The future of Russian support for the DPRK

Analysis briefly:

– Due to the limited resources of Moscow, further support to the DPRK may take the form of technology transfers and assistance in establishing the production of the arms systems afraid in the DPRK.

– There is possible for cooperation in the modernization of the Pjongjangu Navy, in peculiar in the field of conventional submarines and frigates.

– It is besides possible to support North Korea in the construction of fighting infantry wagons or the transfer by Russia of applicable cognition about the protection of vehicles from unmanned vehicles.

– It is besides not possible that Moscow provides assistance in the construction of unmanned aircraft of different types.

Introduction

The relations between the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (KRLD) and Russia grew importantly after the Moscow invasion of Ukraine began. North Korea utilized Russia's considerable request for military equipment and ammunition to exit global isolation. This made Pyongyang a key supplier of a wide scope of equipment, from ammunition and ballistic missiles to, among others, wheeled bullsae-4 tank destroyers or self-propelled M1989 Koksan. He besides supported the aggressor by sending a contingent of the Korean People's Army (KAL), which proved crucial in fighting for the course circuit. The number of North Koreans who took part in the fighting on the Russian side is estimated, depending on the sources, around 11,000 –15,000. Losses incurred by North Korean troops are equally hard to estimate. For example, an interview by the Republic of Korea (RK) gives a figure of about 2000 killed, which in another sources sometimes reaches 6,000 people. Regardless of the exact number, losses were very high, in peculiar during the first period of commitment of the quota in the Kurdish Oblast. Moscow in exchange for North Korean military aid decided to donate among others. raw materials, food, fuel and military equipment specified as anti-aircraft systems Pantsir S-1 is S-300 or S-400. Transfers were besides made Missile-related technologies. Information on plans for the joint establishment of Moscow and Pjongjang was besides published in the infosphere Shahed drone production in the territory of North Korea. another aspects of bilateral cooperation, specified as alleged transfer of atomic reactor components for a DPRK nuclear-powered submarine presently under construction, or transfers of Su-27 and MiG-29 fighters They haven't been confirmed yet.

Since the war in Ukraine is inactive going on and it is likely that the future will not end, it is likely that further cooperation between the 2 parties will continue. Of course, it can besides take place after the end of the war. This article will examine the possible areas in which Russia could support North Korea, taking into account the needs of Pyongyang and the capabilities of Moscow itself. This list, of course, does not cover the issue.

I. Navy

The Navy of the Korean People's Army (MW KAL) has been in the incorrect position for decades. While any modernisation programmes are taking place, they seem to ignore its real needs and focus on structures that are mainly propaganda significance. This led to a situation where Pyongyang builds a nuclear-powered submarine and destroyers, while the vast majority of MW KAL equipment does not meet the requirements of the modern battlefield.

Russian support could consist of the transfer of submarine plans to the 8776/636 task and the provision of technological and method support allowing their production to commence in North Korea. This would lead to a crucial improvement in the situation of MW KAL. It now has completely obsolete submarines. Namely, the foundation of the Pyongyang submarine is about 20 Romeo submarines, 13 of which were built in North Korea in the years 1976 – 1995. Outside one except, these units are improbable to have been upgraded and de facto It is not known how many of them are in the ministry. In addition, the DPRK has about 40-50 miniature submarines, the armament of which is very limited due to tiny size [15]. [and] A water component of the North Korean Navy is in a akin situation. It is based overwhelmingly on tiny ships serving only for coastal combat, respective corvettes and 2 frigates whose condition is unknown[16]. but for only 2 corvettes capable of firing, among others. missiles cruiseThese units are obsolete.

It seems impossible to donate completed units or build them in Russia to Pyongyang, due to the crucial needs of the Russian Navy. On the another hand, cooperation could be established between Russian and North Korean investigation centres in order to make a fresh conventional submarine that would then be produced for MW KAL. In both situations, provision by Moscow of certain components cannot be excluded, in so far as Pjongjang can later start production. To equip North Korea's fleet with modern submarines would be a major challenge for the DPRK industry, but would be a qualitative leap and could lead to any change in the balance of power on the Korean peninsula – even if Romeo's ships were not replaced on a 1:1 basis.

As with submarines, Russia could aid the DPRK build water vessels specified as frigates. Moscow could give Pyongyang plans for a frigate task 22350 or aid to make a fresh frigate by North Korea. Support for the construction of smaller units seems unnecessary, given that the DPRK has successfully built Amnok class corvettes. fresh frigates would be able to supply North Korean destroyers with adequate support, which they are almost completely deprived of at present. The North Korean shipbuilding manufacture would besides gain appropriate experience in the construction of watercraft, the deficiency of which was highlighted during the work on destroyers.

