The question is why women, society, politicians, the Church, do not want men to be so aware and e.g.:
- effectively defended themselves against stealing from a female from divorce and after divorce
- They didn't get into relationships with slutty girls.
- They claimed that a woman's sexual past was invalid
- They didn't take slutty women for wives.
- They did not want to rise their children - see: Polish movie “The Caretaker” of 2023 – that is, so that men do not be kukolds and do not rise another people's bastards
- were utilized by the state
- They tolerated disrespect for fatherhood
- They were not used, and they were not humble—in another words, not even slaves, for the slave may rebel.
Why? This is the following text:
On 29 February 2024, an article by Aleksandra Nowakowski, entitled “Red pill – what is the movement of opponents of feminism?” was published in the Ukrainian magazine ( judging by the flag by the logo on the website).
There is already a bad luck in the title: a RED PILL – a red pill – is simply a movement of conscious men who do not want to be losers utilized by women, society or the state, for example by giving their lives in another people's wars.
For all authority, men are of small importance, especially after reaching retirement age. Men are to work, fight and not complain. And erstwhile they're old, they can die. Well, complaining is not manly, due to the fact that men endure the hardship of surviving in silence and humility. Man! Shut your mouth and pay your taxes!
It's besides good if you're raising another children. That is why genetic investigating for paternity is prohibited in France, among others.
Aleksandra Nowakowska in this “Zwiedle”, in his own, I am sorry to compose this, but the intellectually limited article, writes:
"Move red pill calls for men to take a metaphorical red pill to wake up and see that in the planet men, not women, are discriminated against, ignored, oppressed. The rights of men according to them are neglected. Redpillowists feel that men and women disagree in terms of evolution and should so be subject to sexual roles. The worldview of red pill is on the 1 hand calling for a conventional narrative, saying that a woman's place is at home, with children and pots, and a man at work to support his family. On the another hand, the institution of matrimony is ridiculed and ridiculed. The common denominator of the content popularized by the editors is that they preach that women are little mild and "angelic" than is widely believed and than both sexes want to see them".
Hyperglycaemia
“The Red Pill advocates presume that women always – due to the fact that that is their nature – strive to connect with a man whose sexual marketplace value is as advanced as possible – is their concept of Sexual marketplace Value” - adds A. Nowakowska.
And as we can see, in a supposedly psychological, professional magazine, there is simply a text separated from the author's reality, questioning technological research, reality and the laws governing this world.
One net user wrote in a comment on a page:
"Since erstwhile is red pill directed against women?
Unless healthy care for your needs and not being someone's push or an ATM in an unequal relation is okay in the woman's business."
All men who discover and talk about social illusions, which many boys and men are drawn upon, are called enemies of feminism and women, misogynists, dolls in tubes that request to be taken into the military to make them wise, etc. – that is, they should be made slaves and shamed all step of them (or this broken strategy may collapse).
We live in a large deception and a time to advance scum. Psychology has long relativized the notion of "good and evil". It does not take into account universal standards, claiming that this is due to objectivity and technological reliability by failing to measure circumstantial behaviour.
Meanwhile, ethical neutrality is simply a de facto acceptance (promotion?) of lies and all deviant behaviors, for which the "scientist" will always find any "logical" explanation.
Honestly? Watch out for most psychologists! They are liars and constipators, specified couchs (coach trainer, but in English, it sounds so wonderful among compplexed Poles), having its "wiseness" for everything. specified modern fairies.
Women initiate most divorces
"The data shows that women initiate around 70% of divorces in heterosexual marriages, as confirmed in investigation conducted by Michael Rosenfeld, a sociologist at Stanford University who analyzed data from 2009-2015. Rosenfeld stated that women are more likely to initiate divorces, but this trend does not translate into ending informal relationships.”
Source: ]]>https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-third-wave/201705/who-initia...]]>
The same happens in Poland, where women initiate 2/3 divorces.
Source: ]]>https://legal-family.com.pl/statistics-related-divorce-in-polska/]]>
Of course, erstwhile a female takes a man's kid distant to be raised by another man through beating and pathological intercourse (a proverbial "concubine-killer"), the man is to stay silent and not be allowed to fight due to the fact that by feminists, psychologists, ministers and another witches, he will be called misogynist, incelem, etc.
