I just hit it. crazyly interesting text On a crazyly interesting platform. I am a regular reader of it due to its very advanced level (also intellectual). I've tried to get approval to translate, but the email address I gave you is dead. But the text is so interesting that I decided to print it. I hope the author doesn't mind.
I highly urge this page, all texts are in English, German, French and Russian.
Actually, there is nothing in this text that I would not have written here before. The author perfectly put everything together. The difference between us is that from the beginning I had no illusions that sooner or later there must be a decisive clash, due to the fact that for both parties it is “to be or not to be” – that is, existential conflict. Hänseler is only now beginning to see this. Another difference is to look at gigantic debt and idiotic odds on stock exchanges. Hänseler wonders them, for me it is simply the effect of processes taking place in the monetary system.
Reading the passage in which Putin speaks of elegant men who explain to the fresh president how things are going and who's truly in charge, I thought to myself, how does he know that? Didn't they come to him? erstwhile it is seen that Nabiullina, alternatively of accusing herself of acting against the country and removing the head of the central bank, is under his protection, it seems rather likely...
But truly scary thoughts came to me erstwhile I read the part about Iran. My individual contacts confirm that Iranian society is opposed to any negotiations with “Great Satan” (as the Iranians specify the US). I long ago expected an Israeli atomic attack on Iran to take place, and I fear that we are getting closer to it. The news that Israel was planning an attack on Ali Chamenei’s ceremony ceremonies was just being leaked. We do not know if this information is true, but it is highly probable! We must realize that we are dealing with psychopaths convinced that they are allowed to do anything due to the fact that they are the chosen ones of God! The silence of the planet in the face of genocide in the Gaza Strip and in another regions of Palestine only confirms their conviction!
Paradoxically another serious threat is the method backwardness of the West. We are fed myths of American military power. Meanwhile, the only weapon that matches what Russia has is atomic submarines. They only make Russia incapable to attack the United States with impunity. Russia has a full array of hypersonic missiles against which there is no defense. Dark Eagle – the first American hypersonic rocket TO BE MAY be ready after 2030! In addition, a tiny carried burden makes it a firecracker alternatively than a serious weapon! Unlike Russian missiles, it will not have maneuverability. With the aid of its hypersonic rockets, Russia is already able to destruct most of the American ballistic rocket silos today. Completely outdated – due to the fact that flying on permanent trajectory – Minutes, which can be launched, will be an easy mark for Russian anti-aircraft defense. But there are inactive American atomic submarines with their missiles... For now the full West dreams of power, but erstwhile the awakening comes, the power circles may conclude that before it's besides late, you gotta put everything on 1 card and press the proverbial red button. Unfortunately, this script is becoming increasingly probable...
But let's get to the article!
Start of Translation
The fact is acceptable to people!
Europe refuses Russia's peace and seeks war. The United States and Israel want a war with many opponents – reflections
Written by Peter Hänseler
Introduction
Ingeborg Bachmann came to the conclusion in 1959 that fact is acceptable to a man due to the fact that he is able to accept it, even if it is as uncomfortable as possible. Literature should neither hide the fact nor embellish it.
This applies in peculiar to the media, which have been failing to fulfil their function as 4th power for years. The planet is moving towards a fresh planet war, and most of humanity is incapable to measure threats and opportunities due to the fact that the media, through their propaganda, distorts the facts in specified a way that the fact disappears into always denser fog. Foolishness has reached specified a level that even politicians in the West believe in propaganda of their own media and follow it. The untruths spread by politicians are no longer seen by them as lies – their intellect is mostly not adequate for that. It should be said that politicians have become – and proceed to become – first and foremost “ambassadors” of a constantly decreasing level of education and consequently victims of their own propaganda.
This text tries to show that it is nevertheless possible to separate the grain from the chaff, due to the fact that there is fact among all this garbage, which is media reports.
