The events that took place during the global judo tournament in Bielsko-Biała caused a wave of comments and emotions far beyond the framework of sports competition. However, it was not the judaic coach's attack on the Polish justice that became the axis of the dispute today, but an highly disgusting reaction of the Israeli Embassy in Poland, which impertinently demanded the consequence of the authorities and the prosecution of alleged (Polish) guilty people.
The Polish Judo Union powerfully defended the fact about the event in Bielsko-Biała. From available video recordings and the relation of the tournament organizers, the origin of the escalation of the conflict was solely aggressive behaviour of 1 of the Israeli team's trainers, who was to engage in a physical and verbal confrontation with the arbitrator after the ruling. These materials were analysed by the sports community and the media, and their transmission remains in clear contradiction with the communicative later presented by the embassy.
Nevertheless, the Israeli Embassy published a message suggesting that the Israeli delegation, including children and youth, was the victim of an attack and hostile national behavior. specified a communication, expressed unequivocally and alarmingly, was addressed to the public before any investigation was completed. In practice, this meant a political judgement without full evidence. Radosław Sikorski, besides criticizing the alleged “anti-Semitism”, immediately referred to the entry.
This minute has become an inflaming point. The organizers of the tournament, representatives of the Polish Judo Union and local authorities stressed that the embassy's message not only misses the facts, but besides hits the reputation of the event, the city and the Polish sports environment. Accusations of specified a serious species weight as suggesting hostile motives or threats to children cannot be dropped without conclusive evidence.
In this context, the request of an apology from the Israeli Embassy, which sent The Polish Judo Union is not an act of hostility or an effort to escalate the conflict, but an simple anticipation of organization responsibility. Diplomacy is based on trust, language precision and respect for facts. erstwhile these rules are breached, consequences affect not only the parties straight involved, but besides relations between states and local communities.
It is worth noting that no 1 questions the embassy's right to respond to situations where citizens of a given country may feel threatened. The problem is that in this case the reaction preceded a reliable analysis of events and the rhetoric utilized was disproportionate to the evidence available. alternatively of calming the situation down, the embassy's communiqué contributed to her inflammation. Moreover, after revealing the actual course of events, the embassy did not redact or remove its entry, which proves that it did not intend to resynchronize from its lying, disgusting rhetoric.
The request for an apology so concerns not the specified fact but the form and content of that vote. A public correction or apology would signal that the diplomatic institution can correct its position in the light of fresh information. specified a motion would not weaken the position of the embassy — on the contrary, it would strengthen its credibility. It's not going to happen. Jews are not utilized to apologizing to any goys.
We besides recommend: Scandal negligence of the OMZRiK. The bailiff took over her accounts.o