The alleged Epstein affair is not a substitute subject. This is simply a evidence of an era in which power, money and fame is gained through participation – passive or active – in pedophilia, sexual crimes, human trafficking.
His victims' evidence besides mentions satanic practices and cannibalism. The papers of the scandal are a grim evidence to the fall of the moral West, which under the leadership of the United States sought, as part of global westernization, to impose a deficiency of moral norms on all mankind. Epstein is the face of the dechristianized, demoralized and yet dehumanized collective West of the past decades. Dehumanized, for rejecting all moral norms is simply a step down in the hierarchy of existences, a breach that does not refine, not perfect, does not strengthen spiritually. It's the way to animalization. The practices documented by Epstein's criminal group show that it deliberately provoked and allowed its prominent guests and customers from the planet of politics, business, science, culture, art to exceed moral standards. – It is crucial that there are no grey citizens among them who have no contact with the large world. – All to influence their further improvement – on the 1 hand, and on the another hand, to impose the rejection of the moral standards of the grey mass of its societies and thus to regulation over them. Demoralization has been included in the program of the cultural revolution as its most crucial point, changing profoundly Western civilization.
Epstein's documentation of his activities was aimed at fabricating the compromises on the influential people associated with him and deliberately blackmailing them in achieving various goals – from purely political to civilization-cultural.
At this point the question arises: Who defined these goals and through whom? Partial consequence is contained in already published papers indicating peculiar services, among which Mossad is mentioned. For political scientists and sociologists, the question is equally important: did another services – above all, American – not know about Epstein's criminal activities? CIA and FBI? If the United States services did not know, then we are faced with a spectacular evidence of the weakness of the American state. If they knew and knew this, we are dealing with a conscious participation of these services in weakening the US. However, for the investigator of anthropological and civilisational-cultural issues, it is crucial in Epstein's documentation that the evidence of exceeding moral norms and related all another axiological standards as a way of being elites is important. As a Modern Amoral modus vivendi All over the West, promoted under the patronage of its leaders not only in politics – through leading ideologies – but above all in culture, science, education.
No more elites.
The mechanics revealed in Epstein's files of creating power in these spheres through the network – on the 1 hand cognition and various forms of influence, on the another hand – through blackmail and compromate – did not be alone. He was closely linked to the criminal activity mechanics of this criminal. Conducting the process of gaining or maintaining power in close connection with exceeding moral standards – from crime to crime – is nothing new. Especially erstwhile their crossing is embedded in the ideological foundation of Western civilization-cultural transformations.
This case is Epstein's file. It cannot be considered purely political and legal. Its anthropological dimension is much more crucial – visible at the level of civilization and culture. Millions of pages of this documentation are a collision of modern recording technologies with Western moral decline at this phase of the cultural revolution – the dehumanization of humanity. The elite played a leading function in this process. Their leaders in the sphere of politics, business, science, culture have amoral faces in the documentation – they usage the services of criminals to dive into fornication, make a career, plunge competition, receive money for secret discipline programs, etc.
Some have only utilized Epstein's powers in peculiar services and contacts with decision-makers to accomplish an nonsubjective impossible under applicable law – through a conspiracy that appears in revealed acts in various forms. His most outstanding example was the demolition – with the aid of Epstein – of Pope Francis. He offered them to this criminal. Steve Bannon, close associate Donald Trump from the first election run and co-founder of MAGA. ‘We will destruct (Pope) Francis” – wrote Bannon to Epstein in June 2019, describing the saint's father at the time as a “disdainable person” and urging the Italian right-wing leader to attack her Matteo Salvini [and].
The same material (www.polsatnews.pl/2026002-14) quotes the correct assessment of Bannon's cooperation with Epstein on the head of the Catholic Church, presented by the Vaticanist. It can be considered to be 1 of the main objectives of the criminal activity of the loudest American vip-suiter: “Priest Antonio Spadaro, a Vatican authoritative and close associate of Pope Francis, told CNN that Bannon's behaviour demonstrates his desire to combine “spiritual power with political power to accomplish strategical goals.” This is not only about power over the Vatican, but besides about power over the full world. Still, unfortunately, we're not certain who the power is. From a civilization-cultural point of view, the most crucial of these 2 kinds of power is the 1 that concerns the spirit. If specified a government of souls in American – interred by a criminal – were a plan to revive spiritual and moral humanity, it could be a form of justification for Trump's man.