Let us not forget evil
In the article ‘Will evil prevail?“ I wondered who truly is in charge of geopolitical events in the world. I discussed "City of London" and "Rothschilds" as examples of forces that guide the planet from behind the scenes. They are besides liable for wars, coups and another shocks in our world. Already this tiny part of Epstein's act, which was made public, gave the first thought of the connections between the powerful of this world. See ‘Epstein — “service of evil” — dangerous questions” . Thus, for example, the Rothschild household was one more time brought to light; the same family, who with large effort tried to convince the planet that since planet War II it has no longer exerted any influence and has only been moving respective private banks, museums and vineyards. It should not be amazing that the discussion on the content of Epstein's file or their subsequent publication has completely disappeared from the media; individual malicious would ask who decently controls the media.
The Deep State subject is not a substance distributed by a fistful of lunatics. As early as 2017, president Putin made this point perfectly clear:
‘Presidents change... That's erstwhile elegantly dressed men come in dark suits with briefcases. They start explaining how things truly are... and everything changes overnight.It’s okay. ”
Media
Control is exercised either straight by shareholders, or indirectly by political or economical influences, for example by regulating advertising revenues, placing on a blacklist or manipulating the number of views on YouTube channels. Media control throughout the West is de facto complete – rather an achievement.
It is worth noting the following: politicians and the media praise freedom of speech on all occasion, whether justified or not. Almost at the same time, however, this freedom is restricted by equally loudly condemning the dissemination of "fake news" and "talk of hate" – that is, the exercise of actual freedom of speech – and then, for their political benefit, defining them as a crime and enforcing the applicable legislation.
In the end, the State defines what the terms ‘fake news’ and ‘hate speech’ mean. This leads to the fact that a law which is no longer absolute, but is relativized, is broken under this restriction. In Germany, desirable political case law is safeguarded by political casting of judges in the national Constitutional Court. Procedure for the election of judges to the European Court of Justice it follows a akin pattern.
The consequences of this regulation are deliberate and obvious. Analysts who even express the most legitimate opinion that does not suit the tastes of the rulers are deprived of their rights, expropriated and portrayed as criminals without legal proceedings. The most common measurement is, for example, the EU sanctions which were originally imposed on terrorists, but currently, with the support of a broad public, are imposed on the most nonsubjective experts, specified as Switzerland, and thus non-EU citizens, Jacques Baud; See our accounts on this subject. The consequence of this targeted political influence is relations in conventional media, which no longer have anything to do with the fact and frequently even reverse it.
All geopolitical crises have 1 source
All armed conflicts worldwide must be seen as 1 whole, 1 strategy. The same people who fuel the war against Iran and force make up large Israel besides bear work for the conflict in Ukraine and the war of Europe against Russia, which is likely to happen soon, with many conflicts, for example in Africa, which we do not mention on our blog, besides form part of this strategy. Everything is linked to each other, and the fact that journalists defend war – conducted utilizing methods of genocide – against Iran, Lebanon and Gaza, while supporting Russia's actions in Ukraine, shows a deficiency of knowing of geopolitical issues. The forces that origin and fuel these conflicts are identical. knowing this fact helps to overcome the general geopolitical situation.
The overall image of the situation is not hard to understand: after hundreds of years of colonial regulation over the remainder of the world, the collective West has already lost the economical race with the Global South; more on this subject below. While during the last 500 years of the war it has been about who in the West will exercise hegemony over the colonial empire, the current conflicts concern whether the collective West will be able to keep its colonial empire. The chances are slim, as we have already presented in our series “Two Worlds War OnIt’s okay. ” At the time, we expected many individual conflicts lasting for decades, but without planet war. This comparatively optimistic thesis now seems to wobble, as aggression between planet powers increases overnight, and the collective West does not quit the arrogance of the colonial ruler and completely overestimate its capabilities by utilizing apparent arguments.
Military budget as a measurement of military force is simply a false argument
The Americans have been telling the planet for decades that they have the strongest armed forces in the world. This claim is supported by an astronomical number: a US military budget of up to $1.5 trillion. That's 10 times more than Russian military budget, and even 190 times more than Iran's military budget, which in 2024. was 7.89 billion American dollars. NATO spent $608 million without the United States.
