When the elections come, politicians and all the “authority” ointment say that participation in them “is our moral duty” and that if we do not vote for 1 of the candidates, then we have no right to complain later. It's an old trick to make us feel guilty and forced. It is simply a pity that they forget to add that this agreement applies erstwhile these politicians have an equally strong moral backbone. And with that, it's hard to go. So what are the alternatives? That's in a minute.
But before we get to that, a word from where in people there is so much interior force to vote against the organization alternatively of a organization (or just a man). In alleged democratic countries, frequently politicians to companies with the media intentionally make a situation that shows that citizens inactive have a choice between 2 large parties, specified as Poland, the USA and Canada. It is not only the usage of the old rule of "divide and rule" that people alternatively of uniting themselves against power engender among themselves in unproductive disputes, but besides a targeted financial-corporate lobby strategy, due to the fact that it is easier to influence the actions of 2 large groups than many smaller ones. Unfortunately, 80-90% of the population accept this narrative, recognizing it as a natural state. So much for admission.
So what's left? There are respective options.
1. NO PARTICIPATION IN CHOICES
Low attendance shows small assurance in the rulers and the lower they are, the worse they are in the eyes of the public, especially international. Therefore, no politician, no substance how good the face of the game, will pass beside it. So if a individual does not see any candidate who he believes deserves to be trusted, he has the right, without remorse, to resign from the election.
2. IMPLEMENTING A average VOICE
Another form of expression of consternation due to low level of candidates. Even more clear, due to the fact that any of those who do not simply "have it somewhere" vote, while the invalid vote shows without uncertainty the interest of the voter in the affairs of the country, in addition in a clear and open manner. It may be peculiarly helpful to add a sincere and stingy (but not rude!) remark to leave no uncertainty about the message.
3. VOTE IN DEFENCE GROUP
In opposition to media coverage, it is worth remembering that the choice is much wider and there are respective smaller committees that seem to be worth the attention, though it is simply a pity that they are not able to bet besides many districts. In this context, the Movement of Prosperity and Peace is at the forefront, and candidacy specified as the Antiparty or the average Country is besides on the rise. So by spending any time on research, you can fulfill an electorative work without feeling a taste.
The trick of the people of power and the media is to put force on us so that, even if we don't feel like it, we go to elections and vote for the parties that are under our control, thus sustaining a flawed but beneficial arrangement for them. As you can see, however, we are not doomed to go this way. And then let each of us, in accordance with his beliefs, decide which of the ideas he chooses, or possibly implement his own.
Read also:
The question of tanks given to Ukraine is propaganda? Minister Błaszczak's Kuriosian consequence [WIDEO]
