In December 2025, the European Parliament voted on a paper supporting the European Citizens' Initiative "My Voice, My Choice", which concerns access to abortion services in the European Union. The resolution calls on the European Commission to make a voluntary financial mechanics that would support associate States offering safe and legal abortions to persons travelling from countries with restrictive regulations. The paper passed by a majority of 358 votes in favour, 202 against and 79 abstentions. But that is not the end.
The Council of Europe wants to punish for opposition to genderism/neolysenkoism. Now. On 29 January, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe will vote on a extremist resolution that can open the door to punishing people for opposition to deviative ideology. Officially, this paper is presented as a ban on alleged conversion practices. However, the real threat is in detail. The text smuggles the notions of "sexual identity" and "sexual expression". In practice, this means that the refusal to recognise the identity that the kid has invented can be regarded as a ‘violence’, ‘violence’ and a criminal offence.
The subject is assessed by critics as an example of the expansion of "gender" policy and interference with national legal systems governing abortion and household life. Opponents point out that the EP's actions are aimed at establishing standards that are not included in the EU Treaties and are opposed to conventional household values in any associate States.
The European Parliament has for years adopted papers on the strategy for sex equality and action plans in this area, while the EP adopts reports and resolutions on this subject, calling on the Commission to put forward further and further strategies.
These actions are purely ideological and detached from real social problems, as in practice they focus on the broad notion of "equality" and "sexuality", not only without clear legitimacy in technological regulations, but besides without a legal mandate resulting from the EU treaties. Critics point out that the creation of specified papers frequently precedes the public debate in the associate States and imposes a certain interpretative framework.
The concept of "gender", widely utilized in EU and Council of Europe papers on social policy, equality and education, is simply a subject of strong criticism in many public and academic environments. For any of the observers of the European institutions' action in this area, in peculiar the vote on resolutions on "reproductive health" and "sex equality" are evidence of ideological prejudices by the members of the European Parliament and the effort to impose utmost left-wing social standards beyond the EU's legally defined competences.
In combination with the constant tampering by the EU institutions with net censorship and punishing the alleged "talk of hatred", or actual statements about the deviant ideology, we are faced with an increasingly clear script of building super-totalitarianism within the EU, where the russian Union was a cheerful plush.
We besides recommend: U.S. Attorney’s Office Urka forced to prosecute the falcon “Abotak”
