President Nawrocki's contacts with people from far-right and criminal backgrounds, his symbolic gestures towards the Kibolian militias and opposition to regulations ordering the net space rise questions about the limits of work of the head of state. More and more shows that force and radicalism cease to be a margin in Poland – and they begin to penetrate the mainstream of public life.
Common language with criminals
One of the most powerful images to be heard in the conversation is the scene of the cordial welcome of president Karol Nawrocki with a man known in the kibolski environment as “Dragon”. It is simply a figure repeatedly punished, combined with violent beatings, incitement to hatred and neo-Nazi activity. Not only did the president not distance himself from this relationship, but he spoke publically about “common language” and being “together”.
For many observers it is simply a symbolic motion – a signal sent not to average fans, who make up the vast majority of the stadium audience, but to the most radical, violent margin. Margin, where kibolism has been linked for years to organized crime, ideology of hatred and the cult of violent force.
Freak Fights are banned? | president hits 5 with Nazis
Violence seen From Close Up
In the conversation between Piotr Szumlewicz and Piotr Nowak, the individual evidence of 1 of the participants of the Equality March in Białystok in 2019 besides returns – events that went back to past as 1 of the most violent examples of the crowd's attack on peaceful demonstration. Blood in the streets, stones flying towards a teenager, police passivity, and the presence of the same people who present appear at authoritative events involving the president.
It is at specified moments that the question of "common language" becomes dramatic. Is it the language of national symbols? Or the tongue of fists, contempt and intimidation?
Political calculation alternatively of case
The speakers have no doubt: specified gestures are not accidental. The president – even if he does not think he is an outstanding strategist – knows precisely who he is gathering and what signal he is sending. extremist environments, though few, are highly disciplined, online active and ready for aggressive mobilisation. It is simply a loud, visible and effective electorate in imposing narrative.
The problem is that flirting with force acts as a normalization mechanism. What was explicitly condemned a fewer years ago is now being relativized, justified or silenced.
Freak Fights are banned? | president hits 5 with Nazis
Patogaleas a social mirror
The second crucial subject of the conversation is the Fame MMA kind gala phenomenon – performances in which violence, humiliation and utmost characters become media goods. The example of Marianna Schreiber, her aggressive attitude towards a much weaker rival and her relation with the utmost right-wing environments, shows how pathology is rewarded present with visibility and money.
It is not a athletics – it is simply a performance of a social degrengolada, in which it is not a skill that matters, but the ability to make scandal. The problem begins erstwhile specified spectacles cease to be niche and become part of the mainstream mass culture, commented on by large media.
Country that withdraws
Against this background, the President's opposition to regulations aimed at reducing online force and misinformation is peculiarly worrying. Veto to the solutions implementing the EU DSA Directive has been justified by slogans about freedom of expression and the alleged "orwell censorship".
Meanwhile, it was about the fast removal of paedophile content, criminal threats, organized disinformation and hatred speech – tools that were actually utilized in the hybrid war against Poland. The paradox is that the President, who himself admits the existence of specified a threat, blocks instruments to defend the state and citizens.
The boundaries have been moved
A image emerges from the conversation of a country where the limits of admissibility are moving on. erstwhile the president unrestrainedly embraces the hands of people associated with neo-Naziism, erstwhile force becomes entertainment, and erstwhile hatred becomes “opinion”, it is hard to talk of marginal incidents.
This is no longer a single scandal. It's a trial. And its effects – normalization of brutality, consent to contempt and weakening of institutions – may prove to be far more permanent than temporary political gains.
Are Maduro and Trump worth each other? - Piotr Szumlewicz and Piotr Nowak