A lifeguard stabbed. The court greatly softened the judgement – why is that possible?

The Szczecin territory Court ruled in a loud attack on a paramedic at a military hospital. 64-year-old Grzegorz M., who stabbed a public officer a year ago and threatened the staff, was sentenced to a full of 7 years and a period imprisonment. This decision raises many questions, especially since the attempted execution of a paramedic has been threatened by prison sentences for 15 years to life. The Court of First Instance applied an exceptional leniency, considering that even the lowest sanction provided for in the Criminal Code would be besides severe in this case. What precisely decided on specified a amazing decision, and what are the consequences for the safety of medical personnel in Poland?

Brutal Attack on SOR in Szczecin – Event Run

Dramatic events occurred 5 June 2024 at 109 Military infirmary at Piotr Skargi Street in Szczecin. Grzegorz M. was brought to the infirmary Emergency Unit (SOR) with head injury. The man was intoxicated and violent from the beginning. After stitching up the wound and informing about the request for a specialised head examination, the patient was fastened with safety belts to the bed due to his hostility and screaming.

Around 4:00 in the morning, the aggressor was released from his belt. He walked into the nurse's area and threatened her by holding a knife in his hand. He hit her with his hand on the head. The female fled to the next room, where a paramedic was located. Then Grzegorz M. stabbed a lifeguard in the chest. According to justice Michael Tomala, a press spokesperson for the Szczecin territory Court, the injuries were many and could have caused death, but immediate aid was given to the victim, which saved his life. After the attack, the attacker continued to endanger the staff, demanding release from the hospital. He was overpowered by a police patrol in the courtyard of the facility.

Judgment of the territory Court — circumstantial Penalties and Compensation

Last Tuesday, the Szczecin territory Court ruled in the 64-year-old case. Grzegorz M. had 3 charges filed: attempted execution of a paramedic, active assault on a nurse, and threats to a paramedic. To attempted execution of a paramedicThe court sentenced him to 7 years in prison. For an active assault on a nurse, the conviction of the year of imprisonment was pronounced, and for threatening the ward – 8 months.

Eventually, the court targeted Grzegorz M. a full punishment of 7 years and a period imprisonment. In addition, the suspect was obliged to pay the following payment: 10 1000 PLN for the lifeguard and 1 1000 zlotys for the nurse. The full punishment differs importantly from the punishment provided for in the Criminal Code for the attempted execution of a public officer who has been in prison for 15 years for life.

Why did the Court soften Kara? Key Reasons

The most amazing component of the judgement is the application by the court exceptional leniency. justice Tomala explained that the court found that even the lowest punishment provided for in the Criminal Code, or 15 years of imprisonment, would be besides severe in this peculiar case. respective key circumstances have been taken into account in the prosecution:

• Defendant He confessed to his actions.
• Gregory M. He's never been punished before., which is simply a crucial mitigating factor.
• The court besides considered Senior age of the accused (64 years).

Moreover, in determining the cumulative penalty, the court applied full absorption principle. This means that the actions committed by the 64-year-old were committed at the same place and time, allowing for a combination of penalties in a way that does not sum them straight and takes into account their simultaneousity.

Consequences of judgement and Further Steps – What Does It Mean?

Judgment of the Szczecin territory Court on Tuesday is not valid. Both the suspect and the prosecutor have the right to appeal this decision to the Szczecin Court of Appeal. justice Tomala confirmed that both Grzegorz M. and the prosecutor, who consistently demanded a harsher punishment – 15 years and a period imprisonment, which is much closer to the lower border for this kind of crime. The defendant, Grzegorz M., is inactive in temporary custody.

This case rekindles the discussion on safety of medical personnel and the effectiveness of legal protection for public officials. Although paramedics are subject to peculiar legal protection, decisions specified as those in Szczecin may rise concerns as to the adequacy of penalties for acts of aggression against aiders. The final form of the judgement will be known only after a possible examination of the appeal, which may be crucial for future cases of assault on medical personnel in Poland.