W The parliament first reads a government draft of changes to education law to enable a broad programme reform. The task involves replacing compulsory learning content with ‘learning outcomes’, which may limit the autonomy of teachers and lead to the same formation of pupils according to a set pattern. The aims of the improvement are based on the paper "Alumni and postgraduate profile", promoting the dissemination of climate ideology, and the demands of the rainbow deviating movement.
A fresh effort to ideologicalize schools is underway. Last Wednesday at the session of the Sejm Committee on Education and Science, the first reading of the government's draft law amending the law took place. – Educational law and any another laws (printing No 1857). The aim of the project, as it is justified, is to enable "comprehensive programme improvement in kindergartens and schools".
An crucial change introduced by the task is the modification of the definition of the programming basis. The concept of "obligatory teaching content" disappears from the current version, and in its place appears "learning outcomes" and requirements for "educational experience".
The omission in the fresh definition of obligatory issues may lead to any omission of certain content by the teacher, especially erstwhile he is forced to adjust the material to the class in which the students will find themselves in improvement norm and students with intellectual disabilities. This should be taken into account peculiarly in the context of the progressive “inclusive education” in Polish schools.
Secondly, it is equally important, if not a major change in the fresh definition, to quit teaching content. The project's authors argue that the concept of ‘learning outcomes’ replacing them is broader and includes, inter alia, cognition to be passed on to the student and ‘social competences’. However, erstwhile we pay attention to the common knowing of the concepts of "content" and "effects", we see crucial differences in their meaning. Content is something that is conveyed – in the teaching process it is certain information, cognition given by the teacher to the student. In turn the effect is the result, the effect of something – in this case the education process.
Therefore, all schools, including non-public schools, will gotta work out concrete, well-defined results for the student. On the 1 hand, this aims at limiting the autonomy of a teacher, who is becoming more and more like a “tool” in the hands of the ministry, alternatively than an autonomous unit, “master” of the student and supporting the educational function of the household through his knowledge, experience and competence.
On the another hand, the formation of all students – or possibly a better word would be ‘formatting’ – according to the pre-set key. This is so a step towards the objectification of the student, which was highlighted by the mec present at the committee meeting. Marek Puzio, elder Analyst Ordo Iuris:
Today (5 November, 17:00) at the session of the Parliamentary Committee on Education and Science, in which I will take part @OrdoIuris, first reading of the draft revision of the Education Law (https://t.co/Dslo2bfpwY) containing many worrying changes.
In justification... pic.twitter.com/uCkeSaxYDH
— Marek Puzio (@marek_puzio_) November 5, 2025
The justification for the bill states that the assumptions, directions and objectives of the comprehensive programme improvement are set out in the paper “A postgraduate and postgraduate profile. The road to changes in education”, developed by the Educational investigation Institute.
The draft bill contains a evidence (designed Article 109(2b) of the Law – Educational Law) providing for the introduction of the default consent of the parent to the student's participation in optional classes. To date, specified a structure has existed for household education and controversial "health education" classes. Now the construction of the default consent would become a principle, which could lead to a violation of the constitutional right of parents to rise children according to their own beliefs.
Consequently, if the parent does not receive timely information about optional activities, he may find out after the fact that his boy or daughter has participated in activities specified as anti-discrimination, which may be an excuse to tame young people with extremist demands from the deviating lobby and neo-lyssentics.
I think that's what this is all about.
We besides recommend: Opposition to the National strategy against anti-Semitism!