It turned out, however, that in this form of anti-Vatican conspiracy only about political victories of his organization to the leading American Conservative. Moreover, neither Bannon nor any typical of the U.S. elite has any intention of squatting in front of their people, apologizing for dealing with a criminal, demanding the punishment of his associates. Only honest, mediocre people are shocked, over whom disgraced elites proceed to regulation and show their untouchable immorality with Satan's pride. Epstein's materials let us to formulate the thesis that these elites have become – paradoxically – an avant-garde of the fall of the West, already begun in the first phase of the 1968 cultural revolution.
Nihil novi sub salts
Morality as a fundamental rule of the European revolution was read brilliantly as early as the 19th century Fyodor Dostoevsky In Biesach (1872). The author showed the revolutionary thought as a product of Western civilization, which absorbed the minds of the Russian intelligence of that time and pushed it to the road not only politics and culture, but besides anthropology and axiology. Piotr Wierchowiński, the host of this idea, presented in the novel, speaks openly about what the coup in Russia will consist of: chaos and omnipotent moral corruption. This 19th century Russian supporter of the Western thought is simply a literary archetype of all later revolutionaries. Dostoyevsky as no 1 else could capture the essence of their mentality: the insane fascination of evil. They're starting large revolutions to get drunk by their destructive force.
"First of all, we will spread confusion, as Wierchowinski exclaims in amok. We'll infiltrate the people. Do you know we're so strong now? Our people – not just those who fuck and burn, not just those who shoot or bite. (...) The teacher who mocks their God and their cradle with his children is ours. A lawyer who defends an educated killer, citing that the latter, standing higher intellectually than the victim, had to kill due to the fact that he needed money – besides ours. The crooks who kill the man to learn the impressions of the killer are ours. Juries who acquitted criminals – ours. A prosecutor who trembles before the court, whether or not he will be accused of not liberalism – ours, ours. Administrators, literates, oh, ours are a lot, an awful lot, although they themselves do not know it” [ii].
The shown revolutionary is drunk by a peculiar form of full moral demolition – fornication. “Now,” tempts Stavrogin, the spiritual teacher of the title bies, is essential for 2 generations of fornication. Unheard of fornication, the meanest thing that makes a man filthy, cowardly, cruel, selfish being. It's necessary. And you request fresh blood to get utilized to” [iii]. This image of the revolution closes the installment which is ridicule not only for good and justice, but besides for truth. The most immoral character of the novel, Stavrogyn, is to be at the head of the coup. For the people to believe him and follow him, revolutionaries will spread the rumor that he is simply a miraculously appearing Ivan Carevic – a mythical hero of Russian fairy tales, doing heroic deeds in the name of large good.
Presented 154 years ago in the fresh of the Russian author antidecalog of revolutionary consciousness as its anti-Christian determinant – appears in the 21st century as the current ideological and axiological foundation of the cultural revolution. He has only undergone improvement and a kind of "improvement" on the basis of civilizational improvement and technological and technological progress. Promoted in culture since the Renaissance, crossing Christian moral standards has been a constant impulse for revolutionary thinking. The way of this promotion of immorality is easy to recreate, reaching to the past of European literature – Russian, fortunately it had no crucial part in this case.
From Decameron to J. Epstein
The subject of exceeding moral standards in a certain age has been a constant planet literature since its inception. In Western culture, it becomes peculiarly crucial erstwhile it becomes a program component of civilizational transformation. This was the case with Decamerona Giovanni Boccaccio – a collection of the 100th fresh created in the mid-14th century, placed in the Index of Forbidden Books in 1559.(Librorum prohibitorum index). Why? Since these tales of 10 "nobility" of Florence's inhabitants (women and masters) – protecting themselves from plague in the countryside – contain erotic threads constituting taboos in the mediate Ages, including sensual extramarital love. The “noble births”, thus killing the boredom of quarantine, uncover at the same time the darkness of their morality.
