Did anyone anticipate this reaction from the public after the president vetoed the SAFE Act? Rather, no one, and surely not the governing coalition, which mattered to the anticipation of veto but not with specified an assessment of Poles, whose 62% supported this decision.
https://news.wp.pl/network-inflamed-po-wacie-president-surprising-evaluation-polakow-7263831764576576a
After this decision, the rumble of the lost politicians began, beginning with the Prime Minister, the rotating Blacksmith, the ministers and another members of the government, up to a fewer notable MPs, serving only to vote as instructed. Epithets, allegations, Chamian reactions are "normal" behaviour of ruling elites. no of the critics presented any substantive reason to cast uncertainty among the unattractive observers of this embarrassing spectacle.
In a hurry to proceed with the bill, the government could present its own arguments regarding this loan, e.g. the finance minister, to present the actual cost of handling this loan, even a proxy asked straight about the costs avoided or did not know the answer to this question. The President, on the basis of expert calculations, showed the ineffectiveness of this "gescheft". And the government was silent. The Prime Minister known for being "no 1 to go in the Union will win" could influence the non-insertion of the alleged "milestones" in the agreement, and this was 1 of the main reasons for the presidential veto.
I wonder why the government is taking the "B" plan alternatively of the next session of the Sejm trying to reject the President's veto. Coalition with specified intellectual possible as MP Zembaczyński or MP A.M. Żukowska not counting specified as Prime Minister, Deputy Premiere or min.Sikorski and the rotary marshal The black might be able to convince the MPs and reject the President's veto.
I besides urge to readers to read the study of the German Bundestag, which warns that the EU's flagship defence plan may be illegal. https://www.politico.eu/article/flagship-eu-defense-plan-faces-legal-scrutiny-german-bundestag-report-warns/?fbclid=IwY2xjawQgsEpleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETBnNZWtObXhiRexPQMyc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHp2UqMI9-GXQ5gSdr9_2YgI2-4j4JDFhCTQ5uPJzQFY0Zxpg9Ekmov_EbahHPb1s_pxHRrwjrVeA
Account should besides be taken of the compatibility of the task with the Constitution. In this regard, Mr Miller took the floor, below what he said:
"Polish legal order is governed by the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. And the constitution introduces a clear principle: the state cannot make major financial commitments solely by decision of the government. In specified cases, a bill passed by Parliament and signed by the president is needed. That's why any lawyers think it's obvious. If SAFE means a financial commitment to the Union for Poland, it should not be possible to launch the programme full without the signature of the President".