II. Land Forces

Given that the vast majority of Russian engagement in Ukraine is based precisely on the terrestrial component of the Russian armed forces, support in this area would most likely be based overwhelmingly on technology transfers, technological assistance or the transfer of individual copies of the military equipment in order to enable the Koreans to carry out appropriate research. The transfer of crucial amounts of weapons by Moscow should be excluded in advance.

The Korean People's Army Land Forces (SL KAL) have a hard hardware gap to explain. Depending on the sources, they have unknown number BWP-1 or even no combat infantry wagons (BWP), based on lightly armed armored transporters[19]. KAL's equipment in modern combat infantry wagons would greatly improve the firepower of North Korean infantry, in peculiar given that its possible opponents – the armed forces of the Republic of Korea and the United States – have BWP. For Pjongjang, it would be most beneficial for Russia to make a BWP task that meets the needs of the North Koreans and not to start production of an existing vehicle like BWP-3. This would let for further experience in the improvement of modern combat vehicles. Moscow could supply technological and method support, possibly supply a single prototype or respective pre-series units and further aid establish production.

Russia could besides share its experience of securing land vehicles against drone attacks. It should be noted that the North Korean quota in Kursk did not fight with armored equipment, meaning that Pyongyang does not have direct experience in this area. Moscow could give Pyongyang models of appropriate anti-drone shields, drone jamming systems designs, or aid make their North Korean counterparts. Russian instructors could besides supply training for crews of KAL vehicles to familiarise them with the threat posed by unmanned vehicles. It wouldn't be the first time the Russians drove training in the DPRK.

In the event of a North Korean war, it is considered that the manufacture would not be able to supply a steady supply of dense equipment to compensate for losses incurred on the front[22]. It would so be crucial for SL KAL to have adequate method safety vehicles and another vehicles capable of evacuation and repair of damaged dense vehicles. However, well-known to the public vehicles of this kind in the KAL arsenal are obsolete, which makes it questionable for them to evacuate more modern, and consequently heavier, vehicles like the Chonma-2 (M-2020). It is so possible to cooperate with Moscow in developing and subsequently building modern vehicles of this type. In fact, it cannot be excluded that Russia itself could benefit from cooperation in this respect, which besides needs crucial amounts of vehicles of method security.

III. another possible areas of cooperation

It is possible that in the future aviation cooperation between Russia and Pyongyang could be strengthened. Apart from the aforementioned information on the transfer of aircraft, the parties could jointly undertake to modernise the most modern aircraft in the DPRK arsenal – MiG-29 and Su-25. In addition, while the sale of modern Su-35 or even Su-57 structures in North Korea is very unlikely, it is possible to interest Pyongyang Russian helicopters. It should be noted that even during the ongoing war in Ukraine, information about the transportation of To Tehran Mi-28 helicopters, which means that Russia inactive has a spare capacity to export them. The DPRK's acquisition of assault helicopters would let KAL to get fresh capabilities, given that it does not presently have any specified helicopters[24].

Russia and the DPRK could besides engage extensively in the construction of unmanned aircraft. In 2025, news came out that Moscow was going to support Pyongyang in establishing drone production Geran in the territory of North Korea. In order to improve this process, the peculiar economical region in Alabad, where Geran is produced, is expected to have a crucial number (some sources are even talking about 25,000) North Korean workers. After returning to the DPRK beyond the construction of drones, they would transmit cognition to fresh workers. In addition to Geran drones, Russia could offer Pyongyang cooperation in the improvement and production of unmanned another types that are Slowly implemented to arm North Korean armed forces. This solution would besides be beneficial for Moscow, as it would possibly be provided with an additional supply chain for unmanned workers, located outside both Ukraine and another possible opponents. In addition to information likely to have a affirmative impact on the quality of North Korean weapons manufacture products for Pyongyang, it would be crucial for Moscow to share the tactics of utilizing this equipment as well as conducting, at least initially, training for their operation.

It is besides possible for Moscow to transfer technology related to multiple reagent vehicles (MIRV), which would be highly beneficial for the North Korean atomic programme. Even if information about older types of warheads were provided, Pjongjang would jump over a phase of highly long-term and costly research, which could lead to failure. It should be noted that this technology is priority for the regime. Given the fact that the Russians have already supported the North Korean rocket program, contributing importantly to the improvement of missiles KN-23, further cooperation is possible. However, it cannot be excluded that the transfer of specified key technology from the position of the DPRK would be supported by Moscow's circumstantial expectations of further arms supply or increase in the size of the North Korean quota. It is besides unknown how the proliferation of MIRV (if detected) would be affected by the United States, which are de facto most threatened by North Korean warheads.