Otherwise, they would not have learned specified stories, due to the fact that they know about the existence of red lines in the moral code in force then, they are aware of sin and mischief. This consciousness has above all Boccaccio, who invented for his narrators a quarantine that isolates them from people. However, the first step in moving distant from the moral standards has already been made. Decamerone hailed as a trailer of a fresh era – a Renaissance, which made the maxim of the Roman playwright Teretius “Man I am and nothing human is abroad to me” a timeless slogan. Unfortunately, that's what opened the cultural can of Pandora. It became the origin of the degrengolade of Renaissance humanism, which began a long past of tolerance for various erotic and sexual perversions of man, thus condemning him to moral chaos and returning in this respect to the Gentile era.
Another detonation from that can was creativity. Donatiena A. F. de Sade, appearing in the past of culture as the Marquis de Sade. This scandalist, criminal, revolutionary, philosopher of libertinism, and above all the author of the second half of the 18th and early 19th centuries epatious in his work with sexual crimes, which he associated with cruelty—the name of sadism derived from him. The most typical of his views are 2 positions: 1 100 and 20 days of Sodom, or the school of libertinism and Justyna, or the misfortune of virtue – which are a kind of catalogue of sexual perversions and simultaneously the credo of amoralism, which boils down to the negation of God, morality and all higher values.
His literary works and libertian doctrine can be described as a common denominator: in the service of the revolution. Above all, French 1789, which showed not only its amoral but besides anti-Christian face. Marquis de Sade himself took a direct part as secretary Maximilian Robespierre. His work played a much greater function in this field: it shaped an amoral mentality without which the thought of revolution would not have found its fulfillment.
What's Epstein's connection to Marquis de Sade? A lot: they were both scandalists, criminals, criminals. Both contributed to the triumph of the revolution of their times by perpetuating or even imposing amoralism as the foundation of revolutionary changes in Western civilization. They only disagree in the form of a evidence of demoralizing activity. The French author uses literary forms. The American vip-sutener, referred to as a euphemist financier, left a "raw" record, above all electronic, constituting a factual material for possible various literary shots. In addition, he utilized codes that Marquis did not even think of to hide his criminal activities.
Epstein's affair and its documentation is simply a turning point in Western civilization. It is crucial who and how will decide his future in this dimension. Modern Western politics, as well as culture, science, education determined the concept of alleged repressive tolerance, which is simply a de facto form of absolute combating all right and all conservatism. Only these can request the disclosure of all aspects of the scandal and the punishment of all the partners of its organizer, above all secret clients. Protecting them will be invented – including for specified situations – by a German-American philosopher and sociologist of judaic origin – Herbert Marcuse This repressive tolerance.
This Marxist of the Frankfurt School – mainly the Western-European period – of the 1968 revolution guru, is inactive regarded as the ideologist of the fresh left, which patronises the current phase of the cultural revolution, imposing amoralism on modern man and shaping his anti-Christian mentality. The designation of Marcuse's essay Repressive Tolerance (1965) by the ideologists of the ongoing revolution as the fundamental point of their political and social agenda gives them circumstantial immunity from work – including legal ones – for dehumanizing activities in the sphere of civilization and culture. Marcuse wrote his “repressive” manifesto with a view to defending or even favoring specified activities.
"A liberating tolerance (repressive tolerance)," he wrote, would so mean intolerance to the right and tolerance to left-wing movements. As regards the degree of this tolerance and intolerance, it would gotta extend to both action and discussion and propaganda, to words and actions... Absence of tolerance to reactionary movements before they become active, intolerance besides directed against thinking, views and words (mainly intolerance to conservatives and the political right)” [iv].
Unfortunately, enslaved by the false story of America, the conservative right does not yet find adequate courage either in the USA or in Europe, and even more so in pro-American Poland, to take up the fight against the elite, which operated in various spheres of our reality under the influence of Epstein and his secret promoters. Therefore, we are inactive stuck in a poisonous mixture of civilizations – disappearing Christian and anti-Christian dominant over it.
Prof. Anna Raźny
[i] https://www.polsatnews.pkl/message/2026-02-14/bannon-koresponddowal-z-epstein-obale-Pope-French/
[ii] F. Dostoevsky, Biesy, crowd. Z. Zagórski and Z. Podgórzec, PIW, Warszawa 1977, pp. 410-411.
[iii] Ibid. p. 411.
[iv] https://więcespoleczna.pl/tolerance-repressive-herbert-marcuse/
Think Poland, No. 9-10 (1-8.03.2026)
