THE POLISH-POLISH WAR?

For any time, bloggers and publicists have spread the word “Polish-Polish War” , calling for consent and highlighting the nonsense of specified a conflict. The absurdity of this appeal – after closer examination of the case – is evident. The conflict is not between Poles, but between Poles and peers. Prof. Ryszard Legutko in “Essay on the Polish soul” (Krakow, OMP, 2008) showed clearly that the territory of Poland was inhabited by 2 nations: Poles – a persecuted and marginalized part of the nation – and the dominant political faction of Peerelczyks, a “nation” conceived during the communist period and upgraded in mature form already in the 3rd Polish Republic. This seemingly unusual verdict is explained by the fact that prof. Legutko issued his deliberations in 2008, erstwhile indeed the Peerelians – apart from the period 2005-2007 – held all the power and in their arrogance and corruption allowed themselves to proceed to corrupt an illegitimate state, which, unfortunately, after 1989 was in many respects the continuation of the PRL. In fact, the 3rd Republic of Poland has not yet been established, although we usage this concept in a contractual sense, as the country "Polish" after 1989 inactive had many Peerelistic features and even in 2017 there were relics from that era, so it is hard to recognise the 3rd Republic of Poland. This would be an insult to the Second Polish Republic, as the level of "lawfulness" rose only somewhat in relation to the lawlessness of the Polish People's Republic, so it floats just over this lawlessness. Of course, the alleged thick line (a blurring of guilt and judging of crime) contributed to the further fall of Themida. At that time the social base of Peeerelians was saved, and their endurance was supported by the provisions of the circular table and fanatical opposition to mirroring and decommunisation. Here we should mention the 5th chapter of the book by Prof. Legutki, in which he lectures the genesis of the Peerelian "elite": "...I have and thugs who before the war constituted a social margin, in the era of the Polish People's Republic created government, state institutions and force apparatus". From specified substance came this alternate "nation" of Peerelians, and after 1989 even multiplied its ranks by household circles, succession of children, then grandchildren, and besides by mafia clientele. Thus, 1989 did not turn out to be the end of the regulation of “the thug and the bully”, people investigating the scandals continued to die, from FOZZ beginning, and the impunity of the embezzlers deepened corruption and further degraded ex-peerel iniquities. It did not number as a code or a pattern of the past, as Magdalena blocked the return to solid regulation of law from the period II of the Polish Republic. shortly the KRS (1990) was formed, where nearly 80 judges were presented by Gen. Jaruzelski! In 1992 the government of Prime Minister Olszewski was overthrown, it was a tragedy to measurement the abortion of the Polish state's embryo. And if we can't improvement the KRS today, that means the round-table strategy is holding tight.

And as Joseph Darski pointed out aptly (following the lead of Prof. Leguta): ‘ After the 1945 cataclysm and the liquidation of the erstwhile elitesa fresh nation began to be created without roots and historical identity. The Polish People's Republic kept Poles from their history, and the 3rd Republic, to the times of the PiS government, inactive freed Polish residents from the balance of national memory. (...) Both after 1945 and after 1989, the elite was authoritarian due to the fact that it was created by a political decision of a fresh power that gave it indivisible rule.” (Gazeta Polska, 26. XI. 2008, p.7). Indeed, the transition to this III of the Polish Republic took place without free elections (partial elections on June 4, 1989 were a farce), and the second act of comedy was practically the nomination of Gen. Jaruzelski as president, as he did not have a countercandidate in the vote. The past of the alleged III of the Polish Republic began in the Peerel style, and who challenged the circular table was called a "fool". From the very beginning, the PZPR nomenclature has torpedoed all thought of the Polish state, which was drowned in Magdalena. Therefore, the diagnosis of any "Polish-Polish" war is fundamentally unfounded, without meaning, due to the fact that it is the "Peerelians" of the Polish PZPR (and their services, "internal Moscow") that blocked us in 1989 the creation of the 3rd Republic of Poland, only agreeing to its empty name without a real national entity.