Nevertheless, the United States, along with Israel, failed both in the 12-day war and in the ongoing war that has gotten out of control. NATO and the United States are failing in Ukraine. The vast budgets in the West clearly indicate that Western armed forces are geared not to defend freedom but to rise as much money as possible. This leads to the fact that an arms strategy in the West is considered successful if it can be sold as much as possible to its own armed forces or to the armed forces of 3rd countries. In 2024, we presented a comparison of 2 combat helicopters, which according to experts are equivalent: Russian Kamow KA-52 and American AH-64 Apache. Apache costs US$ 155 million and Kamow costs $16 million. Moreover, the fact that Western arms systems are produced in even homeopathic quantities, and an increase in production that could supply lasting support in the event of a long-term conflict is impossible; it is besides costly, besides complicated, and besides combined with industrial potential, which is simply no longer there.
In the average term, the United States will not be able to produce high-quality military equipment in adequate quantities and at reasonable costs due to the fact that they are presently facing many problems: firstly, there is simply a deficiency of will, due to the fact that the overarching nonsubjective is to profit for the military-industrial complex. Secondly, as a consequence of the deindustrialisation of the United States for the past 30 years, there is no longer an industrial base essential for the production of weapons in the quantities required for war.
Rather, the goal of profit lies in the foreground. nonsubjective observers should see that specified a strategy in a crisis situation must lead to disaster – as the examples of the mediate East and Ukraine have shown. According to various experts, the West lags behind its competitors by at least a decade, both in rocket technology and drones.
For example, Iran, whose arms spending is about 200 times lower than US spending, has hypersonic missiles that are highly hard to intercept. On the another hand, the collective West inactive does not have a hypersonic weapon ready to use. Critics measure this as a consequence of a combination of profit, arrogance and corruption within the military-industrial complex.
If the West wants to act on a military level again in the future, it would gotta thoroughly improvement the military-industrial complex – an undertaking which, in the light of existing economical and political relations, seems almost impossible; this manufacture is controlled by the groups referred to above.
Lack of will to defend in the West
How does the collective West respond to the lost wars? "It increases its military budgets, but does not address the essential structural problems. There is simply a misconception in the West that everything can be solved with money. In Russia, the arms manufacture remains mostly state-owned, and so there is an overriding interest in high-quality but affordable production.
Therefore, in the United States the change will only happen if the American momentum for profit in the production of weapons is seriously questioned – and erstwhile the public manages to gain the best minds to work in the defence manufacture in the interests of the full American society, which is presently not happening. American rocket physicists gain more as analysts in investment banks and have no motivation to service their country due to the fact that in the West, the will to defend practically does not exist. In Germany, for example, 1 number undermines the hope of a greater readiness to defend: out of 300,000 young people The Germans only 530 are ready for military service – that is only 0.17%! (Source: Süddeutsche Zeitung). This figure represents a gross contrast to the statements by Boris Pistorius, the German defence minister, who stated in 2024:
‘We must be ready for war by 2029," said the minister. "We must guarantee deterrence to prevent the escalation of conflict to extremesIt’s okay. ”
So, throughout the West, the possible of preparing the armed forces for war is bleak. Despite this, Europeans and Americans seem to have large assurance towards planet war, having outdated, price-exaggerated weapons systems and without the essential defence will of society. It seems crazy – but it is. The facts talk for themselves. Who does that? It's done by corrupt politicians like the ones we first described.
Economy as a sign of failure
If economical data are taken into account, it is easy to announcement that the Western planet has already lost the economical race. past teaches that in specified a situation war remains the only option.
For years, I have been paying attention to the catastrophic level of public debt and grotesque valuations in financial markets. Moreover, the collective West is besides cheating erstwhile calculating economical power. All this to keep the communicative allowing us to proceed to present the U.S. as number one. If you calculate GDP adjusted for purchasing power, i.e. by taking into account the local purchasing power of individual countries, then the US has already lost.
