Tenth term... But it does, doesn't it? The erstwhile 1 with specified numbering was, let's callback the 1 called contract, ending the past of PRL. And here, the sash-prast and Parliamentarianism of the 3rd Republic of Poland has earned its own pseudo jubilee (because for years it comes out somewhat differently).
Transnational governance
Nor does it seem that the 3rd Republic, despite the permanent economical crisis and political infertility, is someway more inclined than usual to decline, although mostly in the full planet the appearance of liberal democracy is already slow hidden into cabinets with unnecessary decorations, and power is increasingly in the hands of the global technocratic layer, closely linked to global capital. Poland is no longer in Warsaw. and it is not even about the apparent submission of the American hegemony, but besides about the non-alternative transfer of political leadership to centres that do not undergo any national control, i.e. any ointment to councils, commissions and forums, from European Union bodies to the planet Health, Trade and All-Efficiency Organizations.
No drink
Leaving national policy alone almost allied-polarization maneuvers thus plays a function akin to serving peanuts during flight – it takes the attention of those who, unwilling to want to be inside, as a minimum, to be careful not to throw up at least. Each subsequent election campaign, therefore, is more or little a repetition of the erstwhile one, even if roles have been replaced in the meantime, due to the fact that rituals stay unchanged, and participation and consequence in terms of causality are definitely losing to specified participation in the dance of rain. It would so seem that the right is on the side of the alienated alternatively than the polarized, i.e. it is more reasonable not to vote than to participate in all this. In fact, yes, in any case, with respect to large numbers and even bigger expectations, by themselves Democratic procedures at any level above respective 1000 municipalities make no sense. However, just as absurd is the belief that "You gotta vote for someone.In spite of everything else, Absenceism gives the act of vote an unnecessarily serious character.
Let's vote for friends, not parties.
Since party-media democracy has already unhappyly been imposed on us as a political form of Polish peripherality, we can inactive express our own views there somehow. I stress – the main drawback of organization tributaryism is frequently to renounce one's common sense for the benefit of top-down interests of the collective with the dubious mostly bonds of actual interests and common objectives. In simple terms: I've always insisted on voting on friends, people who admit honesty and reason adequate to stay sane even in the case of election success. Programmes, passwords and declarations are crucial insofar as they are authorized by specified individual experiences of decent people.
That is why, erstwhile asked mostly before the elections, who I vote for or who I support – I like to exchange names alternatively than signs. Especially due to the fact that organization democracy of the 3rd Republic of Poland is in addition as infantile as the remainder of the Polish policy, i.e. it insists on linking with the family, i.e. informing who is voted for can be identified with guessing who wins. Why a unique value would be to vote for individual who wins, and then will do something contrary to what I care about – I don't know, but I frequently encounter this attitude.
Nothing by force
The informing besides comes before a strong vote, "Because it is imperative that the Law and Justice be removed from power!“ which leads to any bizarre, and maintaining the pathology of the 3rd Polish breakers, specified as voting on the 3rd Road, etc. There is no specified coercion, and how disastrous the governments of the others were, we should remember. However, similarly, possible return Tuska besides will not mean any Finis Poloniae, so the vote with closed eyes and tight teeth There's no point in any way.
In Chelma: Confederate, but...
So briefly and on the subject – I do not give national advice and due to the fact that in the full country I do not vote, and late love for any committee I am not going to be mad. However, this does not mean that I do not have the typical problems of organization democracy erstwhile voting (I repeat: for people). For here I have a dilemma erstwhile voting in Chełma. Not with a referendum, the PiS itself digs with it, especially if it holds in power. The smallest 1 with the legislature – I will just take the card as a souvenir. However, to the Sejm...Ha, to the Sejm is from the Sejm there are 2 large candidates, with a very different letter, but I repeat: a man counts, not his band. VICTOR KASPRAK, No 3 on the list of Confederations and Marek Jaroshek, No. 2 on the Left's list should just be the messengers. They're honest, they're professional, they're honest, they do quite a few good for the Chelm Land. But... But the point is, by voting for them, we don't gotta choose them. I mean, I would like this to happen and I would give my vote without hesitation, to 1 of them, but the leaders of both mentioned letters, regardless of whether individual prefers a national-conservative right or a truly social left – do not warrant even simple respect for the expectations and hopes of voters.
This is simply a problem and not only in Chełma. Is it due to the fact that by casting votes on many honest candidates from the Confederate letter (mainly from the Team) Brauna, but besides fresh Hope, and even though much less, National Movement) – we do not make at the same time List of successive Deputy Fisheries Ministers Or something like that, no substance whose government? Hopefully not, but doubt, a very serious uncertainty should be taken into account: who and WHY will these voices yet serve? It is good to be young (not necessarily even an age), naive and inactive have much (new) hope to spend on credit. However, this will be the Tenth Session. So it would be time to get a small smarter and learn something.
Lublin: Poland There is 1 and independent candidate for the Senate
Are my friends, household and friends in Lublin easier? Technically, yes. They have as many as 2 excellent candidates for the Senate: Prof. Mr Piotrovski ed MARCINA NEWA. The voice on any of them will not be wasted, although it must be admitted that prof. Piotrowski speaks much more sensiblely and at all is more active since he does not execute any function by choice, so possibly it would be a pity to conviction him to legislature inactivity again, how akin to the erstwhile European associate State? In any case, I would have voted for Nowak, due to the fact that he does not service this way erstwhile he is not elected, and on the City Council, which he is Vice-President, he is clearly already tight, while helping average people Marcin just likes.
The Confederate in Lublin besides tried this time, and fighting for 2 tickets – he besides has a good tandem: the leader of the list, Bartholomew Pejo and Prof. Mr Ryszard ZAJCZKOWSKINo. 3 for the Confederation of the Polish Crown. And yet, if I had voted in Lublin, I would have voted for individual else. Without hesitation, I would have given my vote to The number 1 on the POLSKA list is one. due to the fact that I know her and respect her due to the fact that I know her Polish honest family, due to the fact that I know what a decent approach she has to life and business and how she has always behaved decently, even in times of trial, against various pressures or pandemic madness. And does her list, PJJ, have a chance? Let's vote, we'll see.
I already know who to vote for and most importantly, why and why. And you?
Konrad Hand
