Farmer's OC policy in its legal structure has a very wide application. The scope of this policy extends to the rule of guilt, the rule of hazard and the rule of guilt
in animal supervision. On the another hand, it should be noted that the injured individual who applies for compensation from the Farmer’s OC is entitled to reimbursement of any costs incurred and failure of earnings. Next to the classical compensation
and compensations are crucial elements of the possible of the Farmer's OC policy.
Working on a farm in its nature can origin dangerous situations. Unfortunately, in many farms over the last 3 years,
to an accident in which a individual has suffered individual injury, that is to say, injury on the body in the form of a fracture, intersection, crushing or another condition. In many individually defined cases, you can usage the Farmer's OC policy.
The rule of guilt applies in all situations where the injured individual has suffered injury to the body due to the responsibility of another individual who, while working on an agricultural holding, has blamed and harmed another person. To illustrate this properly, the following example can be presented: the farmer went to the pigsty to execute the rite of pigs. He went in to feed the feed trough. Unfortunately, he did not close the door behind him, so the pig ran out of the stick, ran from the pigsty into the yard, and there collided with the farmer's passing mother. In specified a situation, the farmer’s OC policy will apply, as the farmer did not safe the gate, resulting in a pig escape and an accident.
Another legal basis that can be utilized to get compensation from the Farmer’s OC is the rule of risk. This is simply a legal standard that protects victims of accidents on an agricultural holding working with machinery and equipment. hazard principle
is applicable in situations where the injured individual was working with a device or device, there was a failure during the operation, resulting in injury to the body while doing the work. It is worth noting that this rule does not give the owner of the holding an chance to pay compensation. It only works for the benefit of household members
and workers who worked on the farm. Consider, for example, a situation where the boy of a farm owner receives instructions from his father to cut a tree utilizing a table saw. This saw is powered by an electrical motor, and the power from the engine is passed to the cutting unit utilizing the belt. erstwhile a man cuts a tree, at any point the belt breaks, hitting the working individual in the face, causing facial injury. Although there was no owner of the OC Farmer's policy at the scene.
Last legal basis to be applied after an accident
on the farm, there is wine in animal control. According to this principle, any individual who has been in contact with animals on a holding may apply
For compensation. The only subject exception is that the owner of the animal or the individual who exercised care over the animal cannot claim compensation.
To the will of accuracy it is worth explaining the application of this rule as an example. On 1 farm, a farmer carried a bull through the backyard he had led
for the chain attached. At 1 point, as he passed by his standing father, the bull, by his own impulse, began kicking, and his hind leg kicked the father of the farmer, causing a broken leg in the victim. Even though the imprisoned farmer had no influence
for the behaviour of the animal, this situation gives the anticipation to apply an OC Farmer policy
and applying for monetary compensation.
Using the above legal bases, the injured individual may apply for a number of OC policy cash benefits: compensation, compensation, reimbursement of treatment costs, commutes, reimbursement of lost income, pension, adaptation of the flat to the needs of the disabled individual after the accident and any another reimbursement of the costs resulting from the resulting injury after the accident.
Written by Sławomir Szymanski
Contact the author of the article: +48 662 071 269
