Regardless of the drama of Venezuela, it is hard not to grin at how ideological opponents of Donald Trump in the EU and III of Poland praise his action, utilizing the language of the erstwhile stage, i.e. the dominance of liberal explanation of global relations, while the action of Americans is simply a model example of the implementation of geopolitical realism.
Of course, a akin phraseology to liberals can inactive be utilized by the neo-Kono State Department of the U.S., but POTUS has already moved on with his arms, well aware that the answer to the question why he attacked Venezuela is same as with Vladimir Putin Ukraine: he attacked, Because he could.
Rules governing this world
In turn, declaring their unchanging support for the US, PiS activists seem to be deluded that in a planet one more time openly divided into "our" and "non-our" sons of bitches they will be our "ours". The point is that they would gotta change their message at least, and preferably their full attitude on Ukraine, but they are as anachronistic as the government and the EU.
Of course, let us besides overlook the fewer oppositions resulting from the acceptance of so much noble as the fewer that bring discord to the strength and meaning of global relations. It is worth reminding those who object to the old image Andrzej Mleczko with shaking under the table and comment: “Mr Kazio has just understood the rules governing this world”. Moral opposition is sometimes a good propaganda method, but usually small more, especially if it is honest. In this context, Trump's action is simply a reminder of the contractuality and much of the PR meaning of alleged global law, as well as proof of how ridiculous and hypocritical the evidence of the notorious Article 117 §3 of the Criminal Code is, on the grounds of hypocrisy, penalising "public praise for starting an assault war". Well, unless almost the full political class of the 3rd Republic of Poland is now willing to submit voluntarily to imprisonment from 3 months to 5 years.
There's no mob!
But let us leave all these fables, as mentioned, from the erstwhile era of pretending that global relations are not what they are, that is, a violent game of strength and interests. Trump's action is of course a negative event, but not for any formal reason, but due to the fact that it is... Trump's action, an American action calculated to hold the decline of dominance and regain the U.S. position at strategical points in the globe. The forces operating through POTUS usage his reconnaissance sign, that is, the desire to show that he is successful (?) where the predecessors failed, which may indeed be an crucial hint for Washington's next steps. The attack on Venezuela, and the earlier Christmas bombing of Nigeria and the riots in Iran, rightly besides have asked whether the states who aspire to independency from the United States are capable of self-defense and how willing they are to cooperate.
Of course, in any cases, the velocity and effectiveness of American action so far has caused uncontrollable joy, in the spirit of “But Putin and XiThey did! And where is your Axis of Evil?!” On the another hand, there was just as much grief, with the conviction that if NicolásMaduro, as well as the leaders of Russia and China have read the X-profiles of our colleagues is long ago, ho, ho! would have been swept up. Only that in a gag about a chicken who wanted to join the mafia – the full problem is that no “Ax Evil” or (as others dream) the large Anti-globalist Alliance simply... They don't exist.
Multipolar instability
It comes down to confusing concepts. Many people wrongly identify multipolarity with biblocking, but these are completely different concepts and states of global relations. Countries with possible in view of the end of American hegemony are curious in strengthening their own position in the regional dimension or in the impact zones, not in building permanent alliances, and this is completely natural. Historically, neither Britain nor Russia, let alone China, built any coalitions another than task forces. The talk of the best alliance with its own army and fleet dates back to specified times: geopolitical realism and the performance of powers.
Does this mean, then, that the U.S. is able to get to countries that are self-reliant, subjecting them again 1 by one, and cutting down candidates for regional powers? And yes and no. The states can disintegrate BRICS, e.g. excluding from it this year Brazil, as a consequence of the presidential election, can begin the reconquist of Africa, not necessarily sharing it with the UK and France, may effort to take over Cuba (again: even Kennedy failed – and Trump would have succeeded!), and of course hit Iran, which would have culminated in Trump's imagination – the Zionist's top Friend. However, even the Americans will not have adequate strength on all of them, and a series of subsequent conflicts would not be little costly than a clash with an integrated coalition. And at the end of the day, there is inactive a match with China, which, even by losing cooperators, will inactive be America's No. 1 rival.
It is besides actual that the applicable dimension of multipolarity dispersed (and there is another one?) can actually mean permanent instability, but it was akin to / it is with American monopolarity – since 1990 no 1 could be certain of a day or an hour, even if he did not control oil deposits and thought for a long time that he was our boy of a bitch, or was late promoted to specified a. Historically, this bipolar arrangement was the geopolitically most unchangeable despite, or possibly due to conflicts on the outskirts. The point is that today, the centre of specified a non-American block could only be China and paradoxically, but any American outburst, for example, threatening the supply of energy resources, is simply a signal for Beijing primarily to bring Russia closer together, and any impact on Chinese credit and investment areas is an argument for Chinese-European cooperation and further diversification of markets.
The axis of evil does not exist, which does not mean that Donald Trump cannot make it.
Konrad Hand
