Poles cannot cut off from demanding the condemnation of Ukrainian genocide

Perhaps Dr. Grzegorz Motyka is following the guidelines of the Resolution of the National Council of the CNS of 22 VI. 1990 : To strive for the Vistula action to stand in the Polish parliament and to be condemned by Poles themselves as genocide. The initiator cannot be Wet but 1 of the Poles (Viktor Poliszczuk, Toronto 1999)

Dr. Grzegorz Motyka, presently manager of the Military Historical Bureau, associate of the IPN College (established on 22 June 2023 by the legislature to the Commission for the Pursuit of Crimes against the Polish Nation (sic!) during a conversation with Rafał Dutkiewicz in 2022 said: "I hope the war in Ukraine made it clear in Poland that colleagues in Ukraine cannot cut off from the UPA tradition".

Did he tell his Ukrainian colleagues to realize that Poles cannot cut off from demanding the condemnation of Ukrainian genocide, the Nuremberg criminal trial and burial of the remains of victims of crimes found in thousands of death pits?

Dr. Grzegorz Motyka besides wrote educational papers, which were first publically assessed in the Sejm in December 2007. In point 6 of the Resolution adopted at this meeting, it was requested to retreat from the schools "IPN educational subject "Polish-Ukrainian relations between 1939 and 1947".

Fragments from 16th page analysis of educational tissues of IPN issued in 2011 – Polish-Ukrainian relations 1939-1947n Prof. Józef Wysocki:

II. survey MATERIALS

Appearances of objectivity. The materials for the student show that they are made up of quotes from various studies and relationships. This is intended to make appearances of objectivity, as the sources quoted come from Ukrainian and Polish authors and from archives. Only that 3 authentically Polish authors were awarded 3 pages and 1 page as a study of the Home Army. Ukrainian authors in number 13 and 2 supposedly besides Poles, but banderophiles, were awarded 37 pages. The chief editor of the survey Dr Grzegorz Motyka - I do not know on what rule - counted himself among Polish authors and reserved 25 pages of the text. In this statistic - for apparent reasons - I took the liberty of including the texts of Dr. Grzegorz Motyka, as well as His individual himself in "his own" - or banderophile.

Name and euphemisms. The text uses the geographical naming of Ukrainian alternatively than Polish. For example, “Galicja” alternatively of Małopolska, “Eastern Galicia” alternatively of the South-East Kresy, or briefly: “Eastern Malopolska”. alternatively of banders - “Ukrainian guerrilla” or “UPA soldiers” (they never called themselves that). alternatively of the OUN-UPA genocide, “the attacks on Polish towns”, “the removal of Poles from our lands”, “actions against Poles”, “volyn events”, “events in east Galicia”, “expulsion of the Polish population”, “war”, “bloody conflict that has warmed up” (impersonally, like a weather phenomenon!), “the detonation of the uprising” (it is an armed action against the current power, that is, it should be directed against Germans, alternatively than the defenseless population), “get a clean cultural area”, “bander action”, no, and “anti-Polish action”, utilized 35 times...argument is, of course, an indication for dr Grzegorz Motyka, that this banderian euphemism should be implanted in Polish historical and textbook literature.

(...) OUN-UPA genocide, with features of the world's unparalleled deviant cruelty, carried out on the defenceless Polish, Jewish, Czech, Gypsy, Russian and Ukrainian populations, cannot be presented in light another than that resulting from the tactics and numbers. Genocide cannot be called, for example, a "partisan struggle". The full set of Tek aims to relativise CNS-UPA crimes through naming, comparing the National Army with UPA, suppressing facts, understatements, or even fraud.

The authors of “Tek” were aware that the student preparing to make Polish-Ukrainian issues was completely unread in the subject, hence the ease of imposing a view on him, which can be deformed according to the authors' wishes.

It is easy to imagine the consternation of teachers, especially those on the Recovered Lands, coming straight from settlers who miraculously avoided death from the Upów axe, or fought with UPA after the war, who, as descendants of these undefeated Poles, are to teach their children that their grandparents were murderers of the defenceless Ukrainian population.

In particular, the name of Polish soldiers who, after the end of the war, alternatively of returning to their homes, had to fight UPA and who were taken prisoner died in cruel torture. Therefore, the conscience of teachers on the Recovered Lands completely rejects the past lessons based on “Tekki”...In this sense, the authors' intention to impose an ounist view on the past of both nations from the years of planet War II through the Polish school did not scope the goal.

On the another hand, political literature in the planet may mention to “Teki”, quoting lies contained in them as facts, as described in the Polish source, published by the state institute in free, independent and democratic Poland - here the authors achieved the goal. (prof. dr hab. Józef Wysocki, Na Rąbieży nr 14/2011).

Similarly, Dr Przemysław Żurawski (now a associate of the Council of the president for abroad Policy) commented in 2013 on Polish-Ukrainian relations, as reported by Gazeta Polska in an article entitled "The Volynsko-Galicska Rabacja" : The interests of the Republic require the marginalisation of issues of historical conflicts. This message besides appears to coincide with the Ukrainian guidelines of the Resolution of the National OUN Provod of 22 VI. 1990

When assessing the “Wisła” operation, it should be stated that it was taken under the applicable government of an global law entity not only having the right but besides the work to destruct terrorist structures operating in its territory with the intention of depriving part of its territory. The actions of the authorities of the then Republic of Poland did not disagree in their nature from the methods of akin actions undertaken in democratic countries. (Viktor Poliszczuk Ukrainian historian).

Oh, my God.