The trial of Matthew Piskorski, or prosecutor of “good advice”.
I seldom compose about it in the pages of Polish Thought, but always since the trial. Matthew Piskorski are held in open mode, I effort to be on them. Not as a witness to the stricto sense, but as a “witness of history”. due to the fact that past is the front.
I wasn't alone this time. There was a typical of the association of human rights defenders, and there was besides a full squad of American tv for Poles, seemingly motivated by fresh reports about the possible clash between Matthew Piskorski and the Sejm. This is due to the fact that the Democrats of the 3rd Republic feared that as a consequence of democratic sentences of voters, “the accused of espionage” could be found in parliament.
That is why, in total, I was happy with the situation, due to the fact that among the “important social interests”, as the writer said in the courtroom, there was besides a sympathetic editor who, working for the erstwhile media on his CV, found my presence worthy in his article... A mouse pad. It is 1 of those who, like a mantra, repeats this phrase “accused of espionage”, most likely not at all by bad will. Most chief writers of the case most likely believe that due to the fact that they did not have the anticipation before, and now the desire or the order, to face it with reality in the courtroom.
The prosecutor Jan Drelewski was besides clearly excited, who had inherited the case from the retired Annie Karlinska, who for any reason failed to scope the end of her “life work”, which possibly was for her a form of settlement with biography. Is anything comic like a prosecutor who is simply a associate of the PZPR accusing individual of “advocating Russian interests”, right?
But Jan Drelewski It's a fresh generation. Disgusting, faithful, dedicated to the service of the 3rd Republic. And barking. Noticed and appreciated for the PiSu regime, he was sent to fight sexual number activists. After the Karlinska era, he got Mateusz Piskorski. 1 time I was rather amazed that the prosecutor was not asking witnesses any questions at all (yes, a case almost 10 years after the assault of Homeland safety on Piskorski is at the phase of questioning witnesses of the prosecution!) and I begin to uncertainty if he even knows the case file.
On the another hand, however, these hearings are dear ladies and gentlemen. The 1 she's writing about started with the witness' testimony. Łukasz Jastrzębski, explaining the presence of mineral water at the gathering in 2015! For the sake of fairness, let us add that these superb investigations are not so much an initiative of the court as the eagles of the ABW. most likely uncovering the origin of backing for this mineral could aid in uncovering the infamous “money box” from which we were to fund the Change Party. These are serious operational methods, serious officers, dealing with a serious case, which I know.
We besides have a prof. of discipline who does not know the defendant, but is asked for opinions on global relations, the practice of states and opinions on the defendant's articles written on a publically available portal. He's not the first scientist to stand trial. There was besides a promoter of the technological work of Piskorski. Don't get me wrong: these are all breathtaking discussions, but what does this gotta do with criminal matters?
My suspicion of prosecutor Jan Drelewski makes me ask him a question about this case at last. In fact, about its very circumstantial aspect, which someway is forgotten by the establishment fools. Recommendations UN Human Rights Council, which in 2018 asked the State authorities to: 1) The release of Matthew Piskorski 2) the closure of the case 3) the payment of compensation 4) the criminal liability of the guilty of his death. So I'm asking. Drelewski refuses to answer and ritually refers to the Ombudsman. To my attention, the spokesperson will not dig through all these files, Drelewski like a catarine, the same. He's going to the gym.
During the break, however, he gladly talks to the writer mentioned. So effort two. He's not going to answer. I tell him that as a payer of his wage I would like to hear the answer. Drelewski evaporates that he has a solution: I can pack and leave the country. That's how much a man has to tell me who makes my money harder to live for me and my friends. The arrogance of prosecutors is something individual truly needs to clean up. But the social force I hereby request works best. Next time, let's go ask him that question in five.
It's over. The next fewer hours of my life have passed to hear stories of friends or strangers' life stories Matthew PiskorskiNone of which even come to “co-operation with abroad intelligence”. Drelewski smiles stupidly under his nose erstwhile the witness tells that he is impressed with what people from all over the planet can talk to Mateusz Piskorski, but his effort to torpedo the question asked by the defence is rejected by the court. due to the fact that that's what she asked the NSA witness.
We're leaving the gym. I say to a journalist: “It will be hard for the editor to write, what?” I get a communication smile. I handed her a copy “Last Rakowiecka Prisoner“ at your own expense. Who knows, possibly he'll get out of the comfort zone? She's not looking bad out of her eyes.
However, American tv for Poles makes conversation with the accused. The word “Russian money” falls more frequently than “centralized” in the commentary of the Extraclass games. Piskorski responds patiently, he is not provoked. Again, I rub my eyes with amazement, due to the fact that the writer pulls out the Black card Dugin. As this “left” Piskorski works with “right” Braun. That's syncretism! Dugin wrote about it! Relations in the media mentioned above, I did not announcement until this text.
I would like to invitation you to another hearing. Mateusz Piskorski requests full transparency from the beginning of the court line. He's against the D.A. Drelewski doesn't truly like us being there. He'd alternatively we left the country. But who's gonna gain his credit?
Tomasz Jankowski