Source: Visual Capitalist
According to these calculations, China is ahead of the United States and Russia is ahead of Japan and Germany. In addition, the western planet as an aggressor is in a political and economical situation that does not let military confrontation with Russia, Iran and China: The debt of the United States is over 121% of GDP – the last time it happened at the end of planet War II, after a war of industries that secured US dominance in the world. This debt has been reduced to below 40% in 35 years, with inactive favourable economical and political conditions for the US.
Source: Macrotrends
In 1945 the Americans reached the tallness of their power. Together with the russian Union, they dominated the war, held 22,000 tons of gold, and the American manufacture produced 70% of planet production of industrial goods. This is what the actual "full spectrum dominance" looks like: military dominance, industrial dominance, gold – due to the fact that whoever has gold sets the rules. Now the United States is facing the planet war again, and the situation looks the same as the last time after the war, with 1 immense difference: China is at least economically equivalent to the United States, with much better economical conditions.
These are not conducive to a global armed conflict, either financially or economically, and thus besides politically.
Middle East
It is clear from the Memorandum of knowing that Iran defeated both Israel and the United States militarily; otherwise the Americans would never sign specified a document. Israel, under the threat of the collapse of its dreams of greatness, cannot submit to the spirit of this paper and end the wars in Lebanon and the Gaza Strip. So there will be no peace.
Our thoughts on this subject are: "Iran defeats the USA – thoughtsIt’s okay. ” There are increasing voices in Iran claiming that the president and abroad Minister are not negotiating hard adequate – force from Iranian public opinion demands a stronger stance towards the US and Israel. The highest leader of Iran, Mojtaba Chamenei, though approved the MoU letter of intent with the United States on ending the regional war, but under certain conditions. However, in a public statement, he stated that he fundamentally represented a "other position", but agreed to an agreement after president Masoud Pezeshkian had received a warrant that Iran's national rights and the "front of resistance" would be preserved. This is simply a clear indication that the Iranians are yet not ready to compromise at the expense of Lebanon and the Gaza Strip.
It is expected that the conflict in the mediate East will continue: neither the United States nor Israel is prepared to accept the failure of war and its consequences. specified a position shall keep a state of suspension which may at any time tip the balance on 1 side or the other. However, this strategy is countered by the fact that the West is moving out of time due to the situation in the Ormuz Strait. Reduction in oil reserves was the main reason why the United States signed this Memorandum of knowing in general in this content. The Americans are so seeking to keep a state of suspension that will let them to calmly prepare further military steps; however, this condition can only be maintained if the Ormuz Strait remains open in the meantime. While around 130 ships flowed through the Ormuz Strait regular by 28 February 2026, these numbers fell virtually to zero and then stabilised at 5–10% of pre-war traffic to emergence rapidly to 70 vessels on 25 June 2026. These figures should be treated with reserve: It is said that a large part of these 70 ships exported oil from Iran after the United States abolished oil sanctions by signing the applicable document. If the Israelis do not retreat from Lebanon and the Iranians stay relentless – what should be assumed – the Strait of Ormuz will stay clogged with a narrow throat: a clock bomb for supplies of natural materials to the West is inactive ticking.
Iranians can wait – Americans can't. erstwhile assessing the situation, you should simply skip Donald Trump's statements due to the fact that Trump erstwhile talks about peace and erstwhile about war, changing his head sometimes even respective times a day. He seems to believe that this fresh York's "dealmaking" tactics will enable him to accomplish something in relation to the Iranians, which, however, does not happen due to the fact that he achieves only 1 thing: Americans are increasingly confirming that they are incapable to comply with the agreements, thereby threatening planet peace.
War in Europe
The armed conflict in Ukraine, caused by the West, began in 2014. Only those who do not recognise the long-term shelling of Ukrainian artillery in Donbasa as an act of war claim that the Russians started the war in February 2022. It is so apparent that 1 can only be amazed at the arguments of the West that Russia is the aggressor.