Summary

There are a number of areas in which the DPRK could be supported by Russia. However, in almost all case this support would should be based mainly on the transfer of applicable technologies and the provision of assistance in the construction of individual weapons systems in North Korea. In addition to a fewer cases specified as helicopters, Moscow is presently incapable straight to deliver measurable amounts of weapons systems. However, adequate technological support for the construction of ships, drones or BWP could greatly contribute to improving the situation of the North Korean armed forces. In addition, Russia would benefit from the transfer of appropriate technologies to let the production of the arms systems afraid in North Korea, as in the event of a war it could be supplied by military facilities located in the DPRK. At the time of writing this article, it appears that the transfer of drone technology and cooperation on land vehicles is the most likely. On the another hand, the joint construction of ships would be dependent on North Korea to carry out adequate investments in shipbuilding infrastructure. The transfer of MIRV technology may depend on the global situation – it cannot be excluded that Moscow could usage this position as a scarer to exert force on Japan, the Republic of Korea or the United States. The acquisition of Russian weapons on commercial terms by Pyongyang is at present improbable due to the mediocre state of the DPRK's economy.

However, it should be noted that the Russian-North Korean partnership seems to be completely transactional, so the scale of the support provided by Russia will most likely depend on the level of supply of equipment by Pyongyang. It is besides hard to find whether after the end of the war in Ukraine it will proceed to function on akin conditions, or whether Moscow will decide to reduce the rank of this alliance. However, it seems likely that in exchange for the transfer of any key MIRV-like technologies, Moscow may want for adequate supplies of equipment from Pyongyang.

It seems that with the change in the global situation the times erstwhile Beijing tried to halt North Korean arms programs have ended. At the moment, the DPRK is simply a useful partner for the PRC, preventing to any degree the United States from full focusing on stopping China in the region. North Korea besides acts as a buffer, separating the Chinese border from the territory of the Republic of Korea, and hence from the American armed forces. The PRC will most likely not protest if technological cooperation between Russia and the DPRK is further deepened, peculiarly if it concerns conventional forces, as this allows the situation of the North Korean army to be improved without China being straight involved. On the another hand, the excessive independency of Pjongjangu from Beijing may importantly reduce the Chinese's ability to exert force on North Korea and thus reduce the predictability of the regime's activities.

For Poland and its allies, a definite problem in the event of the war with Russia would be the production lines of data types of military equipment established in North Korea as part of military cooperation between Moscow and Pyongyang. They would be beyond the scope of the vast majority of the North Atlantic Alliance states, the attacks themselves on the DPRK's territory could lead not only to the direct entry of Pyongyang into the war but besides to a strong reaction from Beijing. Furthermore, due to the nature of the North Korean regime, diversionary activities in the DPRK would be highly hard or even impossible. For this reason, any action taken by Pjongjang and Moscow in this respect should be closely monitored and appropriate action plans should be updated taking into account additional sources of military equipment for Moscow.

Bibliography:

• A. Simpson, With fresh wapons, cash and battleground experience from Ukraine, North Korea has become much more strong, The Conversation, https://theconversation.com/with-new-weapons-cash-and-battleground-experience-from-Ukraine-north-korea-has-become-much-more-forbidable-262939 (accessed 24.02.2026).

• M. Carlough, J. Kennedy, How North Korea Has Bolstered Russia’s War in Ukraine, CFR, https://www.cfr.org/articles/how-north-korea-has-bolstered-russias-war-Ukraine (accessed 24.02.2026).

• H. Joo-young, Pyongyang plans to defloy additional 6,000 troops to Russia, The Korea Herald, https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10567021 (accessed 24.02.2026).

• S. Newton, North Korean trolls in Russia are being redeployed as Pyongyang seeks tactics and tech, Forces News, https://www.forcesnews.com/north-korea/north-korean-troops-sent-russia-are-being-used-drone-production-media-access-tightens (accessed 24.02.2026).

• North Korea conviction Russia millions of associations in exchange for food: Seoul, Aljazeera, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/2/28/n-korea-sent-russia-millions-of-munitions-in-exchange-for-food-says-seoul (accessed: 15.02.2026).

• J. Mackenzie, Satellite images show Russia giving N Korea oil, breaking sanctions, BBC, https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjr4pr0gyyzo (accessed: 15.02.2026).

