Today, I found a illustration on the net according to which BRICS' GDP exceeded G7 GDP. Of course, individual can say that something is incorrect there and biasedly calculated that the GDP per head income in the West is much higher than in BRICS, which inhabits much more people, etc. However, the fact is that – regardless of whether BRICS' GDP has already exceeded G7 GDP, or only catching up with it – this is the Western predominate over the world, its supremacy, shrinks, and this virtually all day, and the tables showing long-term trends are simply crushing for him. It's the end of an eon.
Let us callback that eon (Gr. aion) is simply a alternatively ambiguous concept from the ancient doctrine and religion of the Hellenistic era, meaning a spiritual being surviving in a long period – a kind of an angel that has its beginning and will have its end – or a historical era that lasts, for example, respective 100 years, or no doubt, beyond the dimension of human life. In writing about the "end of the eon," I am referring to the era, the era that began between 1517 and 1534. Years are not random: in 1517 the spiritual revolt of Martin Luther began, meaning Protestantism began to develop, while 1534 was the announcement in England of the alleged Act of Supremacy, meaning the separation of England from Rome. The 1517 rebellion marks the beginning of the Protestant world, and the 1534 rebellion marks the beginning of the Anglo-Saxon world. Our eon started these 2 events, and as a result, the Protestant-English planet was created. The same planet broke the domination of the Latin South, the Mediterranean world, symbolized by the order of Rome, then the Catholic Church and the Roman peoples, utilizing Latin-based languages. Eon Protestant-Anglossian has never enjoyed my large sympathy due to the fact that he is anti-Catholic and highly hostile to the Roman tradition. In addition, in the eyes of his representatives and associated politicians, we, Poles – as Slavs and Catholics – were, are and will be at the bottom of the hierarchy of nations. We are neither Anglo-Saxons nor even a Romanic nation, but barbarians from the East, who in addition are “paps.”
It is estimated that around 1700 Europe was an economical dwarf in Asia. Asia most likely produced 2/3 more planet GDP in 1700, especially China and India. And here was the success of the Protestant-Anglossian eon, who abandoned the conventional land-based economy. Not only did it start to produce but mainly to process and to trade processed products. To a large extent, agricultural products were supplied by the Republic of Szlachecka as a “spichler of Europe” which allowed people to be thrown into the work of superintendent and craftsman, i.e. to the capitalism that was now in decline. Capital was created, entrepreneurship was developed, banks were created, machines were invented, moving bays, steam device was utilized Chinese powder invention to produce weapons. Meanwhile, Asia stood inactive and in the 19th century it was behind Europe, despite its tremendous demographic advantage and the number of hands to work. In the 19th century the West divided the world, divided the land among itself into colonies and spheres of influence. India has been colonized and China has become a subsidiary region where the "canoniere policy" is conducted.
Many people in Poland and in the West seem to think that the Protestant-Anglossian eon is inactive going on, and Asia is – as Immanuel Wallerstein calls it – “peripheries”, and at most “half-peripheries” of the western center. It's an illusion! This Wallerstein, although a staunch Marxist, had already made an highly accurate reflection 20 years ago: The West ceases to work and produce by turning to alleged financial capitalism, where GDP becomes little and little derivative of labour, and more and more speculation, interest on credit, extra money (dollar position in the world), etc. Production is transferred to ‘semi-peripheral’ countries where inexpensive labour is. So it moves to Asia erstwhile Africa is left at the bottom as a "periphery" from which only natural materials are transported.
The reality exceeded Wallerstein's expectations. He was talking about a revolution in the West with hippies or alter globalists. In fact, the real opponent of Western supremacy was born in Asia. They were China and another countries of this continent, which now, as a consequence of sanctions imposed on Russia, received inexpensive Siberian natural materials. Hence, the economical outburst of BRICS countries, which have ceased to be “semi-periphery” by constituting a fresh centre, opposing the Western centre. The globalised planet in front of us is divided into 2 “sub-globalizations” – Western and Asian.
Worse for the Protestant-Anglossian world, the main states of this eon not only produce little and little real, switching to financial capitalism. They are additionally in a terrible worldview and moral crisis. I will not describe and limit this crisis by listing the alleged LGBT agenda, a warring feminism. The West doesn't want to work, doesn't want to have children and rise liable people. It does not reproduce in numbers, wants to work little and little (four days a week), download “plus” programs, have “guaranteed income” and believes that the social state will solve all problems. During this time, the carnival will proceed in gay colors, ostentatious consumption and eternal fun. But it's super fun on Titanic! Asia, BRICS, “global south” – names for choice and colour – eats us in front of our eyes!
Actually, I don't feel bad about the dusky West. The present generation has what it wants, and future generations will either not be born, either run for equality parades, or sit in front of Tik-Tok, and during this time the Protestant-Anglossian eon will be extinguished and the Chinese or Chinese-Asian eon will be born. Paradoxically, he understands Russia's problem, which shifts to Asia to catch a fresh eon. What about us? Are we truly the last generations of Poles?
Adam Wielomski
