CONTRIBUTION
This title came to me erstwhile I was reasoning about situations where people choose a different than the dominant option. "Eat crap – 6 billion flies can't be wrong". What if it is?
During planet War II, Poles united in many conspiracy organizations. Since the end of 1941 and the start of airdrops, the AK has been deciding who gets the money and the money. So what made so many unify themselves in organizations without support from London and then Moscow? Where did his sources have this disapproval of the dominant communicative in the underground? Was it truly just about political divisions between sanitization and intent? This second political formation was the basis from which the “Sword and Plow”, “Pomeranian Grift”, NSZ (in the highest period of 70 000 members), the Confederation of the Nation... All this without government support in London. The deficiency of this support caused in any organizations to scope for the rockets to get funds for the activity – just to not be absorbed by the dominant force, the AK – this is where the PLAN went (Polish People's independency Action). The left-wing Polish People's Army was besides someway not ready to give the hand of the People's Army, which was owned by Moscow.
Was it not that besides many saw the tiny and weak in the dominant?
In times of prill, and especially after 1980, 1 could disagree on the existing reality, join “Solidarity”. This one, however, advocated modernization, which was not attractive to everyone – due to the fact that how rebellion is simply a rebellion. "SoWa" and KPN are by far little numerous, but little predictable and more hard to monitor by authorities, and possibly not so willing to compromise. And what's notable is that there were no personnel transfers here, and there was inactive a critical assessment on their part of what 'Solidarity' was doing. distant from this polarised arrangement, the FA looked critically at both sides of the dispute – in Kielce during this period the FA received support from the Confederation of Fighting Solidarity. Exotic alliance? Apparently, due to the fact that both teams were equally disgusted by both power and dominant opposition.
We'll have elections in 2 months. At the end of February, the media reported that 25 electoral committees had been registered. In May, those irrelevant from a media position may get 15 or 20 percent of the vote. Someone's going to say, "stucks!" Atamanish! But I think it's the most conscious part of the electorate. Those who will not vote for those who have a chance to win – as it was during the elections in the top – but on those with the programs they identify themselves with. These divisions are weak? It seems to me that it is alternatively upbuilding – multiplicity of voices, multiplicity of perspectives. It is weak that this is not the basis for discussion, due to the fact that everyone alternatively sends messages without listening to what others gotta say. These 3 jam the voices of the rest, but these 3 are not the voices of all. no of them talk for me and no of them will get my vote. Kurdupelek has his own opinion. due to the fact that 1 dominant voice is easy to drown, all you gotta do is usage a bigger tube, and with polyphony it's harder. Yes, many are easier to manipulate, but many are harder to drown.