• T. Safronov, Russia Arms North Korea: Pantsir-S1 Systems Developed in Pyongyang, Militarian, https://militarni.com/en/news/russia-arms-north-korea-pantsir-s1-systems-deployed-in-pyongyang/ (accessed: 15.02.2026).

• A. Sokolin, Russia give North Korea advanced air defenses over Ukraine war support: Report, NK News, https://www.nknews.org/2025/05/russia-gave-north-korea-advanced-air-defenses-over-Ukraine-war-support-report/ (accessed: 15.02.2026).

• O. Pietrewicz, M. A. Piotrowski, Russia Supports North Korea’s atomic and rocket Programmes, PISM, https://pism.pl/publications/russia-supports-north-koreas-nuclear-and-mission-programmes (accessed 15.02.2025).

• S. Kozatskyi, Budanov: Russia to aid North Korea Establishment of Shahed UAVs, Militarian, https://militaryi.com/en/news/budanov-russia-to-help-north-korea-establish-production-of-shahed-uavs/ (accessed: 15.02.2026).

• Adversary Entente Task Force Update, September 25, 2025, ISW, https://understandingwar.org/research/adversary-entente/adversary-entente-task-force-update-september-25-2025/ (accessed: 15.02.2026).

• T. Newdick, Russia Giving North Korea MiG-29s And Su-27s Isn’t That Straightforward, SCI, https://www.twz.com/air/russia-giving-north-korea-mig-29s-and-su-27s-isnt-that-straightforward (accessed: 15.02.2026).

• North Korea Submarine Capabilities, NTI, https://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/north-korea-submarine-capability/ (accessed: 15.02.2026).

• H I Sutton, North Korea’s fresh Submarine Carries 10 atomic Mississippi, Naval News, https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2023/09/north-koreas-new-submarine-carries-10-nuclear-missions/ (accessed: 15.02.2026).

• (2025) Chapter Five: Asia, The Military Balance, 125:1, 206-311, DOI:10.1080/04597222.2025.2445477, p. 269.

• The Military Balance... p. 269.

• D. Mitsopoulos, North Korea reveals a fresh cruise missile-armed corvette, Naval News, https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2023/08/north-korea-new-cruise-missile-amnok-class-corvette/ (accessed: 15.02.2026).

• A Visual Guide to North Korea’s Fighting VehiclesOryx, https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2023/03/a-visual-guide-to-north-koreas-fighting.html (accessed: 15.02.2026).

• The Military Balance... p. 268.

• A. Giusti, S. Lucian, Ch’ŏnma-2 (M-2020), Tank Encyclopedia, https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/new-north-korean-mbt/ (accessed 15.02.2026)

• A. Sokolin, Russia training North Korean drone pilots close Wonsan resort, capital: Kyiv, NK News, https://www.nknews.org/2025/07/russia-training-north-korean-drone-pilots-near-wonsan-minister-capital-kyiv/ (accessed: 15.02.2026).

• ATP 7-100.2 North Korean Tactics, Washington 2020, p. H-4.

• J. Trevithick, Evidence Of Mi-28 Havoc Attack Helicopters Delivered to Iran Grows, SCI, https://www.twz.com/air/evidence-of-mi-28-havoc-attack-helicopters-delived-to-iran-growths (accessed: 15.02.2026).

• The Military Balance... p. 270.

• S. Kozatskyi, Budanov: Russia to aid North Korea Establishment of Shahed UAVs, Military, https://militaryi.com/en/news/budanov-russia-to-help-north-korea-establish-production-of-shahed-uavs/ (accessed 24.02.2026).

• H. Altman, North Korea Sending Russia 1000 Of Workers To Build Shahed Drones: Report, TWZ, https://www.twz.com/news-features/north-korea-sending-russia-thousand-of-workers-to-build-shahed-drones-report (accessed 24.02.2026).

• M. Williams, Current State of North Korea’s Drone Program, 38 North, https://www.38north.org/2025/09/current-status-of-north-koreas-drone-program/ (accessed 24.02.2026).

• J. T. Joo, Silent warheads: The hidden race of N. Korea’s atomic ambitions, regular NK, https://www.dailynk.com/english/silent-warheads-the-hidden-race-of-n-koreas-nuclear-ambitions/ (accessed 24.02.2026).

• K. Hodunova, Russia importantly improved North Korea’s soddy KN-23 ballistic missions, Ukraine’s Budanov Says, Kyiv Independent, https://kyivindependent.com/russia-helped-to-significatively-improve-north-koreas-inaccurate-kn-23-ballistic-missions-budanov-says/ (accessed 24.02.2026).