If the mafias called states want to execution each another in their unfettered foolishness, then all you can do is twist your head over their perverse urges. If they intend to bribe possible mercenaries in preparation for this common execution in bulk and richly, then 1 can only feel sympathy for the second deficiency of better prospects.
However, if they begin to usage the slimy, sophistic language of “voluntary universality” in this context, then it is essential to make it clear to them that the times of bold buying another people's lives, wellness and freedom have ended in a given part of the planet erstwhile and for all, and all hypocritical effort to get the public utilized to changing this state of affairs will only make the reaction of society to those who make specified attempts always greater.
* * Oh, * *
The difference between modern cinema and modern politics is that the first 1 offers performances so mediocre that almost no 1 pays attention to them anymore, while the second offers performances so mediocre that almost everyone pays attention to them. In another words, the erstwhile is already completely incapable of creating stunning fiction, while the second is already completely incapable to hide the sobering truth.
* * Oh, * *
What is the common ideological denominator of the Davos cliques and the bark of Silicon Valley, the depopular environmentalists and the promiscuistic techno-oligarchs, the Scientist "social engineers" and the newage's "golden age" herrols, the neo-Marxist misanthropists and the hurraoptimist apostles of "evangelia of prosperity" and the pan-European followers of "global brotherhood" and Washington or Beijing spokesmen of nationalistic populism and "a geopolitical reality"?
It is simply a belief in "digital consciousness", "technological identity", "transhumanism" and akin phenomena focusing on the central point of the fantastic-scientific self-pleasure of man, or the creation of a "earthly paradise" in cooperation with an anticipated algorithmic idol. Therefore, no substance what current shufflings take place on the grand theatre phase called "global politics", especially present – in the era of the eventual wilting of all utopian visions and ideological insanity – 1 should be peculiarly careful of the latter, the consensus-fetched ideological-visive lure, to which even the most light preachers of the "end of history" seem to cling in 1 degree or another.
This lure is nothing another than a technocratic-postmodern replica of the most eternal imagination of human self-poverty, that is, “eating fruit from the tree of knowledge” or building a tower of Babel reaching up to the heavens—a imagination that, if taken seriously enough, actually ends all time “the end of history.” Therefore, since all seemingly conflicted "powers and powers" repress more or little the beginning of this 1 goal as a "strategic priority" or at least a captivating tune of the future, maintaining a far-reaching distance towards it seems to be the minimum common sense essential to not end up with a "mixed language" or much worse harm to the body, soul and understanding.
This would be a final step in not perpetuating any form of siren singing cultivated by home “world rulers” – and thus a final step on the way to the education of interior freedom in itself, which allows reliably to separate what is possible, and thus possibly good, from what is impossible, and so necessarily devastatingly bad, if it is convinced to scope it.
* * Oh, * *
"Vocism" is simply a diabolical inversion of Christianity (requesting others to repent and to make amends for their own wrongs, promoting all distortions as a mocking parody of the principles "the last will be the first and the last" etc.), while "MAGA-ism" is simply a completely desecrated paganism (trium triumphism, kitsch abuse, tromtadratic buffonada and shamanist technocracy from the flag of "digital reindustrialisation").
What is crucial is that these 2 seemingly conflicted phenomena present themselves in the above manner for mass use, due to the fact that in their "elitarian" version, both are gnostic-ocultistic: "vocism" is the pursuit of self-affiliation expressed in the desire to overthrow the nonsubjective order of reality, while "MAGA-ism" is the pursuit of self-affluence expressed in the desire to dominate the nonsubjective order of reality.
The former, as the culmination of the anti-civilization revolution, paved the way for the latter, which is the culmination of the accivizable counter-revolution no longer paving the way for anything. Hence, it is hard to get a better "negative" determinant of appropriate conduct than a careful adherence to all the breathable phenomena, either Scylla "vocism", or Charibda "MAGA-ism" (in all its local variations).
This, in turn, may be the key to uncovering the “positive” determinant of appropriate conduct, and hence not only to abandon the astray, but besides to entering the way leading to the fact and even to the Way leading to the Truth. After all, the easiest way to find wheat is erstwhile – in contrast – all species of tartling grow around with a peculiar abundance. This remains to be wished by all who express their sincere desire to get out of the tares' thicket, thus gaining the kind of freedom that no 1 can take from them anymore.
* * Oh, * *
The more oppressive humanity is the choice between tacky and grotesque, narcissism and masochism and self-loathing, the more diligent it is to hold on to faith, hope and love, or to all that full exposes the absurdity of akin “alternates.”
* * Oh, * *
The “scientific” psychopaths pave the way for the “revolutionary” psychopaths, the “revolutionary” psychopaths pave the way for the “reformist” psychopaths, the “reformist” psychopaths pave the way for the nihilist psychopaths, and the nihilist psychopaths pave the way for the cabotine psychopaths. The remainder is silence.
Jakub Bożydar Wiśniewski