When a court imposes for advanced alimony, leading a man to bankruptcy – due to the fact that in Poland, there is no specified thing as Germany, a fork that defines statutory alimony rates), the man is misogynist.
In addition, another studies carried out in the United States propose that women are little inclined to tolerate unsatisfactory marriages and may feel more limited by the institution of marriage. Women besides frequently do much of the emotional work in a relation and may be little inclined to tolerate “bad behavior”. In turn men may be more reluctant to initiate divorce for fear of social stigmatisation
Source: ]]>https://www.divorceutah.com/2020/07/01/who-initiates-divorce-more-often-...]]>
The Catholic Church is besides curious in making men easy exploit their cukolds – any fetishists who derive satisfaction from their use.
"Men always cheat." And erstwhile they cheat on women, men are besides guilty that they supposedly deficiency manhood, concern, interest in women (e.g. erstwhile working 12 hours per family) and specified nonsense.
I erstwhile wrote a text about this, about the disgusting (sorry, but that was the truth) statements of the popular priest Dominic Chmielewski, who (I checked present and the movie is removed) justifying a lousy betrayal of a woman. This message is the summit of being a kukold, a simp, and a spokesman. That message was just as lousy as that woman's behavior.
John, for that is the name of my friend, widely known in many circles, wrote:
That is why I believe that the Church must fall. You're trying to force women into 4 letters. That's not the way. The church has no offer for men but sacrifice. If you don't teach women responsibility, the Church will vanish in this generation. Look who's coming to your mass. All retired. Men want to teach weakness and submission to all women. This never ends well. A female loses respect for a man and betrays, then goes to another stronger man and doesn't care about her matrimony vows. And then you wonder why so many divorces, why less and less people come to mass. If you proceed to take work for their actions from women and turn her into men, the church will disappear. And you will be replaced by Islam. And you will be responsible.
Not only the Church, but besides the State (not only Poland). For example, the "house for slander" bill is an exaggeration. Women exchange notes on how to trick a partner into living.
Hypergamy 2
Hypergamy is nothing more than a proverbial "flight for money". And that's not surprising. Women desire men of higher social position and pay. They say they have even stronger orgasms.
Hypergamy is simply a word utilized in social sciences describing the practice of having relationships or marriages with partners with higher social status. This is mainly observed among women. The word comes from India, in which hypergamy refers to practices in caste society, where women from higher caste marry men of an even higher status. investigation shows that women around the planet like partners with higher socio-economic status.
Source: ]]>https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hipergamia]]>
Well, if a man talks about this phenomenon that occurs among people around the planet (among animals too), he is simply a fascist, misogynist, incelem, etc.
Dr. Małgorzata Stefanowicz, expert on social affairs of the Jagiellonian Club Analysis Centre, informs that 99% of women in Poland do not want a partner with lower social status.
Source: ]]>https://klubjagiellonski.pl/2018/07/13/stefanowicz-women-no-wanca-part...]]>
Answering the question asked at the beginning of the text: knowledge, information = strength. There's nothing better for the economy than a struggling man. However, in the absence of a woman, erstwhile a man understands – he will gain cognition – that he must stay alone for the remainder of his life (because all the women available to him are fat, old, totally stupid/sucking or ugly), alternatively of working hard after 12 hours he will work 8 hours and be satisfied due to the fact that he will not worry about taking his princess' home on debt and giving her food to the family.
But what the system, politics, women, power, the Church, society, are most afraid of is the knowing by men of the principles of seduction or, more broadly, of male-female relations. You don't gotta get married, be sweet, be honest “trying”, buy flowers to sexually overpower a woman. On the contrary. Goodness, devotion, and individual culture are a disadvantage in many women's eyes (at least erstwhile it comes to casual sex, due to the fact that then, they like bastards, naughty boys). And that's what it truly is about erstwhile it comes to hating RED PILL.
It is said that RED PILL is simply a healthy consequence to feminism. No, it's something much bigger, bigger and more important. It's knowing the planet as it is, not as others want you to think.
A You, which pill do you prefer?
