

Friday 27 June The ultimate Court will present at public hearings the results of re-examination of election cards from those committees on which there were doubts about the mysterious "flow" of the votes cast from 1 candidate to another.
According to various announcements, a full of over 30,000 electoral protests are scheduled to go to SN. By comparison, in 2020 there were about 5.8 1000 specified protests.
Thousands of electoral protests. erstwhile SN spokesman: This is not a evidence at all
— But that's 30,000. That's not a evidence number. The real evidence was in 1995, erstwhile Alexander Kwasniewski became president. At the time there were close to a million protests, he tells Onet SN justice and erstwhile spokesperson for this court Michał Laskowski.
— It was then about the education of president Kwasniewski, his master's degree. And almost all these protests were about this issue. Their designs were even printed in newspapers. This year there will most likely be a greater variety of topics of protests, and any of them will most likely be about miscalculations erstwhile counting votes in regional committees," said justice Laskowski.
In any of these committees, the votes after the decision of the SN were recalculated by territory courts. According to “Gazeta Wyborcza”, the results of this recalculation of the votes are so far classified – that the results of the examination of the cards will not be made public for the time being were to be decided by the SN Extraordinary Control Chamber.
– I do not know what is the motivation of specified a movement with the cover-up of the results of the examination of cards, possibly the Extraordinary Control Chamber wants to present the results of these reviews in full. In turn erstwhile it comes to miscalculations, they besides happened in the past. However, I don't remember a situation where in respective cases votes were counted in favour of another candidate. And here we are dealing with something like this, and it has not happened erstwhile that both candidates are gaining, equally. On the contrary, here we have a unilateral movement, in favour of only 1 candidate. And the task of the SN is to explain this – noted justice Laskowski.
What's the procedure?
The ultimate Court must issue a decision on the validity of the elections by 2 July. Until then, he must recognise all the electoral protests he considers justified.
— First, each protest is recognized by the composition of 3 SN judges. According to the current law they are judges from SN Extraordinary Control Chamber. Also, this full home states whether the elections were important. Options are possible with annulment of the elections in part of the committee and even across the country. Is specified a script possible today? I don’t think so,” emphasizes the judge.
— Besides, we know present that the number of votes that went to another candidate was respective thousand, and the difference between the candidates in the election is respective 100 1000 votes. Thus, it is not likely that those miscounted will accumulate adequate to overwhelm and change the consequence of the vote – the erstwhile SN spokesperson reserves.
Problem with the unrecognized SN chamber. “The home of Extraordinary Control is not a court”
“The problem with the Control Chamber is real. And he won't disappear, no substance how loud the president is going to be. We have a ruling from the EU Court of Justice (TEU), which shows that this Chamber cannot be treated as a legal court," says justice Laskowski.
“It is up to the I president of the SN, Ms Margaret Manowska, to find a way to solve this problem. but she's not even looking for him, seemingly she's comfortable with the way things are. And that's what makes people halt trusting SN due to the fact that they don't trust the Control Chamber, where there are people associated with the politicians of today's opposition. The consequence may be that no substance what decision on the validity of the election will be issued by the Extraordinary Control Chamber, for any people it will be an unreliable decision, due to the fact that it is issued by people whose impartiality may be doubtful for any – he points out.
– To calm the public, the decision on the election should be made by those judges who have no specified doubts – summarize justice SN.