Clearance of effort
In the 1970s, professional soldiers built garages on military grounds for their own resources, for which they contributed to the Military Barrack Administration fees for the lease of a military closed area, property taxation and for the utilized electricity. This continued until 1997, erstwhile WAK concluded fresh garages with users "on the lease of a closed military area where a garage was built from the tenant's own resources based on a fixed location". Since 2015, the area has been managed by the Military Property Agency, which has presented garages to users with contract annexes, completely changing them (e.g. their erstwhile title has been replaced by the title "garage lease agreement"). In March of that year, AMW sent out another annex, in which it gives the contract fresh content, according to which the built garages from their own resources become the property of AMW, which gives them ‘in rent’ to existing users. The annex shall be accompanied by a notification of a multiple rent increase. I did not accept the fresh annex and in accordance with the agreement (concerned for an indefinite period) I declared the garage rental. Could AMW have taken the garages from those who built them from their own resources based on the 1974 fixed location issued by WIAB WOW? In a conversation with many users, garages learned that efforts were made at AMW to compensate for the costs incurred in purchasing construction materials. In response, they heard: How do you prove the acquisition of building materials? Do you have acquisition bills? Can an annex to the contract radically change the subject substance of the agreement and its contents? – Andrzej Jarzynkowski
