
On Saturday, "Gazeta Wyborcza" Prof. Matczak warned that "PiS will come back quickly, due to the fact that we learned little". He emphasized that elites ostentatiously despise simple people, ridicule the religiousness of Poles, and besides propose "to flood PiS with concrete".
He wrote. That the past in Turkey was put in Recep Erdogan's prison, which did not halt him from coming back and winning the election. He's inactive in charge of Turkey. A akin script can happen in the United States — having legal problems Donald Trump can return to the White House.
The hell has broken loose as if Motherczak: "it is going to unwise clash with a universal, deep and justified request to settle the Law and Justices".
Mother's denied it. He said the PiS had to be settled. He pointed out that Andrzej Duda, Jarosław Kaczyński and Zbigniew Ziobro should stand before the Court of State for trying a constitutional coup.
A fewer more Mothers:
• Tusk should establish 2 teams: one, made up of lawyers, to settle PiS officers. The second, composed of psychologists and sociologists, to realize why respective million Poles inactive support the anti-democratic organization and destroying the regulation of law.
• The first team, led, for example, by Adam Bodnar, should be composed of prosecutors who will begin criminal proceedings against Beata Szydło and Mateusz Morawiecki for not publishing TK's judgments — due to the fact that it was a coup — and for politicians' contacts with TK judges, including their meetings with Julia Przyłębska.
The second team, in which the left should play a major role, due to the fact that it has an empathic ear for the needs of the alleged average man and sees further than the horns of Wilanów, should present a strategy of caring for the needs of the PiS electorate under Donald Tusk. This is, of course, a symbolic council.
It is about balancing 2 areas: clearing officers and caring about the electorate.
• In the context of president Duda, it is not just about the controversial pardon of Minister Mariusz Kamiński, which occurred in 2015, in the course of an ongoing criminal case, before the final judgement of the court. A pardon for a formally innocent individual is like giving a divorce to a fiancé.
The president in office has far more serious actions — including the assassination of the ultimate Court, for which he should be accounted for.
• 1 regulation in all of these cases: first a calm show to everyone, including the electorate of the PiS, the crime, then punishment.
• It is the occupation of lawyers to pour a bucket of cold water on their heads — there is simply a advanced hazard that we will be confused with the demolition of institutions, that we will treat the plague with cholera. alternatively of canceling only doubles, which is legal, we will "zero" the full TK, which is proposed by Prof. Sadurski, and which has no legal basis and will establish a tragic precedent. If we do this once, the TK will turn into a State Treasury company and be a political spoil after all election.
• If I compose now that the contempt of the PiS electorate, seen e.g. in mocking crucial spiritual values, increases the likelihood of this organization returning to power, I do so that this return will not succeed. due to the fact that it would be a tragedy for Poland.
• There are many people in the coalition who realize this need, including Donald Tusk. The chance to support this approach extensively is seen in the individual of Adam Bodnar, as well as the politicians of the left if they focus on social policy, which they realize perfectly, not on ideological issues that polarize. In 2015, the PiS won the election, due to the fact that better than the opposition understood the needs of average people. Now it lost due to the fact that it wanted to destruct the institutions liable for the regulation of law and thus impose its number views on the majority, for example on the regulation of abortion. In order for this organization not to return to power, it is essential to act the same way as the Law and Justice in terms of knowing the needs of average people, and rather the other on the regulation of law and imposing its opinion on others.