The leaders besides focused on what China is today. Is it a middle-income country or a country that has achieved a advanced level of prosperity? In the background of these questions, the question remained whether China was able to stimulate home request and thus compensate for the failure of part or, unlikely, of the full US market.
The controversial message by U.S. Vice president JD Vance, who called the Chinese “ruralists”, was besides discussed. Radosław Pyffel, referring to this statement, states that for the highly classy and prestigious Chinese, specified statements are simply inexcusable.
In the further part of the podcast, the subject of the discussion is the issue of the degree of Chinese aspirations – is the contemporary People's Republic of China imperialist in specified a way as Russia, whose ambitions do not know metaphorically and virtually borders? Is China inactive capable of any kind of restraint? Radosław Pyffel seems to be inclined to believe that Beijing and the Russians disagree fundamentally in this respect. The only exception here is Taiwan. The question of whether China can choose to effort to take the island by force, the guest answers: nothing is excluded, but in Chinese strategical culture the necessity to usage force is actually seen as a failure. The expert predicts that Beijing will increase the force on Taipei while trying to avoid force solutions.
There was besides a thread of Vietnam, or more widely, of countries close China, which were very clearly afraid of the emergence of Chinese power. Paradoxically, these countries were in a situation of interconnection, not with the mediate country, but with the United States, thereby weakening the possible anti-Chinese alliance. From the above it would be – ironically! – that Donald Trump, declaring that China is the biggest challenge for the United States, tried to weaken the anti-Chinese front significantly.