Another fact is that this war completely changed the method and tactics of combat – the fighting parties had to adapt to a fresh kind of war, dominated by drones and rocket missiles. Tank columns and army masses are attacked with inexpensive drones immediately after detection – and very quickly. The fighting parties had to adapt and teach this fresh way of fighting. The Russians, in particular, have been successful and now control the battlefield in a fresh way: slow, effective attacks, due to the fact that massive attacks bring only 1 thing: large losses. akin improvement leaps took place many times. The device gun, which was already utilized before planet War I, but whose meaning was underestimated at the time, put an end to the mobile war as early as the first year of the war, erstwhile large columns of people were approaching the enemy and being decimated. At the end of planet War I, tanks restored movement on the front. However, comparing the situation at the front in Ukraine to the situation during planet War I is wrong: slow movement in tiny groups seems to be the only way to last the storm of drones and keep the movement.
The Western media has late reported the Ukrainians' leadership in the war. But this is not actual and has nothing to do with reality. The battles on the front must be distinguished from the attacks of NATO drones in Russia. On the Donbas front, the Russians are inactive dealing with respective fortified cities; after that, Donbas will be liberated. There are no crucial reinforcements beyond them. alternatively of getting into detail, I mention to 1 of the best channels, Military SummaryWho has been reporting the situation on the front twice a day since the beginning of the war.
The West hasn't recognized the signs yet. His experts believe he will win in the war against Russia. However, they have not even defined in any way the objectives of their war. Therefore, they have no strategical plan against Russia but its weakening.
First of all, Germany has designated the beginning of the war with Russia for 2030. But now it's 2026 and Germany seemingly assumes that they can unpunishedly send drones and manoeuvring missiles to Russia by 2030, utilizing Ukraine as their proxy. Europe's actions are clearly coordinated with the US. The usage of these weapons systems is impossible without American participation. president Putin made it clear. A fewer days ago.
Many observers and experts in Russia and abroad presume that president Putin will shortly decide to attack targets in Europe – including those outside Ukraine.
The opinion fan is wide. We have already published respective articles on this subject: in the article “Is 1914 Repeated? Will the war between Europe and Russia yet open?“ We have besides examined Karaganov’s doctrine that advocates the usage of atomic weapons, and we have concluded that an attack is necessary, but not with atomic weapons. Scott Ritter then referred to “Karagan error“ and he besides made a clear message against the usage of atomic weapons.
Conclusion
In the mediate East, I do not see a real chance to end the war, due to the fact that it would mean, on the 1 hand, the withdrawal of American troops and, on the another hand, that Israel would stay alone as a tiny genocidal aggressor. Israelis are under force and proceed the genocide in the Gaza Strip and Lebanon, despite the agreement between the US and Iran, due to the fact that for Netanyahu personally maintaining the war is the only way for political survival.
Russia is under force for president Putin to take a more aggressive stance towards Europe, which no longer tries to hide his direct commitment to the war with Russia. Russia intensifys attacks on Ukraine, including destroying all gas stations in east Ukraine to paralyze its transport infrastructure. Land troops have made clear progress, and after the liberation of the last fortified cities in Donbasa, which is expected in the next fewer weeks, the road to Dnieper will open up.
So president Putin hopes for a military solution in Ukraine and waits for an energy breakdown in Europe, where many flights are already cancelled under trivial pretexts.
Coordinated reports in the West that the situation in Ukraine has changed are not confirmed in the reality there. The fuel shortage in Russia is besides exaggerated. In any regions, fuel is rationed at gas stations. However, this will not change Russia's direction in any way.
I have an opportunity, very irregularly, to talk to individual surviving in Kiev. According to him, the situation is catastrophic, and over 90% of the population opposes Zelensk. To ask why people do not rebel, they replied that the panic of safety and intelligence services intimidated them to specified an degree that communication, essential for the uprising, is impossible. Ukraine, portrayed by the West as a shining example of democracy, seems to be a bomb with delayed ignition, the ticking of which suppresses fear.
I have never feared the outbreak of a war between Europe and Russia, even though Europe has virtually no military potential. president Putin will not take the first step towards the 3rd planet War. Only he knows how long he will tolerate and respond to the systematic provocations of the West.
End of translation