Let us look at the example taken from the no.133/134 “Arcans (January – April 2017) where Kazimierz Dadak writes in the conclusion of the “Copernician Revolution in American politics?” : "At the minute we are almost completely absorbed in the Polish-Polish war. This is simply a occupation that only benefits our enemies. The challenges Poland can face shortly require alternatively a “great coalition” It's beautiful, but it's not actual at all. First – how can 1 make specified a diagnosis erstwhile 1 of the parties to Poland has small in common outside the language, due to the fact that mentally and culturally it belonged to the large Brother. So the Peerelians themselves excluded themselves from the Polish region and they are reportedly well off, as illustrated by the Bunchu entries of the innernauts, for example, "The very name of me is an insult to me." Or, “I would like to be a Russian citizen...”. Is it: “We puppies want to Germany, Poland is simply a sick country!” ( quotes from the same issue of GP, p.7). deficiency of respect for independency is simply a common symptom in Peerelczyks, who voted for the PO collectively due to the fact that the word “Poland” disgusts them, concludes Darski. Let us add, however, that it is not Poland that is this "sick country", but it is the creation of the Polish People's Republic and it is the Peerelians who do not agree to the healing of the country. The imagination is gloomy, and the 2015 elections proved that the renegades were much little due to the fact that the election was won by the PiS, a patriot party. Thus, the Peerelians are a "minor", and Poles yet undertook to heal the state in which they were immediately disturbed, even vetoed the reform. Secondly, Dadak emphasizes that our enemies benefit from national disagreement. Of course, this is the case already, but it is not the Poles who are liable for this disagreement, but the elements that do not identify with the nation and support abroad interests, not Polish interests. And these are Peerelians and their fresh allies, from an environment that expresses anti-Polish trends that are based in the EU, which is officially fighting national states. There are besides supporters of super-liberal views, feminists, or connoisseurs of another dimensions of “the rainbows”. All these malcontents of sovereignty can be seen as rejects and even as traitors to the national community, formed during the Millennium of the Polish state.

Thirdly, in this context, it is not possible to talk of a "brotherly" fight, due to the fact that the clash is between the post-PRL tombs and Poles defending their eternal rights to self-existence and to build the 3rd Republic, alternatively than any hybrid about peerless relics and devoid of independence, which was implemented by the PO-PSL government. Finally, the promotion of a "great coalition" as a remedy is completely unrealistic, due to the fact that it is hard to imagine an agreement between the patriot organization (PiS) and groups of renegades calling on Brussels to intervene and constantly blocking the improvement of the state, erstwhile called hastily the 3rd Republic. It's worth a laugh, due to the fact that in 1989 the reformed version of PRL was handed to Poles! Mr Kazimierz Dadak so omitted crucial details and blurred the real image of our political mosaic. By the way, let us remind that the communists besides called us to unity and cheated Poles with the mirage of any Front of Unity of Nation. They then raised the argument of an "imperialist threat" despite item as spicy as the fact that we were in the hands of the russian empire. The word "Polish-Polish War" has no justification and is misleading from the ground, and is due to political courtesy. utilized frequently, even by the president of PiS, and late in the first speech by Dr. Karol Nawrocki, a candidate for the office of President, omits the fact that supporters of full power are thrown into 1 bag without shadow of the regulation of law (so-called peers) and Poles aspiring to the regulation of law of the 3rd Republic of Poland. Last year has shown a profound difference between these 2 divisions of citizens! possibly the peers would like to authenticate as partners in dialogue? Nothing like that, they don't care about it, they break their masks and put on violence, after all Trzaskowski says that “today they must be like 1 clenched fist”! They forced the dialog in 1989, and present they no longer request it, due to the fact that they have power and they do not intend to give it back. And for 30 years they have proved that the destiny of Poland and Poles is completely indifferent to them and do not have a good will to participate in the improvement of the unfinished III of Poland. Peerelians want to live from Poland, not for Poland! They want to parasitise on the body of the Homeland, not work for its future, so the coalition with the rejects is unacceptable for the sake of Poland. And the coalition on 13 December 2023 proved in black and white that its renegades show anti-Polish trends, deepen the collapse of democracy and the regulation of law, or ignore Polishness and teaching national history. Ergo, Poles and Peerelians are like citizens of 2 separate states, not yet completed the 3rd Republic and this hybrid PRL-bis, or even worse. Old staff from the years of the Polish People's Republic with the aid of abroad agents are trying to break up the framework of the 3rd Republic of Poland, they do not substance entirely to the interests of Poland, nor to the principles of democracy. And not even president Andrzej Duda will reconcile both sides, due to the fact that the Peerels want it to be as it was, and they will not step down. They replaced the erstwhile dictatorship of the pro-Soviet organization after 1989 with the dictatorship of the Peerelian system, present implemented in the coalition on 13 December! In turn Poles must not let Homeland to stay the fossil of the Polish People's Republic for always –bis. The 3rd Republic will only be created if we shake from the institutions of the state poisonous waste from the past era. The removal of the post-peerel nomenclature and the thorough improvement of Themida are a essential key to the future and democracy, without it Poland will never become a usually functioning country, nor the 3rd Republic.

Marek Baterovich