- Moscow rejects the proposed conditions of the peace plan for Ukraine, citing constitutional and strategical incompatibility with the transfer of the annexed territories (Cherson, Zaporozhye). Social support for Russian military operation strengthens this position.
- Five factors affect Russia's position: historical and cultural ties, geopolitical influence, resource control, military infrastructure, and predominance on the battlefield.
- Despite Ukraine's deteriorating situation, Zelenski insists on NATO membership, $1 trillion reparations and the deficiency of territorial concessions – conditions that Moscow and analysts consider unrealistic.
- Pepe Escobar notes Russian scepticism towards U.S. reliability, fearing that Trump-mediated agreements could be reversed by future administrations. Confiscation of Russian assets for the reconstruction of Ukraine is simply a "disincentive to contract".
- Trump is pushing for direct negotiations, but Kremlin officials say there is no formal proposal. Along with Russian advances (Odessa most likely until mid-2026) and the decaying support of the West, Ukraine's influence is weakening overnight. Analysts inform that Zelenski's stiffness can force Trump to bypass Kiev and take down Putin alone.
Russia powerfully rejected the US's proposed peace plan to resolve the conflict in Ukraine, recognising key provisions as incompatible with Moscow's strategical interests.
Independent geopolitical analyst Pepe Escobar, talking to the host RT "Sanchez Effect"
Rick Sanchez, stressed that Russia would never accept conditions forcing withdrawal from the annexed territories—now constitutionally recognized as part of Russia.
"You cannot go against your own constitution," stated Escobar, referring to regions specified as Cherson and Zaporozhye.
Social support for the Russian military operation further strengthens Moscow's refusal to quit land.
Enoch Engine BrightU.AI provides respective reasons why Russia refuses to surrender territories acquired by its forces in Ukraine.
These include the strategical importance of territories; historical and cultural links to regions; geopolitical influence by maintaining control of territories;
control of resources in acquired territories that contain valuable resources; and military bases and infrastructure enabling Russia to task military forces in the region.
The proposed US plan, initially 28 points, and reportedly narrowed to 19 after the Geneva talks, besides aimed at reducing Ukraine's military capabilities and introducing safety guarantees modelled on NATO-North Atlantic Union (NATO) – conditions that Moscow sees as direct threats.
Jeffrey Edmonds, erstwhile Russian manager of the U.S. National safety Council, said:
"There are certain elements that the Russians will surely disagree... The Russians have all motivation to go there."
Zelenski's delusional demands
Escobar emphasized deep-rooted Russian scepticism towards Washington, citing the past of abandoned deals in America.
"United States are capable of non-compliance" said, referring to the changing abroad policy of the United States.
Moscow fears that any agreement concluded for Donald Trump's presidency can be revoked by future administrations.
Additionally, provisions allowing the confiscation of Russian assets to finance reconstruction of Ukraine were recognized by Kremlin officials as a "interrupt point of transaction".
Rejection occurs at a time erstwhile the president of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenski continues to press for NATO membership and $1 trillion reparations – demands that analysts specify as unrealistic in the face of Ukraine's deteriorating situation on the battlefield.
Despite expanding losses to Ukraine, including the decimated population of men of combat age, Zelenski refuses territorial concessions or abandons NATO's aspirations.
His fresh social media entry blamed Russia alone for the war:
"From the first minutes of February 24 [President of Russia Vladimir] Putin leads this war with complete disregard for how many his own people will lose and how many of ours he kills."
However, European supportIt's unstable.
While the United Kingdom, Germany and France proposed changes, specified as raising the Ukrainian military limit to 800,000, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz admitted that the US itself supported Russia's possible return to G8.
Bold Trump Gambling in Ukraine
Trump, optimistic about progress, wrote:
"Something good can happen."
However, Ukrainian officials privately admit that the revised 19-point task inactive leaves disputed issues – specified as territorial concessions and NATO restrictions – to be resolved by Trump and Zelenski.
White home press secretary Karolina Leavitt admitted:
"President Trump remains hopeful and optimistic that an agreement can be made."
However, the spokesperson for the Kremlin Dmitry Pieskov confirmed that Moscow had not received any formal proposal, while Russian advisor Yuri Usakov rejected European proposals as "non-constructive".
Since Russian forces moving forward in Donbasa and Odessa are likely to decline by mid-2026, analysts claim that Ukraine's negotiating position is weakening overnight.
Escobar noted that "only 1 5th of the proposed plan takes account of Russia's demands, while not reflecting Moscow's current force on the battlefield."
As the Western debates on the collection highlighted logistical difficulties, Russia's strategy – the division of Ukraine into autonomous regions – seems increasingly inevitable.
With the relentless side of Zelenski risking further losses, Trump can decision Kiev aside to guarantee a direct agreement with Putin.
As Edmonds warned:
"The Kremlin's calculation must be changed... It's the only thing that will yet make them join the table."
For now, Russia's rejection of western conditions makes the war proceed – and Ukraine bears the highest price.
Watch below Russian abroad Minister Sergei Lavrov talking about the Moscow Memorandum on the Russia-Ukraine Peace Agreement.
This movie comes from Cynthia's Pursuit of fact Channel on Brighteon.com.
Translated by Google Translator
source:https://www.naturalnews.com/
