincy Institute, by Steven Simon, this change from the aid model to the military integration model has worrying consequences, namely:

This change will deprive the political and diplomatic supervisory mechanisms that make the relation publically responsible, transferring it from a visible yearly vote on assistance to an opaque defence mechanics where supervision is limited and the political minimum responsibility. The consequence would be a defensive relation that would be both deeper and little transparent.

All this It happens at a time erstwhile the Israeli army multipleusedAmerican weapons in attacks violating global humanitarian law in Gaza, and Israel has repeatedly broken ceasefires (like the US itself) in an unnecessary Trump administration war with Iran.

A immense gap between what most Americans want and what the president is doing about Israel and what legislature is proposing should not be ignored. Only 30% of respondents in poll The fresh York Times/Sienna of mid-May believes Trump made a "right decision" about the war with Iran, while 64% believe it was wrong. Survey The Institute for Global Affairs published earlier this week went deeper into the American psyche on Israel's reinforcement, stating that "Only 16 percent believe that the United States should proceed to supply Israel arms without fresh restrictions. Thirty-eight percent want to halt delivering weapons completely, and another 24 percent want the weapon to be dependent on the way it is used."

However, the main leadership of both parties remains mostly pro-Israeli and continues to form the basic legislative text before amendments and wider congressional debate open it to full assembly, as is the case with this NDAA record.

However, the situation is slow changing in both parties as more and more members argue the increasing division between Israel's actions and America's interests. For example, Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) wrote Tuesday at The fresh York Times that "The Democratic organization provided reflexive and unconditional support to Israeli governments, even erstwhile their actions increasingly undermined American interests and values." On the Republican side, MP Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and erstwhile congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Green (R-Ga.) openly condemned the devastating influence of the Israeli lobby — a position that could at least partially cost them both seats in Congress.

What can another members of legislature do who fear the destabilising actions of Israel at the moment? halt the Israeli-American military-industrial connection at the start. Legislators should reject Section 224 of the NDAA in order to avoid deep integration with the Israeli military at a time erstwhile more and more Americans are opposed to Israel's actions in the region.

_______
https://respondsiblestatecraft.org/israel-us-military/


Translated by Google Translator

source:https://stateofthenation.info/

Read Entire Article