In the U.S. state of Texas, a long-standing legal conflict ended between the peace justice Dianne Hensley, who refused to give vows to deviant couples, citing her spiritual beliefs. After years of litigation received $640,000 in damages and reimbursement of legal expenses, and the court found that her rights under the Texas Law on spiritual Freedom had been violated. It is simply a large triumph over the ideology of the utmost left and its favourite form of political struggle, or censorship and ostracism.
The justice won with ideological force from the Left. The case began in 2019 erstwhile the State Judicial Ethics Commission gave Hensley a public reproof for refusing to conduct wedding ceremonies for Sodomite couples. According to the committee, this could undermine the assurance in the impartiality of the judge. However, Hensley argued that she did not deny anyone access to state services, but that she herself did not want to personally participate in ceremonies that contradict her Christian conscience.
After respective years of trial, the situation turned 180 degrees. The Commission withdrew earlier sanctions and the court granted compensation to the justice and prohibited further prosecution for akin spiritual decisions. Moreover, the Texas ultimate Court clarified the principles of judicial ethics, pointing out that simply refraining from taking vows due to sincere spiritual beliefs does not constitute a violation of the ethics code.
This case goes far beyond the dispute over single - sex matrimony itself. It concerns the fundamental question: does the state have the right to force a citizen to act against his own conscience simply due to the fact that his views do not correspond to the current dominant ideology?
In fresh years, Western societies have witnessed always stronger ideological force from the utmost left. Freedom, diversity and tolerance sound good in electoral slogans, but in practice it frequently turns out that only those who accept the existing worldview line are concerned. erstwhile a individual dares to differ, abruptly only racist and homophobic insults stay from tolerance.
This is peculiarly evident in matters related to sodomites and genderism. Only recently, the discussion of biological differences between women and men was obvious. Today, in many environments, the specified question of the limits of neo-lyssentic ideology can be regarded as a manifestation of “the speech of hatred”. Paradoxically, then, the era that was to bring about an unfettered debate is increasingly producing lists of subjects that are not appropriate to talk about.
The case of justice Hensley besides shows another problem of the modern Western – a tendency to administratively punish people for their views. alternatively of a factual debate on arguments (this left usually loses), censorship mechanisms and force are emerging on the rule of "agree or face professional consequences". It is hard not to announcement that this resembles ideological logic known from totalitarian countries, although present packed with more modern slogans and more attractive marketing.
Of course, supporters of the modern variant of the communist revolution will guarantee that it is all about "the fight against discrimination". The problem is that in practice, this increasingly means acceptance forced by state institutions. You may have your own opinion, provided that it is appropriate. You can talk – provided you say what you request to say. You can believe – provided that religion does not affect any decisions. Clearly, the modern definition of freedom can be highly creative.
Dianne Hensley's judgement is seen in the US as an crucial signal for the defenders of freedom of conscience. Regardless of the attitude to alleged deviating marriages, the court recalled that the state should not punish citizens for peacefully following its own spiritual beliefs. And even if he tries to do so, the bill for specified an ideological experimentation can prove very costly – in this case precisely $640,000.
We besides recommend: A sex deviant murdered her parents
